Prof。H。Lecoq,whohasmadeagreatnumberofcrossingsbetweenthedifferentlycolouredvarietiesofMirabilisjalapa(11/122。’Geograph。Bot。
del’Europe’tome31854page405;and’DelaFecondation’1862page302。)
findsthatintheseedlingsthecoloursrarelycombine,butformdistinctstripes;orhalftheflowerisofonecolourandhalfofadifferentcolour。Somevarietiesregularlybearflowersstripedwithyellow,white,andred;butplantsofsuchvarietiesoccasionallyproduceonthesamerootbrancheswithuniformlycolouredflowersofallthreetints,andotherbrancheswithhalf—and—halfcolouredflowers,andotherswithmarbledflowers。Gallesio(11/123。’TraiteduCitrus’1811page45。)crossedreciprocallywhiteandredcarnations,andtheseedlingswerestriped;butsomeofthestripedplantsalsoboreentirelywhiteandentirelyredflowers。Someoftheseplantsproducedoneyearredflowersalone,andinthefollowingyearstripedflowers;orconversely,someplants,afterhavingbornefortwoorthreeyearsstripedflowers,wouldrevertandbearexclusivelyredflowers。ItmaybeworthmentioningthatIfertilisedthePURPLESWEET—PEA(Lathyrusodoratus)withpollenfromthelight—colouredPAINTEDLADY:seedlingsraisedfromthesamepodwerenotintermediateincharacter,butperfectlyresembledeitherparent。Laterinthesummer,theplantswhichhadatfirstborneflowersidenticalwiththoseofthePAINTED
LADY,producedflowersstreakedandblotchedwithpurple;showinginthesedarkermarksatendencytoreversiontothemother—variety。AndrewKnight(11/124。’Transact。Linn。Soc。’volume9page268。)fertilisedtwowhitegrapeswithpollenoftheAleppogrape,whichisdarklyvariegatedbothinitsleavesandfruit。Theresultwasthattheyoungseedlingswerenotatfirstvariegated,butallbecamevariegatedduringthesucceedingsummer;
besidesthis,manyproducedonthesameplantbunchesofgrapeswhichwereallblack,orallwhite,orlead—colouredstripedwithwhite,orwhitedottedwithminuteblackstripes;andgrapesofalltheseshadescouldfrequentlybefoundonthesamefoot—stalk。
Iwillappendaverycuriouscase,notofbud—variation,butoftwocoheringembryos,differentincharacterandcontainedwithinthesameseed。Adistinguishedbotanist,Mr。G。H。Thwaites(11/125。’AnnalsandMag。
ofNat。Hist。’March1848。)statesthataseedfromFuchsiacoccineafertilisedbyF。fulgens,containedtwoembryos,andwas\"atruevegetabletwin。\"Thetwoplantsproducedfromthetwoembryoswere\"extremelydifferentinappearanceandcharacter,\"thoughbothresembledotherhybridsofthesameparentageproducedatthesametime。Thesetwinplants\"werecloselycoherent,belowthetwopairsofcotyledon—leaves,intoasinglecylindricalstem,sothattheyhadsubsequentlytheappearanceofbeingbranchesononetrunk。\"Hadthetwounitedstemsgrownuptotheirfullheight,insteadofdying,acuriouslymixedhybridwouldhavebeenproduced。AmongrelmelondescribedbySageret(11/126。’PomologiePhysiolog。’1830page126。)mayperhapshavethusoriginated;forthetwomainbranches,whicharosefromtwocotyledon—buds,producedverydifferentfruit,——ontheonebranchlikethatofthepaternalvariety,andontheotherbranchliketoacertainextentthatofthematernalvariety,themelonofChina。]
Inmostofthesecasesofcrossedvarieties,andinsomeofthecasesofcrossedspecies,thecolourspropertobothparentsappearedintheseedlings,assoonastheyfirstflowered,intheformofstripesorlargersegments,oraswholeflowersorfruitofdifferentkindsborneonthesameplant;andinthiscasetheappearanceofthetwocolourscannotstrictlybesaidtobeduetoreversion,buttosomeincapacityoffusion。When,however,thelaterflowersorfruitproducedduringthesameseason,orduringasucceedingyearorgeneration,becomestripedorhalf—and—half,etc。,thesegregationofthetwocoloursisstrictlyacaseofreversionbybud—variation。Whetherallthemanyrecordedcasesofstripedflowersandfruitareduetoprevioushybridisationandreversionisbynomeansclear,forinstancewithpeachesandnectarines,moss—roses,etc。InafuturechapterIshallshowthat,withanimalsofcrossedparentage,thesameindividualhasbeenknowntochangeitscharacterduringgrowth,andtoreverttooneofitsparentswhichitdidnotatfirstresemble。Finally,fromthevariousfactsnowgiven,therecanbenodoubtthatthesameindividualplant,whetherahybridoramongrel,sometimesreturnsinitsleaves,flowers,andfruit,eitherwhollyorbysegments,tobothparent—
forms。
ONTHEDIRECTORIMMEDIATEACTIONOFTHEMALEELEMENTONTHEMOTHERFORM。
Anotherremarkableclassoffactsmustbehereconsidered,firstly,becausetheyhaveahighphysiologicalimportance,andsecondly,becausetheyhavebeensupposedtoaccountforsomecasesofbud—variation。Irefertothedirectactionofthemaleelement,notintheordinarywayontheovules,butoncertainpartsofthefemaleplant,orincaseofanimalsonthesubsequentprogenyofthefemalebyasecondmale。Imaypremisethatwithplantstheovariumandthecoatsoftheovulesareobviouslypartsofthefemale,anditcouldnothavebeenanticipatedthattheywouldhavebeenaffectedbythepollenofaforeignvarietyorspecies,althoughthedevelopmentoftheembryo,insidetheembryonicsack,insidetheovuleandovarium,ofcourse,dependsonthemaleelement。
