第5章
加入书架 A- A+
点击下载App,搜索"A STUDY OF THE BIBLE",免费读到尾

  allpoliticalwriting,withVoltaireandWebster。

  NearthatsamefieldmustliemanyofthoseessaysincriticismofwhichProfessorDowdenspeaks。Thiswhichweomit,thisliteratureofknowledge,ispowerfulliterature,thoughitsmainpurposeisnottomove,buttoteach。

  Weareonlyreducingourfieldsothatwecansurveyit。Forourusesjustnowweshallfindpureliteraturetakingthethreestandardforms:thepoem,theessay,andthestory。ItistheinfluenceoftheEnglishBibleonthislargefieldofliteraturewhichwearetoobserve。

  Justforsafety\'ssake,acceptanothernarrowingofthefield。TheeffectoftheBibleanditsreligiousteaching,onthewriterhimselfisaseparatestudy,andisforthemostpartleftoutofconsideration。ItsoundscorrectwhenMiltonsays:\"HewhowouldnotbefrustrateofhisPowertowritewelloughthimselftobeatruepoem。\"ButthereisMiltonhimselftodealwith;irreproachableinmorals,thereareyettheunhappyyearsofhisyoungwifetotroubleus,andtherewerehisdaughters,whowerenotatpeacewithhim,andwhomaftertheirserviceinhisblindnessheyetstigmatizesinhiswillas\"undutifulchildren。\"Then,ifyouthinkofShelleyorByron,youaretroubledbytheirlives;orevenCarlyle,theverymasteroftheVictorianera——onewouldnotliketoscanhislifeaccordingtothelawsoftruepoetry。

  ThenthereisColeridge,fallingapreytoopiumuntil,asyearscame,conscienceandwillseemedtogo。OnlyaveryardentScotwillfeelthathecandefendRobertBurnsatallpoints,andwewouldbestrangeAmericansifwefeltthatEdgarAllenPoewasamodelofpropriety。Thatisalargeandinterestingfield,buttheBibleseemseventogainpowerasabook-makingbookwhenitlaysholdonthebook-makingproclivitiesofmenwhoarenotpreparedtoyieldtoitspersonalpower。Theymaygetawayfromitasreligion;theydonotgetawayfromitasliterature。

  ThefirstandmostnotablefactregardingtheinfluenceoftheBibleonEnglishliteratureistheremarkableextentofthatinfluence。Itisliterallyeverywhere。IfeveryBibleinanyconsiderablecityweredestroyed,theBookcouldberestoredinallitsessentialpartsfromthequotationsontheshelvesofthecitypubliclibrary。Thereareworks,coveringalmostallthegreatliterarywriters,devotedespeciallytoshowinghowmuchtheBiblehasinfluencedthem。

  TheliteraryeffectoftheKingJamesversionatfirstwaslessthanitssocialeffect;butinthatveryfactliesastrikingliteraryinfluence。

  ForalongtimeitformedvirtuallythewholeliteraturewhichwasreadilyaccessibletoordinaryEnglishmen。Wegetourphrasesfromathousandbooks。Thecommontalkofanintelligentmanshowstheeffectofmanyauthorsuponhisthinking。Ourfathersgottheirphrasesfromonegreatbook。Theirwritingandtheirspeakingshowtheeffectofthatbook。

  Itisastudybyitself,andyetitistruethatworldliteratureis,asProfessorMoultonputsit,theautobiographyofcivilization。\"Anationalliteratureisareflectionofthenationalhistory。\"

  Booksasbooksreflecttheirauthors。Asliteraturetheyreflectthepublicopinionwhichgivesthemindorsement。When,therefore,publicopinion:keepsaliveacertaingroupofbooks,thereistestimonynotsimplytothosebooks,buttothepublicopinionwhichhaspreservedthem。Thehistoryofpopularestimatesofliteratureisitselfmostinteresting。Ontheotherhand,somewritershavebeenamusinglyoverestimated。

  NodoubtEdwardFitzgerald,whogaveusthe\"RubaiyatofOmarKhayyam\"didsomeotherdesirablework;butProfessorMoultonquotesthisparagraphfromapopularlifeofFitzgerald,publishedinDublin:\"NotGreeceofoldinherpalmiestdays——theGreeceofHomerandDemosthenes,ofEschylus,Euripides,andSophocles,ofPericles,Leonidas,andAlcibiades,ofSocrates,Plato,andAristotle,ofSolonandLycurgus,ofApellesandPraxiteles——noteventhisGreece,prolificasshewasinsagesandheroes,canboastsuchalengthybead-rollasIrelandcanofnamesimmortalinhistory!\"

