Mydifficultywas，asIhavesaid，thatthisclaimofconscience，whetherutilitarianornot，hadtobeharmonisedwiththeclaimofRationalSelf-love；
andthatIvaguelysupposedButlertoavoidoroverride[thelatterclaim]。
Butreadinghimatthisstagewithmorecare，I
foundinhim，withpleasureandsurprise，aviewverysimilartothatwhichhaddevelopeditselfinmyownmindinstrugglingtoassimilateMillandKant。Ifoundheexpresslyadmittedthat``interest，myownhappiness，isamanifestobligation’’，andthat``ReasonableSelf-love’’[is``oneofthetwochieforsuperiorprinciplesinthenatureofman’’]。Thatis，herecogniseda``DualismoftheGoverningFaculty’’——orasIprefertosay``DualismofthePracticalReason’’，sincethe`authority’onwhichButlerlaidstressmustpresentitselftomymindastheauthorityofreason，beforeIcanadmitit。
Ofthismorepresently:whatInowwishtomakeclearisthatitwasonthisside——ifImaysosay——thatIenteredintoButler’ssystemandcameundertheinfluenceofhispowerfulandcautiousintellect。ButtheeffectofhisinfluencecarriedmeafurtherstepawayfromMill:forIwasledbyittoabandonthedoctrineofPsychologicalHedonism，andtorecognisetheexistenceof`disinterested’or`extra-regarding’