[Evenaslongagoas1729itwasobserved(11/127。’PhilosophicalTransact。’volume431744—45page525。)thatwhiteandbluevarietiesofthePea,whenplantedneareachother,mutuallycrossed,nodoubtthroughtheagencyofbees,andintheautumnblueandwhitepeaswerefoundwithinthesamepods。Wiegmannmadeanexactlysimilarobservationinthepresentcentury。Thesameresulthasfollowedseveraltimeswhenavarietywithpeasofonecolourhasbeenartificiallycrossedbyadifferently—colouredvariety。(11/128。Mr。Goss’Transact。Hort。Soc。’volume5page234:andGartner’Bastarderzeugung’1849ss。81and499。)ThesestatementsledGartner,whowashighlyscepticalonthesubject,carefullytotryalongseriesofexperiments:heselectedthemostconstantvarieties,andtheresultconclusivelyshowedthatthecolouroftheskinofthepeaismodifiedwhenpollenofadifferentlycolouredvarietyisused。ThisconclusionhassincebeenconfirmedbyexperimentsmadebytheRev。J。M。
Berkeley。(11/129。’Gardener’sChronicle’1854page404。)
Mr。LaxtonofStamford,whilstmakingexperimentsonpeasfortheexpresspurposeofascertainingtheinfluenceofforeignpollenonthemother—
plant,hasrecently(11/130。Ibid1866page900。)observedanimportantadditionalfact。HefertilisedtheTallSugar—pea,whichbearsverythingreenpods,becomingbrownish—whitewhendry,withpollenofthePurple—
poddedpea,which,asitsnameexpresses,hasdark—purplepodswithverythickskin,becomingpalereddishpurplewhendry。Mr。Laxtonhascultivatedthetallsugar—peaduringtwentyyears,andhasneverseenorheardofitproducingapurplepod:nevertheless,aflowerfertilisedbypollenfromthepurple—podyieldedapodcloudedwithpurplish—redwhichMr。Laxtonkindlygavetome。Aspaceofabouttwoinchesinlengthtowardstheextremityofthepod,andasmallerspacenearthestalk,werethuscoloured。Oncomparingthecolourwiththatofthepurplepod,bothpodshavingbeenfirstdriedandthensoakedinwater,itwasfoundtobeidenticallythesame;andinboththecolourwasconfinedtothecellslyingimmediatelybeneaththeouterskinofthepod。Thevalvesofthecrossedpodwerealsodecidedlythickerandstrongerthanthoseofthepodsofthemother—plant,butthismaypossiblyhavebeenanaccidentalcircumstance,forIknownothowfartheirthicknessisavariablecharacterintheTallSugar—pea。
ThepeasoftheTallSugar—pea,whendry,arepalegreenish—brown,thicklycoveredwithdotsofdarkpurplesominuteastobevisibleonlythroughalens,andMr。Laxtonhasneverseenorheardofthisvarietyproducingapurplepea;butinthecrossedpodoneofthepeaswasofauniformbeautifulviolet—purpletint,andasecondwasirregularlycloudedwithpalepurple。Thecolourliesintheouterofthetwocoatswhichsurroundthepea。Asthepeasofthepurple—poddedvarietywhendryareofapalegreenish—buff,itwouldatfirstappearthatthisremarkablechangeofcolourinthepeasinthecrossedpodcouldnothavebeencausedbythedirectactionofthepollenofthepurple—pod:butwhenwebearinmindthatthislattervarietyhaspurpleflowers,purplemarksonitsstipules,andpurplepods;andthattheTallSugar—pealikewisehaspurpleflowersandstipules,andmicroscopicallyminutepurpledotsonthepeas,wecanhardlydoubtthatthetendencytotheproductionofpurpleinbothparentshasincombinationmodifiedthecolourofthepeasinthecrossedpod。
Afterhavingexaminedthesespecimens,Icrossedthesametwovarieties,andthepeasinonepodbutnotthepodsthemselves,werecloudedandtintedwithpurplish—redinamuchmoreconspicuousmannerthanthepeasintheuncrossedpodsproducedatthesametimebythesameplants。ImaynoticeasacautionthatMr。Laxtonsentmevariousothercrossedpeasslightly,orevengreatly,modifiedincolour;butthechangeinthesecaseswasdue,ashadbeensuspectedbyMr。Laxton,tothealteredcolourofthecotyledons,seenthroughthetransparentcoatsofthepeas;andasthecotyledonsarepartsoftheembryo,thesecasesarenotinanywayremarkable。
TurningnowtothegenusMatthiola。Thepollenofonekindofstocksometimesaffectsthecolouroftheseedsofanotherkind,usedasthemother—plant。Igivethefollowingcasethemorereadily,asGartnerdoubtedsimilarstatementspreviouslymadewithrespecttothestockbyotherobservers。Awell—knownhorticulturist,MajorTrevorClarke,informsme(11/131。SeealsoapaperbythisobserverreadbeforetheInternationalHort。andBot。CongressofLondon1866。)thattheseedsofthelargered—
floweredBIENNIALstock,Matthiolaannua(CocardeauoftheFrench),arelightbrown,andthoseofthepurplebranchingQueenstock(M。incana)areviolet—black;andhefoundthat,whenflowersoftheredstockwerefertilisedbypollenfromthepurplestock,theyyieldedaboutfiftypercentofBLACKseeds。Hesentmefourpodsfromaredfloweredplant,twoofwhichhadbeenfertilisedbytheirownpollen,andtheyincludedpalebrownseed;andtwowhichhadbeencrossedbypollenfromthepurplekind,andtheyincludedseedsalldeeplytingedwithblack。Theselatterseedsyieldedpurple—floweredplantsliketheirfather;whilstthepalebrownseedsyieldednormalred—floweredplants;andMajorClarke,bysowingsimilarseeds,hasobservedonagreaterscalethesameresult。Theevidenceinthiscaseofthedirectactionofthepollenofonespeciesonthecolouroftheseedsofanotherspeciesappearstomeconclusive。
Gallesio(11/132。’TraiteduCitrus’page40。)fertilisedtheflowersofanorangewithpollenfromthelemon;andonefruitthusproducedborealongitudinalstripeofpeelhavingthecolour,flavour,andothercharactersofthelemon。Mr。Anderson(11/133。’Transact。Hort。Soc。’
volume3page318。Seealsovolume5page65。)fertilisedagreen—fleshedmelonwithpollenfromascarlet—fleshedkind;intwoofthefruits\"asensiblechangewasperceptible:andfourotherfruitsweresomewhatalteredbothinternallyandexternally。\"Theseedsofthetwofirst—