  But\"thiswasforIrishconsumption。\"Andpopularopinionandevencriticalopinionhassometimesgonefarastrayinitsdestructivetendency。TherewereauthoritativecriticswhodeclaredthatWordsworth,Shelley,andColeridgewrote\"unintelligiblenonsense。\"GeorgeMeredith\'sstyle,especiallyinhispoetry,wascountedsobadthatit——wasnotworthreading。

  WeareallnearenoughtheBrowningepochtorecallhowtheobscurityofhisstyleimpressedsomeandoppressedothers。AlfredAustin,in1869,saidthat\"Mr。Tennysonhasnosoundpretensionstobecalledagreatpoet。\"

  Contemporarypublicopinionisseldomafinalgaugeofstrengthforapieceofliterature。Ittakesthetestoftime。Howmanybookswehaveseencomeonthestageandthenpassoffagain!Yetthebooksthathavestayedonthestagehavebeenkepttherebypublicopinionexpressingitselfinthelongrun。ThesocialinfluenceoftheKingJamesversion,creatingapublictasteforcertaintypesofliterature,tendedtoproducethematonce。

  EnglishliteratureinthesethreehundredyearshasfoundintheBiblethreeinfluentialelements:style,language,andmaterial。

  First,thestyleoftheKingJamesversionhasinfluencedEnglishliteraturemarkedly。ProfessorGardineropensoneofhisessayswiththedictumthat\"inallstudyofEnglishliterature,iftherebeanyoneaxiomwhichmaybeacceptedwithoutquestion,itisthattheultimatestandardofEnglishprosestyleissetbytheKingJamesversionoftheBible。\"[1]Youalmostmeasurethestrengthofwritingbyitsagreementwiththepredominanttraitsofthisversion。

  Carlyle\'sweakestworksarethosethatlosethehonestsimplicityofitsstyleinaforcedturgidityandaffectedroughness。HisHeroesandHeroWorshiporhisFrenchRevolutionshowshisdistinctivestyle,andyetshowstheinfluenceofthissimplerstyle,whilehisFredericktheGreatisalmostimpossiblebecausehehasgivenfullplaytohisbrokenanddisconnectedsentences。Ontheotherhand,Macaulayfailsusmostinhisstrivingforeffect,makingnicebalanceofsentences,straininghis\"either-or,\"

  orhis\"while-one-was-doing-this-the-other-was-

  doing-that。\"Thenhissentencesgrowinvolved,andhisparagraphslengthen,andheswingsawayfromthestyleoftheKingJamesversion。

  \"OnecansaythatifanywritingdepartsveryfarfromthecharacteristicsoftheEnglishBibleitisnotgoodEnglishwriting。\"

  [1]AtlanticMonthly,May,1900,p。684。

  ThesecondelementwhichEnglishliteraturefindsintheBibleisitsLANGUAGE。ThewordsoftheBiblearethefamiliaronesoftheEnglishtongue,andhavebeenkeptfamiliarbytheuseoftheBible。Theresultisthat\"thepathofliteratureliesparalleltothatofreligion。Theyareoldanddearcompanions,brethrenindeedofoneblood;notalwaysagreeing,tobesure;

  squabblingratherintruebrotherlyfashionnowandthen;occasionallyfallingoutveryseriouslyandbitterly;butstillinterdependentandnecessarytoeachother。\"[1]YearsagoawriterremarkedthateverystudentofEnglishliterature,orofEnglishspeech,findsthreeworksorsubjectsreferredto,orquotedfrom,morefrequentlythanothers。ThesearetheBible,talesofGreekandRomanmythology,andAesop\'sFables。Ofthesethree,certainlytheBiblefurnishesthelargestnumberofreferences。Thereisreasonforthat。Awriterwantsanaudience。Veryfewmencanclaimtobeindependentofthepublicforwhichtheywrite。ThereisnothingthepublicwillbemoreapttounderstandandappreciatequicklythanapassingreferencetotheEnglishBible。SoitcomesaboutthatwhenDickensisdescribingtheinjusticeoftheMurdstonestolittleDavidCopperfield,hecanputthewholematterbeforeusinaparenthesis:

  \"ThoughtherewasOneoncewhosetachildinthemidstofthedisciples。\"Dickensknewthathisreaderswouldatoncecatchthemeaningofthatreference,andwouldfeelthecontrastbetweenthescenehewasdescribingandthatsimplescene。TakeanyofthegreatbooksofliteratureandblackoutthephraseswhichmanifestlycomedirectlyfromtheEnglishBible,andyouwouldmarkthembeyondrecovery。

