as,indeed,wehaveaccepteditwithregardtoallthedeeperflowandfinerexpressionoffeelingeveninthedomesticrelations:foritseemedpedanticandfutiletoprescriberulesforthis,oreventhoughwenaturallyadmireandpraiseanynotungracefulexhibitionofintenseandgenuineaffectiontodelineateanidealofexcellenceforalltoaimat。Still,thereseemedtobeanimportantsphereofstrictduty——howeverhardtodefine——intherelationsofchildrentoparents,etc。,andeveninthecaseoffriendshipitseemscontrarytocommonsensetorecognisenosuchsphere;asitnotunfrequentlyoccurstoustojudgethatonefriendhasbehavedwronglytoanother,andtospeakasiftherewereaclearlycognisablecodeofbehaviourinsuchrelations。
Perhaps,however,wemaysaythatallclearcasesofwrongconducttowardsfriendscomeunderthegeneralformulaofbreachofunderstanding。Friendsnotunfrequentlymakedefinitepromisesofservice,butweneednotconsiderthese,astheirviolationisprohibitedbyadifferentandclearermoralrule。Butfurther,asallloveisunderstoodtoincludeadesireforthehappinessofitsobject,theprofessionoffriendshipseemstobindonetoseekthishappinesstoanextentproportionatetosuchprofession。Nowcommonbenevolencecf。ante,§;5prescribesatleastthatweshouldrendertoothermensuchservicesaswecanrenderwithoutanysacrifice,orwithasacrificesotriflingastobequiteoutofproportiontotheservicerendered。Andsincetheprofessionoffriendshipthoughthetermisusedtoincludeaffectionsofvariousdegreemustimplyagreaterinterestinone’sfriend’shappinessthaninthatofmeningeneral,itmustannounceawillingnesstomakemoreorlessconsiderablesacrificesforhim,ifoccasionoffers。Ifthenwedeclinetomakesuchsacrifices,wedowrongbyfailingtofulfilnaturalandlegitimateexpectations。SofarthereseemsnosourceofdifficultyexcepttheindefinitenessinevitablyarisingfromthewiderangeofmeaningscoveredbythetermFriendship。Butfurtherquestionsariseinconsequenceofthechangesoffeelingtowhichhumannatureisliable:first,whetheritisourdutytoresistsuchchangesasmuchaswecan;andsecondly,whetherifthiseffortfails,andlovediminishesordeparts,weoughtstilltomaintainadispositiontorenderservicescorrespondingtoourpastaffection。Andonthesepointstheredoesnotseemtobeagreementamongmoralandrefinedpersons。For,ontheonehand,itisnaturaltoustoadmirefidelityinfriendshipandstabilityofaffections,andwecommonlyregardtheseasmostimportantexcellencesofcharacter:andsoitseemsstrangeifwearenottoaimattheseasatallotherexcellences,asnonemorenaturallystirustoimitation。Andhencemanywouldbepreparedtolaydownthatweoughtnottowithdrawaffectiononcegiven,unlessthefriendbehavesill:whilesomewouldsaythateveninthiscaseweoughtnottobreakthefriendshipunlessthecrimeisverygreat。Yet,ontheotherhand,wefeelthatsuchaffectionasisproducedbydeliberateeffortofwillisbutapoorsubstituteforthatwhichspringsspontaneously,andmostrefinedpersonswouldrejectsuchaboon:while,again,toconcealthechangeoffeelingseemsinsincereandhypocritical。
Butasforservices,arefinedpersonwouldnotacceptsuchfromaformerfriendwhonolongerloveshim:unlessinextremeneed,whenanykindoftieis,asitwere,invigoratedbythealreadystrongclaimwhichcommonhumanitygiveseachmanuponallothers。Perhaps,therefore,therecannotbeadutytooffersuchservicesinanycase,whentheneedisnotextreme。Thoughthisinferenceisnotquiteclear:forinrelationsofaffectionweoftenpraiseonepartyforofferingwhatweratherblametheotherforaccepting。Butitseemsthatdelicatequestionsofthiskindaremorenaturallyreferredtocanonsofgoodtasteandrefinedfeelingthanofmoralityproper:oratleastonlyincludedinthescopeofmoralityinsofaraswehaveageneraldutytocultivategoodtasteandrefinementoffeeling,likeotherexcellences。
Onthewhole,then,wemaysaythatthechiefdifficultiesindeterminingthemoralobligationsoffriendshiparise1fromtheindefinitenessofthetacitunderstandingimpliedintherelation,and2fromthedisagreementwhichwefindastotheextenttowhichFidelityisapositiveduty。Itmaybeobservedthatthelatterdifficultyisespeciallyprominentinrespectofthoseintimaciesbetweenpersonsofdifferentsexwhichprecedeandpreparethewayformarriage。
1passnowtothethirdhead,Gratitude。