mentionedfruitsproducedplantspartakingofthegoodpropertiesofbothparents。IntheUnitedStates,whereCucurbitaceaearelargelycultivated,itisthepopularbelief(11/134。Prof。AsaGray’Proc。Acad。Sc。’Bostonvolume41860page21。IhavereceivedstatementstothesameeffectfromotherpersonsintheUnitedStates。)thatthefruitisthusdirectlyaffectedhyforeignpollen;andIhavereceivedasimilarstatementwithrespecttothecucumberinEngland。Itisbelievedthatgrapeshavebeenthusaffectedincolour,size,andshape:inFranceapale—colouredgrapehaditsjuicetintedbythepollenofthedark—colouredTeinturier;inGermanyavarietyboreberrieswhichwereaffectedbythepollenoftwoadjoiningkinds;someoftheberriesbeingonlypartiallyaffectedormottled。(11/135。FortheFrenchcasesee’Journ。Hort。Soc。’volume1newseries1866page50。ForGermanyseeM。JackquotedinHenfrey’s’BotanicalGazette’volume1page277。AcaseinEnglandhasrecentlybeenalludedtobytheRev。J。M。BerkeleybeforetheHort。Soc。ofLondon。)
Aslongagoas1751(11/136。’PhilosophicalTransactions’volume471751—52
page206。)itwasobservedthat,whendifferently—colouredvarietiesofmaizegrewneareachother,theymutuallyaffectedeachother’sseeds,andthisisnowapopularbeliefintheUnitedStates。Dr。Savi(11/137。
Gallesio’TeoriadellaRiproduzione’1816page95。)triedtheexperimentwithcare:hesowedyellowandblack—seededmaizetogether,andonthesameearsomeoftheseedswereyellow,someblack,andsomemottled,thedifferentlycolouredseedsbeingarrangedirregularlyorinrows。Prof。
Hildebrandhasrepeatedtheexperiment(11/138。’Bot。Zeitung’May1868
page326。)withtheprecautionofascertainingthatthemother—plantwastrue。Akindbearingyellowgrainswasfertilisedwithpollenofakindhavingbrowngrains,andtwoearsproducedyellowgrainsmingledwithothersofadirtyviolettint。Athirdearhadonlyyellowgrains,butonesideofthespindlewastintedofareddish—brown;sothatherewehavetheimportantfactoftheinfluenceoftheforeignpollenextendingtotheaxis。Mr。Arnold,inCanada,variedtheexperimentinaninterestingmanner:\"afemaleflowerwassubjectedfirsttotheactionofpollenfromayellowvariety,andthentothatfromawhitevariety;theresultwasanear,eachgrainofwhichwasyellowbelowandwhiteabove。\"(11/139。SeeDr。J。Stockton—Hough’AmericanNaturalist’January1874page29。)Withotherplantsithasoccasionallybeenobservedthatthecrossedoffspringshowedtheinfluenceoftwokindsofpollen,butinthiscasethetwokindsaffectedthemother—plant。
Mr。Sabinestates(11/140。’Transact。Hort。Soc。’volume5page69。)thathehasseentheformofthenearlyglobularseed—capsuleofAmaryllisvittataalteredbytheapplicationofthepollenofanotherspecies,ofwhichthecapsulehasgibbousangles。Withanalliedgenus,awell—knownbotanist,Maximowicz,hasdescribedindetailthestrikingresultsofreciprocallyfertilisingLiliumbulbiferumanddavuricumwitheachother’spollen。Eachspeciesproducedfruitnotlikeitsown,butalmostidenticalwiththatofthepollen—bearingspecies;butfromanaccidentonlythefruitofthelatterspecieswascarefullyexamined;theseedswereintermediateinthedevelopmentoftheirwings。(11/141。’Bull。del’Acad。
Imp。deSt。Petersburg’tome17page275,1872。TheauthorgivesreferencestothosecasesintheSo1anaceaeoffruitaffectedbyforeignpollen,butasitdoesnotappearthatthemother—plantwasartificiallyfertilised,I
havenotenteredintodetails。)
FritzMullerfertilisedCattleyaleopoldiwithpollenofEpidendroncinnabarinum;andthecapsulescontainedveryfewseeds;butthesepresentedamostwonderfulappearance,which,fromthedescriptiongiven,twobotanists,HildebrandandMaximowicz,attributetothedirectactionofthepollenoftheEpidendron。(11/142。’Bot。Zeitung’September1868page631。ForMaximowicz’sjudgmentseethepaperlastreferredto。)
Mr。J。AndersonHenry(11/143。’JournalofHorticulture’January20,1863
page46。)crossedRhododendrondalhousiaewiththepollenofR。nuttallii,whichisoneofthelargest—floweredandnoblestspeciesofthegenus。Thelargestpodproducedbytheformerspecies,whenfertilisedwithitsownpollen,measured12/8inchinlengthand11/2ingirth;whilstthreeofthepodswhichhadbeenfertilisedbypollenofR。nuttalliimeasured15/8
inchinlengthandnolessthan2inchesingirth。Heretheeffectoftheforeignpollenwasapparentlyconfinedtoincreasingthesizeoftheovarium;butwemustbecautiousinassuming,asthefollowingcaseshows,thatsizehadbeentransferredfromthemaleparenttothecapsuleofthefemaleplant。Mr。HenryfertilisedArabisblepharophyllawithpollenofA。
soyeri,andthepodsthusproduced,ofwhichhewassokindastosendmedetailedmeasurementsandsketches,weremuchlargerinalltheirdimensionsthanthosenaturallyproducedbyeitherthemaleorfemaleparent—species。Inafuturechapterweshallseethattheorgansofvegetationinhybridplants,independentlyofthecharacterofeitherparent,aresometimesdevelopedtoamonstroussize;andtheincreasedsizeofthepodsintheforegoingcasesmaybeananalogousfact。Ontheotherhand,M。deSaportainformsmethatanisolatedfemaleplantofPistaciaveraisveryapttobefertilisedbythepollenofneighbouringplantsofP。terebinthus,andinthiscasethefruitsareonlyhalftheirpropersize,whichheattributestotheinfluenceofthepollenofP。terebinthus。
Nocaseofthedirectactionofthepollenofonevarietyonanotherisbetterauthenticatedormoreremarkablethanthatofthecommonapple。Thefruithereconsistsofthelowerpartofthecalyxandoftheupperpartoftheflower—peduncle(11/144。SeeonthisheadthehighauthorityofProf。
Decaisneinapapertranslatedin’Journ。Hort。Soc。’volume1newseries1866page48。)inametamorphosedcondition,sothattheeffectoftheforeignpollenhasextendedevenbeyondthelimitsoftheovarium。CasesofapplesthusaffectedwererecordedbyBradleyintheearlypartofthelastcentury;andothercasesaregiveninoldvolumesofthe’PhilosophicalTransactions’(11/145。Volume431744—45page525volume451747—48page602。);inoneoftheseaRussetingappleandanadjoiningkindmutuallyaffectedeachother’sfruit;andinanothercaseasmoothappleaffectedarough—coatedkind。Anotherinstancehasbeengiven(11/146。’Transact。