  [1]Chapman,EnglishLiteratureinAccountwithReligion。

  ButEnglishliteraturehasfoundmoreofitsmaterialintheBiblethananythingelse。Ithaslookedthereforitscharacters,itsillustrations,itssubject-matter。Weshallsee,asweconsiderindividualwriters,howmanyoftheirtitlesandcompleteworksaresuggestedbytheBible。

  ItisinterestingtoseehowoneideaoftheScripturewillappearandreappearamongmanywriters。Takeoneillustration。TheFauststoryisanefforttomakeconcreteoneverseofScripture:

  \"Whatshallitprofitamanifheshallgainthewholeworldandlosehisownsoul?\"

  ProfessorMoultonremindsusthattheFaustlegendappearedfirstintheMiddleAges。InearlyEnglish,Marlowehasit,CalderonputitintoSpanish,themostfamiliarformofitisGoethe\'s,whilePhilipBaileyhascalledhisaccountofitFestus。Ineachofthoseformsthesameideaoccurs。Amansellshissoultothedevilforthegainingofwhatistohimtheworld。ThatisoneofagoodmanyideaswhichtheBiblehasgiventoliterature。Theprodigalsonhasbeenanotherprolificsourceofliterarywriting。Theguidingstarisanother。Otherswillreadilycometomind。

  Withthatsimplebackgroundletourmindsmovedownthecourseofliteraryhistory。Style,language,material——wewilleasilythinkhowmuchofeachtheBiblehasgiventoallourgreatwritersiftheirnamesareonlymentioned。Therearefourgroupsofthesewriters。

  1。TheJacobean,whowrotewhenandjustafterourversionwasmade。

  2。TheGeorgian,whogracedthereignsofthekingswhosenametheperiodbears。

  3。TheVictorian。

  4。TheAmerican。

  Thereisanattractivefifthgroupcomprisingourpresent-dayworkersintherealmofpureliterature,butwemustomitthemandgiveourattentiontonamesthatarestarred。

  ItisfamiliarthatinthetimeofElizabeth,\"Englandbecameanestofsingingbirds。\"InthefiftyyearsafterthefirstEnglishtheaterwaserected,themiddleofElizabeth\'sreign,fiftydramaticpoetsappeared,manyofthefirstorder。Someweredistinctlyirreligious,asweremanyofthepeoplewhoselivestheytouched。

  SuchmenasFord,Marlowe,Massinger,Webster,Beaumont,andFletcherstandlikeachorusaroundShakespeareandBenJonsonasleaders。

  AsTaineputsit:\"Theysingthesamepiecetogether,andattimesthechorusisequaltothesolo;butonlyattimes。\"[1]Culturedpeopleto-dayknowthenamesofmostofthesewriters,butnotmuchelse,anditdoesnotheavilyserveourargumenttosaythattheyfeltthePuritaninfluence;buttheyalldidfeeliteitherdirectlyorbyreaction。

  [1]HistoryofEnglishLiterature,chap。iii。

  EdmundSpenserandhisfriend,SirPhilipSidney,hadclosedtheirworkbeforetheKingJamesversionappeared,yettheFaerieQueeneinitsreligioustheoryisPuritantothecore,andSidneyisbestrememberedbyhisparaphrasesofScripture。TheinfluenceofbothwasevengreaterintheJacobeanthanintheirownperiod。

  ItishardlyfaireventonotetheElizabethanShakespeareasundertheinfluenceoftheKingJamesversion。TheBibleinfluencedhimmarkedly,butitwastheGenevanversionpreparedduringtheexileofthescholarsunderBloodyMary,ortheBishops\'BiblepreparedunderElizabeth。Thoseversionswerefamiliarashouseholdfactstohim。\"NowriterhasassimilatedthethoughtsandreproducedthewordsofHolyScripturemorecopiouslythanShakespeare。\"Dr。Furnivallsaysthat\"heissaturatedwiththeBiblestory,\"andacenturyagoCapelLloftsaidquaintlythatShakespeare\"haddeeplyimbibedtheScriptures。\"ButtheKingJamesversionappearedonlyfiveyearsbeforehisdeath,anditisinsomesensefairertosaythatShakespeareandtheKingJamesversionareformedbythesameinfluenceastotheirEnglishstyle。TheBishopofSt。

  AndrewsevendevotesthefirstpartofhisbookonShakespeareandtheBibletoastudyofparallelsbetweenthetwoinpeculiarformsofspeech,andthinksit\"probablethatourtranslatorsof1611owedasmuchtoShakespeareas,orratherfarmorethan,heowedtothem。\"[1]