Hort。Soc。’volume5pages65and68。SeealsoProf。Hildebrandwithacolouredfigurein’Bot。Zeitung’May15,1868page327。Puvisalsohascollected’DeLaDegeneration’1837page36)severalotherinstances;butitisnotinallcasespossibletodistinguishbetweenthedirectactionofforeignpollenandbud—variations。)oftwoverydifferentapple—treesgrowingclosetoeachother,whichborefruitresemblingeachother,butonlyontheadjoiningbranches。Itis,however,almostsuperfluoustoadducetheseorothercases,afterthatoftheSt。Valeryapple,theflowerswhich,fromtheabortionofthestamens,donotproducepollen,butarefertilisedbythegirlsoftheneighbourhoodwithpollenofmanykinds;
andtheybearfruit,\"differingfromoneanotherinsize,flavour,andcolour,butresemblingincharacterthehermaphroditekindsbywhichtheyhavebeenfertilised。\"(11/147。T。deClermont—Tonnerrein’Mem。delaSoc。
Linn。deParis’tome31825page164。)]
Ihavenowshown,ontheauthorityofseveralexcellentobservers,inthecaseofplantsbelongingtowidelydifferentorders,thatthepollenofonespeciesorvariety,whenappliedtothefemaleofadistinctform,occasionallycausesthecoatsoftheseeds,theovariumorfruit,includingeventhecalyxandupperpartofthepeduncleoftheapple,andtheaxisoftheearinmaize,tobemodified。Sometimesthewholeovariumoralltheseedsarethusaffected;sometimesonlyacertainnumberoftheseeds,asinthecaseofthepea,oronlyapartoftheovarium,aswiththestripedorange,mottledgrapes,andmaize,isthusaffected。Itmustnotbesupposedthatanydirectorimmediateeffectinvariablyfollowstheuseofforeignpollen:thisisfarfrombeingthecase;norisitknownonwhatconditionstheresultdepends。Mr。Knight(11/148。’Transact。ofHort。
Soc。’volume5page68。)expresslystatesthathehasneverseenthefruitthusaffected,thoughhecrossedthousandsofappleandotherfruit—trees。
Thereisnottheleastreasontobelievethatabranchwhichhasborneseedorfruitdirectlymodifiedbyforeignpollenisitselfaffected,soasafterwardstoproducemodifiedbuds;suchanoccurrence,fromthetemporaryconnectionoftheflowerwiththestem,wouldbehardlypossible。Hence,butveryfew,ifany,ofthecasesofbud—variationinthefruitoftrees,givenintheearlypartofthischaptercanbeaccountedforbytheactionofforeignpollen;forsuchfruitshavecommonlybeenpropagatedbybuddingorgrafting。Itisalsoobviousthatchangesofcolourinflowers,whichnecessarilysupervenelongbeforetheyarereadyforfertilisation,andchangesintheshapeorcolourofleaves,whenduetotheappearanceofmodifiedbuds,canhavenorelationtotheactionofforeignpollen。
Theproofsoftheactionofforeignpollenonthemother—planthavebeengiveninconsiderabledetail,becausethisaction,asweshallseeinafuturechapter,isofthehighesttheoreticalimportance,andbecauseitisinitselfaremarkableandapparentlyanomalouscircumstance。Thatitisremarkableunderaphysiologicalpointofviewisclear,forthemaleelementnotonlyaffects,inaccordancewithitsproperfunction,thegerm,butatthesametimevariouspartsofthemother—plant,inthesamemanner,asitaffectsthesamepartintheseminaloffspringfromthesametwoparents。Wethuslearnthatanovuleisnotindispensableforthereceptionoftheinfluenceofthemaleelement。Butthisdirectactionofthemaleelementisnotsoanomalousasitatfirstappears,foritcomesintoplayintheordinaryfertilisationofmanyflowers。GartnergraduallyincreasedthenumberofpollengrainsuntilhesucceededinfertilisingaMalva,andhas(11/149。BeitragezurKenntnissderBefruchtung’1844s。347—351。)
provedthatmanygrainsarefirstexpendedinthedevelopment,or,asheexpressesit,inthesatiation,ofthepistilandovarium。Again,whenoneplantisfertilisedbyawidelydistinctspecies,itoftenhappensthattheovariumisfullyandquicklydevelopedwithoutanyseedsbeingformed;orthecoatsoftheseedsareformedwithoutanyembryobeingdevelopedwithin。Prof。Hildebrand,also,haslatelyshown(11/150。’DieFruchtbildungderOrchideen,einBeweisfurdiedoppelteWirkungdesPollens’’BotanischeZeitung’No。44etseq。October30,1865;andAugust4,1865s。249。)that,inthenormalfertilisationofseveralOrchideae,theactionoftheplant’sownpollenisnecessaryforthedevelopmentoftheovarium;andthatthisdevelopmenttakesplacenotonlylongbeforethepollen—tubeshavereachedtheovules,butevenbeforetheplacentaeandovuleshavebeenformed;sothatwiththeseorchidsthepollenactsdirectlyontheovarium。Ontheotherhand,wemustnotoverratetheefficacyofpolleninthecaseofhybridisedplants,foranembryomaybeformedanditsinfluenceexcitethesurroundingtissuesofthemother—
plant,andthenperishataveryearlyageandbethusoverlooked。Again,itiswellknownthatwithmanyplantstheovariummaybefullydeveloped,thoughpollenbewhollyexcluded。Lastly,Mr。Smith,thelateCuratoratKew(asIhearthroughDr。Hooker),observedwithanorchid,theBonateaspeciosa,thesingularfactthatthedevelopmentoftheovariumcouldbeeffectedbythemechanicalirritationofthestigma。Nevertheless,fromthenumberofthepollen—grainsexpended\"inthesatiationoftheovariumandpistil,\"——fromthegeneralityoftheformationoftheovariumandseed—
coatsinhybridisedplantswhichproducenoseeds,——andfromDr。
Hildebrand’sobservationsonorchids,wemayadmitthatinmostcasestheswellingoftheovarium,andtheformationoftheseed—coatsareatleastaided,ifnotwhollycaused,bythedirectactionofthepollen,independentlyoftheinterventionofthefertilisedgerm。Therefore,inthepreviouslygivencaseswehaveonlytobelieveinthefurtherpowerofpollen,whenappliedtoadistinctspeciesorvariety,toinfluencetheshape,size,colour,texture,etc。,ofcertainpartsofthemother—plant。
Turningnowtotheanimalkingdom。Ifwecouldimaginethesameflowertoyieldseedsduringsuccessiveyears,thenitwouldnotbeverysurprisingthataflowerofwhichtheovariumhadbeenmodifiedbyforeignpollenshouldnextyearproduce,whenself—fertilised,offspringmodifiedbythepreviousmaleinfluence。Closelyanalogouscaseshaveactuallyoccurredwithanimals。InthecaseoftenquotedfromLordMorton(11/151。’Philos。
Transact。’1821page20。)anearlypurely—bredArabianchestnutmareboreahybridtoaquagga;shewassubsequentlysenttoSirGoreOuseley,andproducedtwocoltsbyablackArabianhorse。Thesecoltswerepartiallydun—coloured,andwerestripedonthelegsmoreplainlythantherealhybrid,oreventhanthequagga。Oneofthetwocoltshaditsneckandsomeotherpartsofitsbodyplainlymarkedwithstripes。Stripesonthebody,nottomentionthoseonthelegs,areextremelyrare,——Ispeakafterhavinglongattendedtothesubject,——withhorsesofallkindsinEurope,andarealmostunknowninthecaseofArabians。Butwhatmakesthecasestillmorestrikingisthatinthesecoltsthehairofthemaneresembledthatofthequagga,beingshort,stiff,andupright。HencetherecanbenodoubtthatthequaggaaffectedthecharacteroftheoffspringsubsequentlybegotbytheblackArabianhorse。Mr。JennerWeirinformsmeofastrictlyparallelcase:hisneighbourMr。Lethbridge,ofBlackheath,hasahorse,bredbyLordMostyn,whichhadpreviouslyborneafoalbyaquagga。Thishorseisdunwithadarkstripedowntheback,faintstripesontheforeheadbetweentheeyes,plainstripesontheinnersideofthefore—legsandrathermorefaintonesonthehind—legs,withnoshoulder—stripe。Themanegrowsmuchlowerontheforeheadthaninthehorse,butnotsolowasinthequaggaorzebra。Thehoofsareproportionallylongerthaninthehorse,——somuchsothatthefarrierwhofirstshodthisanimal,andknewnothingofitsorigin,said,\"HadInotseenIwasshoeingahorse,IshouldhavethoughtIwasshoeingadonkey。\"
Withrespecttothevarietiesofourdomesticatedanimals,manysimilarandwell—authenticatedfactshavebeenpublished(11/152。Dr。Alex。Harveyon’AremarkableEffectofCross—breeding’1851。Onthe’PhysiologyofBreeding’byMr。ReginaldOrton1855。’Intermarriage’byAlex。Walker1837。
’L’HerediteNaturelle’byDr。ProsperLucastome2page58。Mr。W。Sedgwickin’BritishandForeignMedico—ChirurgicalReview’1863Julypage183。
Bronninhis’GeschichtederNatur’1843b。2s。127hascollectedseveralcaseswithrespecttomares,sows,anddogs。Mr。W。C。L。Martin(’HistoryoftheDog’1845page104)sayshecanpersonallyvouchfortheinfluenceofthemaleparentonsubsequentlittersbyotherdogs。AFrenchpoet,JacquesSavary,whowrotein1665ondogs,wasawareofthissingularfact。Dr。
Bowerbankhasgivenusthefollowingstrikingcase:——Ablack,hairlessBarbarybitchwasfirstaccidentallyimpregnatedbyamongrelspanielwithlongbrownhair,andsheproducedfivepuppies,threeofwhichwerehairlessandtwocoveredwithSHORTbrownhair。Thenexttimeshewasputtoablack,hairlessBarbarydog;\"butthemischiefhadbeenimplantedinthemother,andagainabouthalfthelitterlookedlikepureBarbarys,andtheotherhalfliketheSHORT—hairedprogenyofthefirstfather。\"Ihavegiveninthetextonecasewithpigs;anequallystrikingonehasbeenrecentlypublishedinGermany,’Illust。Landwirth。Zeitung’1868November17page143。ItisworthnoticethatfarmersinS。Brazil(asIhearfromFritzMuller),andattheC。ofGoodHope(asIhaveheardfromtwotrustworthypersons)areconvincedthatmareswhichhaveoncebornemules,whensubsequentlyputtohorses,areextremelyliabletoproducecolts,stripedlikeamule。Dr。WilckensofPogarthgives(’JahrbuchLandwirthschaft’21869page325)astrikingandanalogouscase。Amerinoram,havingtwosmalllappetsorflapsofskinontheneck,wasinthewinterof1861—62puttoseveralMerinoewes,allofwhomborelambswithsimilarflapsontheirnecks。Theramwaskilledinthespringof1862andsubsequentlytohisdeaththeeweswereputtootherMerinorams,andin1863toSouthdownrams,noneofwhomeverhavenecklappets:nevertheless,evenaslongafterwardsas1867,severaloftheseewesproducedlambsbearingtheseappendages。),andothershavebeencommunicatedtome,plainlyshowingtheinfluenceofthefirstmaleontheprogenysubsequentlybornebythemothertoothermales。Itwillsufficetogiveasingleinstance,recordedinthe’PhilosophicalTransactions,’inapaperfollowingthatbyLordMorton:Mr。GilesputasowofLordWestern’sblackandwhiteEssexbreedtoawildboarofadeepchestnutcolour;andthe\"pigsproducedpartookinappearanceofbothboarandsow,butinsomethechestnutcolouroftheboarstronglyprevailed。\"Aftertheboarhadlongbeendead,thesowwasputtoaboarofherownblackandwhitebreed——akindwhichiswellknowntobreedverytrueandnevertoshowanychestnutcolour,——yetfromthisunionthesowproducedsomeyoungpigswhichwereplainlymarkedwiththesamechestnuttintasinthefirstlitter。Similarcaseshavesofrequentlyoccurred,thatcarefulbreedersavoidputtingachoicefemaleofanyanimaltoaninferiormale,onaccountoftheinjurytohersubsequentprogenywhichmaybeexpectedtofollow。
Somephysiologistshaveattemptedtoaccountfortheseremarkableresultsfromapreviousimpregnation,bytheimaginationofthemotherhavingbeenstronglyaffected;butitwillhereafterbeseenthatthereareveryslightgroundsforanysuchbelief。Otherphysiologistsattributetheresulttothecloseattachmentandfreelyintercommunicatingblood—vesselsbetweenthemodifiedembryoandmother。Buttheanalogyfromtheactionofforeignpollenontheovarium,seed—coats,andotherpartsofthemother—plant,stronglysupportsthebeliefthatwithanimalsthemaleelementactsdirectlyonthefemale,andnotthroughthecrossedembryo。Withbirdsthereisnocloseconnectionbetweentheembryoandmother;yetacarefulobserver,Dr。Chapuis,states(11/153。’LePigeonVoyageurBelge’1865page59。)thatwithpigeonstheinfluenceofafirstmalesometimesmakesitselfperceivedinthesucceedingbroods;butthisstatementrequiresconfirmation。
CONCLUSIONANDSUMMARYOFTHECHAPTER。
Thefactsgiveninthelatterhalfofthischapterarewellworthyofconsideration,astheyshowusinhowmanyextraordinarymodestheunionofoneformwithanothermayleadtothemodificationoftheseminaloffspringorofthebuds,afterwardsproduced。
Thereisnothingsurprisingintheoffspringofspeciesorvarietiescrossedintheordinarymannerbeingmodified;butthecaseoftwoplantswithinthesameseed,whichcohereanddifferfromeachother,iscurious。
Whenabudisformedafterthecellulartissueoftwospeciesortwovarietieshavebeenunited,anditpartakesofthecharactersofbothparents,thecaseiswonderful。ButIneednothererepeatwhathasbeensolatelysaidonthissubject。Wehavealsoseenthatinthecaseofplantsthemaleelementmayaffectinadirectmannerthetissuesofthemother,andwithanimalsmayleadtothemodificationofherfutureprogeny。Inthevegetablekingdomtheoffspringfromacrossbetweentwospeciesorvarieties,whethereffectedbyseminalgenerationorbygrafting,oftenrevert,toagreaterorlessdegree,inthefirstorinasucceedinggeneration,tothetwoparent—forms;andthisreversionmayaffectthewholeflower,fruit,orleaf—bud,oronlythehalforasmallersegmentofasingleorgan。Insomecases,however,suchsegregationofcharacterapparentlydependsonanincapacityforunionratherthanonreversion,fortheflowersorfruitwhicharefirstproduceddisplaybysegmentsthecharactersofbothparents。Thevariousfactsheregivenoughttobewellconsideredbyanyonewhowishestoembraceunderasinglepointofviewthemanymodesofreproductionbygemmation,division,andsexualunion,thereparationoflostparts,variation,inheritance,reversion,andothersuchphenomena。TowardsthecloseofthesecondvolumeIshallattempttoconnectthesefactstogetherbythehypothesisofpangenesis。
IntheearlyhalfofthepresentchapterIhavegivenalonglistofplantsinwhichthroughbud—variation,thatis,independentlyofreproductionbyseed,thefruithassuddenlybecomemodifiedinsize,colour,flavour,hairiness,shape,andtimeofmaturity;flowershavesimilarlychangedinshape,colour,inbeingdouble,andgreatlyinthecharacterofthecalyx;
youngbranchesorshootshavechangedincolour,inbearingspinesandinhabitofgrowth,asinclimbingorinweeping;leaveshavechangedinbecomingvariegated,inshape,periodofunfolding,andintheirarrangementontheaxis。Budsofallkinds,whetherproducedonordinarybranchesoronsubterraneanstems,whethersimpleormuchmodifiedandsuppliedwithastockofnutriment,asintubersandbulbs,areallliabletosuddenvariationsofthesamegeneralnature。
Inthelist,manyofthecasesarecertainlyduetoreversiontocharactersnotacquiredfromacross,butwhichwereformerlypresentandhavesincebeenlostforalongerorshortertime;——aswhenabudonavariegatedplantproducesplainleaves,orwhenthevariously—colouredflowersoftheChrysanthemumreverttotheaboriginalyellowtint。Manyothercasesincludedinthelistareprobablyduetotheplantsbeingofcrossedparentage,andtothebudsrevertingeithercompletelyorbysegmentstooneofthetwoparent—forms。(11/154。Itmaybeworthwhiletocallattentiontotheseveralmeansbywhichflowersandfruitbecomestripedormottled。Firstly,bythedirectactionofthepollenofanothervarietyorspecies,asinthecasesgivenoforangesandmaize。Secondly,incrossesofthefirstgeneration,whenthecoloursofthetwoparentsdonotreadilyunite,aswithMirabilisandDianthus。Thirdly,incrossedplantsofasubsequentgenerationbyreversion,througheitherbudorseminalgeneration。Fourthly,byreversiontoacharacternotoriginallygainedbyacross,butwhichhadlongbeenlost,aswithwhite—floweredvarieties,whichweshallhereafterseeoftenbecomestripedwithsomeothercolour。
Lastly,therearecases,aswhenpeachesareproducedwithahalforquarterofthefruitlikeanectarine,inwhichthechangeisapparentlyduetomerevariation,througheitherbudorseminalgeneration。)
WemaysuspectthatthestrongtendencyintheChrysanthemumtoproducebybud—variationdifferently—colouredflowers,resultsfromthevarietieshavingbeenatsometimeintentionallyoraccidentallycrossed;andthisiscertainlythecasewithsomekindsofPelargonium。Soitmaybetoalargeextentwiththebud—varietiesoftheDahlia,andwiththe\"brokencolours\"ofTulips。When,however,aplantrevertsbybud—variationtoitstwoparentforms,ortooneofthem,itsometimesdoesnotrevertperfectly,butassumesasomewhatnewcharacter,——ofwhichfact,instanceshavebeengiven,andCarrieregives(11/155。’ProductiondesVarietes’page37。)
anotherinthecherry。
Manycasesofbud—variation,however,cannotbeattributedtoreversion,buttoso—calledspontaneousvariability,asissocommonwithcultivatedplantsraisedfromseed。AsasinglevarietyoftheChrysanthemumhasproducedbybudssixothervarieties,andasonevarietyofthegooseberryhasborneatthesametimefourdistinctkindsoffruit,itisscarcelypossibletobelievethatallthesevariationsareduetoreversion。Wecanhardlybelieve,asremarkedinapreviouschapter,thatallthemanypeacheswhichhaveyieldednectarine—budsareofcrossedparentage。Lastly,insuchcasesasthatofthemoss—rose,withitspeculiarcalyx,andoftherosewhichbearsoppositeleaves,inthatoftheImatophyllum,etc。,thereisnoknownnaturalspeciesorvarietyfromwhichthecharactersinquestioncouldhavebeenderivedbyacross。Wemustattributeallsuchcasestotheappearanceofabsolutelynewcharactersinthebuds。Thevarietieswhichhavethusarisencannotbedistinguishedbyanyexternalcharacterfromseedlings;thisisnotoriouslythecasewiththevarietiesoftheRose,Azalea,andmanyotherplants。Itdeservesnoticethatalltheplantswhichhaveyieldedbud—variationshavelikewisevariedgreatlybyseed。
Theplantswhichhavevariedbybudsbelongtosomanyordersthatwemayinferthatalmosteveryplantwouldbeliabletovariation,ifplacedundertheproperexcitingconditions。Theseconditions,asfaraswecanjudge,mainlydependonlong—continuedandhighcultivation;foralmostalltheplantsintheforegoinglistareperennials,andhavebeenlargelypropagatedinmanysoils,underdifferentclimates,bycuttings,offsets,bulbs,tubers,andespeciallybybuddingorgrafting。Theinstancesofannualsvaryingbybuds,orproducingonthesameplantdifferentlycolouredflowers,arecomparativelyrare:Hopkirk(11/156。’FloraAnomala’
page164。)hasseenthiswithConvolvulustricolor;anditisnotuncommonwiththeBalsamandannualDelphinium。AccordingtoSirR。Schomburgk,plantsfromthewarmertemperateregions,whencultivatedunderthehotclimateofSt。Domingo,areeminentlyliabletobud—variation。IaminformedbyMr。Sedgwickthatmoss—roseswhichhaveoftenbeentakentoCalcuttaalwaystherelosetheirmossiness;butchangeofclimateisbynomeansanecessarycontingent,asweseewiththegooseberry,currant,andinmanyothercases。Plantslivingundertheirnaturalconditionsareveryrarelysubjecttobud—variation。Variegatedleaveshave,however,beenobservedundersuchcircumstances;andIhavegivenaninstanceofvariationbybudsonanash—treeplantedinornamentalgrounds,butitisdoubtfulwhethersuchatreecanbeconsideredaslivingunderstrictlynaturalconditions。Gartnerhasseenwhiteanddark—redflowersproducedfromthesamerootofthewildAchilleamillefolium;andProf。CasparyhasseenacompletelywildViolaluteabearingflowersoftwodifferentcoloursandsizes。(11/157。’Schriftenderphysisch—okon。Gesell。zuKonigsberg’b。
6February3,1865s。4。)
Aswildplantsaresorarelyliabletobud—variation,whilsthighlycultivatedplantslongpropagatedbyartificialmeanshaveyieldedmanyvarietiesbythisformofreproduction,weareledthroughaseriessuchasthefollowing,——namely,alltheeyesinthesametuberofthepotatovaryinginthesamemanner,——allthefruitonapurpleplum—treesuddenlybecomingyellow,——allthefruitonadouble—floweredalmondsuddenlybecomingpeachlike,——allthebudsongraftedtreesbeinginaveryslightdegreeaffectedbythestockonwhichtheyhavebeenworked,——alltheflowersonatransplantedheartseasechangingforatimeincolour,size,andshape,——weareledbysuchaseriestolookateverycaseofbud—
variationasthedirectresultoftheconditionsoflifetowhichtheplanthasbeenexposed。Ontheotherhand,plantsofthesamevarietymaybecultivatedintwoadjoiningbeds,apparentlyunderexactlythesameconditions,andthoseintheonebed,asCarriereinsists(11/158。
’ProductiondesVarietes’pages58,70。)willproducemanybud—variations,andthoseintheothernotasingleone。Again,ifwelooktosuchcasesasthatofapeach—treewhich,afterhavingbeencultivatedbytensofthousandsduringmanyyearsinmanycountries,andafterhavingannuallyproducedmillionsofbuds,allofwhichhaveapparentlybeenexposedtopreciselythesameconditions,yetatlastsuddenlyproducesasinglebudwithitswholecharactergreatlytransformed,wearedriventotheconclusionthatthetransformationstandsinnoDIRECTrelationtotheconditionsoflife。
Wehaveseenthatvarietiesproducedfromseedsandfrombudsresembleeachothersocloselyingeneralappearancethattheycannotbedistinguished。
Justascertainspeciesandgroupsofspecies,whenpropagatedbyseed,aremorevariablethanotherspeciesorgenera,soitisinthecaseofcertainbud—varieties。Thus,theQueenofEnglandChrysanthemumhasproducedbythislatterprocessnolessthansix,andRollisson’sUniquePelargoniumfourdistinctvarieties;moss—roseshavealsoproducedseveralothermoss—
roses。TheRosaceaehavevariedbybudsmorethananyothergroupofplants;butthismaybeinlargepartduetosomanymembershavingbeenlongcultivated;butwithinthissamegroup,thepeachhasoftenvariedbybuds,whilsttheappleandpear,bothgraftedtreesextensivelycultivated,haveafforded,asfarasIcanascertain,extremelyfewinstancesofbud—
variation。
Thelawofanalogousvariationholdsgoodwithvarietiesproducedbybuds,aswiththoseproducedfromseed:morethanonekindofrosehassportedintoamoss—rose;morethanonekindofcamelliahasassumedanhexagonalform;andatleastsevenoreightvarietiesofthepeachhaveproducednectarines。
Thelawsofinheritanceseemtobenearlythesamewithseminalandbud—
varieties。Weknowhowcommonlyreversioncomesintoplaywithboth,anditmayaffectthewhole,oronlysegmentsofaleaf,flower,orfruit。Whenthetendencytoreversionaffectsmanybudsonthesametree,itbecomescoveredwithdifferentkindsofleaves,flowers,orfruit;butthereisreasontobelievethatsuchfluctuatingvarietieshavegenerallyarisenfromseed。Itiswellknownthat,outofanumberofseedlingvarieties,sometransmittheircharactermuchmoretrulybyseedthanothers;sowithbud—varieties,someretaintheircharacterbysuccessivebudsmoretrulythanothers;ofwhichinstanceshavebeengivenwithtwokindsofvariegatedEuonymusandwithcertainkindsoftulipsandpelargoniums。
Notwithstandingthesuddenproductionofbud—varieties,thecharactersthusacquiredaresometimescapableoftransmissionbyseminalreproduction:Mr。
Rivershasfoundthatmoss—rosesgenerallyreproducethemselvesbyseed;
andthemossycharacterhasbeentransferredbycrossingfromonespeciesofrosetoanother。TheBostonnectarine,whichappearedasabud—
variation,producedbyseedacloselyalliednectarine。Ontheotherhand,seedlingsfromsomebud—variationshaveprovedvariabletoanextremedegree。(11/159。Carriere’ProductiondesVarietes’page39。)Wehavealsoheard,ontheauthorityofMr。Salter,thatseedstakenfromabranchwithleavesvariegatedthroughbud—variation,transmitthischaracterveryfeebly;whilstmanyplants,whichwerevariegatedasseedlings,transmitvariegationtoalargeproportionoftheirprogeny。
AlthoughIhavebeenabletocollectagoodmanycasesofbud—variation,asshowninthepreviouslists,andmightprobably,bysearchingforeignhorticulturalworks,havecollectedverymanymorecases,yettheirtotalnumberisasnothingincomparisonwiththatofseminalvarieties。Withseedlingsraisedfromthemorevariablecultivatedplants,thevariationsarealmostinfinitelynumerous,buttheirdifferencesaregenerallyslight:
onlyatlongintervalsoftimeastronglymarkedmodificationappears。Ontheotherhand,itisasingularandinexplicablefactthat,whenplantsvarybybuds,thevariations,thoughtheyoccurwithcomparativerarity,areoften,orevengenerally,stronglypronounced。Itstruckmethatthismightperhapsbeadelusion,andthatslightchangesoftenoccurredinbuds,butwereoverlookedornotrecordedfrombeingofnovalue。
Accordingly,Iappliedtotwogreatauthoritiesonthissubject,namely,toMr。Riverswithrespecttofruit—trees,andtoMr。Salterwithrespecttoflowers。Mr。Riversisdoubtful,butdoesnotrememberhavingnoticedveryslightvariationsinfruit—buds。Mr。Salterinformsmethatwithflowerssuchdooccur,but,ifpropagated,theygenerallylosetheirnewcharacterinthefollowingyear;yetheconcurswithmethatbud—variationsusuallyatonceassumeadecidedandpermanentcharacter。Wecanhardlydoubtthatthisistherule,whenwereflectonsuchcasesasthatofthepeach,whichhasbeensocarefullyobserved,andofwhichsuchtriflingseminalvarietieshavebeenpropagated,yetthistreehasrepeatedlyproducedbybud—variationnectarines,andonlytwice(asfarasIcanlearn)anyothervariety,namely,theEarlyandLateGrosseMignonnepeaches;andthesedifferfromtheparent—treeinhardlyanycharacterexcepttheperiodofmaturity。
Tomysurprise,IhearfromMr。Salterthathebringstheprincipleofselectiontobearonvariegatedplantspropagatedbybuds,andhasthusgreatlyimprovedandfixedseveralvarieties。Heinformsmethatatfirstabranchoftenproducesvariegatedleavesononesidealone,andthattheleavesaremarkedonlywithanirregularedgingorwithafewlinesofwhiteandyellow。Toimproveandfixsuchvarieties,hefindsitnecessarytoencouragethebudsatthebasesofthemostdistinctlymarkedleaves,andtopropagatefromthemalone。Byfollowingwithperseverancethisplanduringthreeorfoursuccessiveseasons,adistinctandfixedvarietycangenerallybesecured。
Finally,thefactsgiveninthischapterproveinhowcloseandremarkableamannerthegermofafertilisedseedandthesmallcellularmassformingabud,resembleeachotherinalltheirfunctions——intheirpowerofinheritancewithoccasionalreversion,——andintheircapacityforvariationofthesamegeneralnature,inobediencetothesamelaws。Thisresemblance,orratheridentityofcharacter,isshowninthemoststrikingmannerbythefactthatthecellulartissueofonespeciesorvariety,whenbuddedorgraftedonanother,maygiverisetoabudhavinganintermediatecharacter。Wehaveseenthatvariabilitydoesnotdependonsexualgeneration,thoughmuchmorefrequentlyitsconcomitantthanofbudreproduction。Wehaveseenthatbud—variabilityisnotsolelydependentonreversionoratavismtolong—lostcharacters,ortothoseformerlyacquiredfromacross,butappearsoftentobespontaneous。Butwhenweaskourselveswhatisthecauseofanyparticularbud—variation,wearelostindoubt,beingdriveninsomecasestolooktothedirectactionoftheexternalconditionsoflifeassufficient,andinothercasestofeelaprofoundconvictionthatthesehaveplayedaquitesubordinatepart,ofnotmoreimportancethanthenatureofthesparkwhichignitesamassofcombustiblematter。
CHAPTER1。XII。
INHERITANCE。
WONDERFULNATUREOFINHERITANCE。
PEDIGREESOFOURDOMESTICATEDANIMALS。
INHERITANCENOTDUETOCHANCE。
TRIFLINGCHARACTERSINHERITED。
DISEASESINHERITED。
PECULIARITIESINTHEEYEINHERITED。
DISEASESINTHEHORSE。
LONGEVITYANDVIGOUR。
ASYMMETRICALDEVIATIONSOFSTRUCTURE。
POLYDACTYLISMANDREGROWTHOFSUPERNUMERARYDIGITSAFTERAMPUTATION。
CASESOFSEVERALCHILDRENSIMILARLYAFFECTEDFROMNON—AFFECTEDPARENTS。
WEAKANDFLUCTUATINGINHERITANCE:INWEEPINGTREES,INDWARFNESS,COLOUROF
FRUITANDFLOWERS。
COLOUROFHORSES。
NON—INHERITANCEINCERTAINCASES。
INHERITANCEOFSTRUCTUREANDHABITSOVERBORNEBYHOSTILECONDITIONSOF
LIFE,BYINCESSANTLYRECURRINGVARIABILITY,ANDBYREVERSION。
CONCLUSION。
Thesubjectofinheritanceisanimmenseone,andhasbeentreatedbymanyauthors。Oneworkalone,’Del’HerediteNaturelle’byDr。ProsperLucas,runstothelengthof1562pages。Wemustconfineourselvestocertainpointswhichhaveanimportantbearingonthegeneralsubjectofvariation,bothwithdomesticandnaturalproductions。Itisobviousthatavariationwhichisnotinheritedthrowsnolightonthederivationofspecies,norisofanyservicetoman,exceptinthecaseofperennialplants,whichcanbepropagatedbybuds。