  Itisgenerallyagreedthatonlytwoofhisworkswerewrittenafterourversionappeared。SeveralotherwritershavedevotedseparatevolumestonotingthefrequentusebyShakespeareofBiblicalphrasesandallusionsandcharacterstakenfromearlyversions。Itisaverytemptingfield,andwepassitbyonlybecauseitishardlyintherangeofthestudywearenowmaking。

  [1]Wordsworth,Shakespeare\'sKnowledgeandUseoftheBible,p。

  9。

  When,however,wecometoJohnMilton1608-1674,werememberhewasonlythreeyearsoldwhenourversionwasissued;thatwhenatfifteen,anundergraduateinCambridge,hemadehisfirstparaphrases,castingtwoofthePsalmsintometer,theversionheusedwasthisfamiliarone。AbiographersayshebeganthedayalwayswiththereadingofScriptureandkepthismemorydeeplychargedwithitsphrases。

  InlaterlifethemorningchapterwasgenerallyfromtheHebrew,andwasfollowedbyanhourofsilenceformeditation,anexercisewhoseinfluencenoman\'sstylecouldescape。AsawriterhemovedsteadilytowardtheScriptureandthereligiousteachingwhichitbroughthisage。Hisearlierwritingisagroupofpoemslargelysecular,whichyetshowinphrasesandexpressionsmuchoftheinfluenceofhisboyhoodstudyoftheBible,aswellasthefamiliaruseofmythology。Thememorialpoem\"Lycidas,\"

  forexample,containsthemuch-quotedreferencetoPeterandhistwokeys——

  \"LastcameandlastdidgoThepilotoftheGalileanlake;

  Twomassykeysheboreofmetalstwain,Thegoldenopes,theironshutsamain。\"

  Butafterthesepoemscametheperiodofhisprose,theworkwhichhesupposedwastheabidingworkofhislife。GeorgeWilliamCurtistoldafriendthatourcivilwarchangedhisownliterarystyle:\"ThatrousedmetoseethatI

  hadnorighttospendmylifeinliteraryleisure。

  IfeltthatImustthrowmyselfintothestruggleforfreedomandtheUnion。Ibegantolectureandtowrite。Thestyletookcareofitself。

  ButIfancyitismoresolidthanitwasthirtyyearsago。\"ThatiswhathappenedtoMiltonwhentheprotectoratecame。[1]Itmadehisstylemoresolid。Hedidnotmeantoliveasapoet。

  Hefeltthathisbestenergieswerebeingputintohisessaysindefenseofliberty,onthefreedomofthepressandonthejusticeofthebeheadingofCharles,inwhichservicehesacrificedhissight。AllofitisshotthroughwithScripturequotationsandarguments,andsomeofit,atleast,isintheveryspiritofScripture。Thepleaforlargerfreedomofdivorceissuedplainlyfromhisownbitterexperience;buthismainargumentrootsinafewBibletextstakenoutoftheirconnectionandurgedwithnoshadowofquestionoftheirauthority。Indeed,whenhecomestohismorereligiousessays,hisheavyargumentisthatthereshouldbenoreligionpermittedinEnglandwhichisnotdrawndirectlyfromtheBible;which,therefore,heurgesmustbecommonpropertyforallthepeople。

  Thereisacuriousbitofevidencethatthemenofhisowntimedidnotrealizehispowerasapoet。InPierreBayle\'scriticalsurveyoftheliteratureofthetime,hecallsMilton\"thefamousapologistfortheexecutionofCharlesI。,\"who\"meddledinpoetryandseveralofwhosepoemssawthelightduringhislifeorafterhisdeath!\"Forallthat,Miltonwasonlyworkingontowardhisrealpower,andhispowerwastobeshowninhisservicetoreligion。Histhreegreatpoems,intheorderoftheirvalue,are,ofcourse,\"ParadiseLost,\"\"SamsonAgonistes,\"

  and\"ParadiseRegained。\"WhoeverknowsanythingofMiltonknowsthesethreeandknowstheyareScripturalfromfirsttolastinphrase,inallusion,and,inpartatleast,inidea。Thereisnottimeforextendedillustration。Oneinstancemaystandforall,whichshallillustratehowMilton\'smindwaslikeagardenwheretheseedsofScripturecametoflowerandfruit。HewilltakeonephrasefromtheBibleandletitgrowtoapagein\"ParadiseLost。\"Hereisanillustrationwhichcomesreadilytohand。IntheGenesisitissaidthat\"thespiritofGodmovedonthefaceofthewaters。\"Theverbsuggeststheideaofbrooding。ThereisonlyoneotherpossiblereferencePsalmxxiv:9。

  whichisincludedinthisstatementwhichMiltonmakesoutofthatbriefwordintheGenesis:

  \"OnthewaterycalmHisbroadeningwingstheSpiritofGodoutspread,Andvitalvirtueinfused,andvitalwarmthThroughoutthefluidmass,butdownwardpurgedTheblacktartareouscoldinfernaldregs,Adversetolife;thenformed,thencon-globed,Likethingstolike;theresttoseveralplaceDisparted,andbetweenspunouttheair——

  Andearthself-balancedonhercenterswung。\"

  [1]Strong,TheTheologyofthePoets。

  AnyonefamiliarwithMiltonwillrecognizethatasatypicalinstanceofthewayinwhichaseedideafromtheScripturecomestoflowerandfruitinhim。TheresultisthatmorepeoplehavetheirideasaboutheavenandhellfromMiltonthanfromtheBible,thoughtheydonotknowit。

  ItseemshardlyfairtouseJohnBunyan1628-1688asanillustrationoftheinfluenceoftheEnglishBibleonliterature,becausehischiefworkiscomposedsolargelyinthelanguageofScripture。Pilgrim\'sProgressisthemostwidelyreadbookintheEnglishlanguageaftertheBible。Itsphrases,itsnames,itsmatterareeitherdirectlyorindirectlytakenfromtheBible。Ithasgivenusalonglistofphraseswhicharepartofourliteraryandreligiouscapital。Thackeraytookthemottoofoneofhisbest-knownbooksfromtheBible;butthetitle,VanityFair,comesfromPilgrim\'sProgress。

  Whenadiscouragedmansaysheis\"inthesloughofdespond,\"hequotesBunyan;andwhenapopularevangelisttellsthepeoplethattheburdenofsinwillrollawayiftheylookatthecross,\"accordingtotheBible,\"heoughttosayaccordingtoBunyan。ButallthiswasonlytheoutcomeofthefamiliarityofBunyanwiththeScripture。Itwasalmostallhedidknowinaliteraryway。Macaulaysaysthat\"heknewnolanguagebuttheEnglishasitwasspokenbythecommonpeople;hehadstudiednogreatmodelofcomposition,withtheexceptionofournobletranslationoftheBible。

  Butofthathisknowledgewassuchthathemighthavebeencalledalivingconcordance。\"[1]

  [1]HistoryofEngland,vol。III。,p。220。

  Afterthesethree——Shakespeare,Milton,andBunyan——thereappearedanotherthree,verymuchtheirinferiorsandhavingmuchlessinfluenceonliteraryhistory。ImeanDryden,Addison,andPope。ItisnotnecessarytocredittheScripturewithmuchofDryden\'sspirit,norwithmuchofhisstyle,andcertainlynotwithhisattitudetowardhisfellows;butitisaconstantsurpriseinreadingDrydentodiscoverhowfamiliarhewaswiththeKingJamesversion。

  WalterScottinsiststhatDrydenwasatheartserious,that\"hisindelicacywasliketheforcedimpudenceofabashfulman。\"Thatisgenerousjudgment。Butthereisthistobesaid:ashegrowsmoreserioushefallsmoreintoBiblewords。Ifhewritesapoliticalpamphlethecallsit\"AbsalomandAhithophel。\"

  InitheholdsthemenofthedayuptoscornunderBiblenames。TheyareZimriandShimei,andthelike。Whenheisfallingintobitterestsatire,hiswritingaboundsintheseBiblicalallusionswhichcouldbemadeonlybyonewhowasveryfamiliarwiththeBook。Quotationscannotbeabundant,ofcourse,butthereisagreatdealofthissortofthing:

  \"Sinking,helefthisdruggetrobebehind,Borneupwardbyasubterraneanwind,Themantlefelltotheyoungprophet\'spart,Withdoubleportionofhisfather\'sart。\"

  InhisEpistlesthereismuchofthesamesort。

  WhenhewritestoCongrevehespeaksofthefathers,andsays:

  \"Their\'swasthegiantracebeforetheflood。\"

  Fartheronhesays:

  \"Ourbuilderswerewithwantofgeniuscurst,Thesecondtemplewasnotlikethefirst。\"

  NowDrydenmayhavebeen,asMacaulaysaid,an\"illustriousrenegade,\"butallhiswritingshowstheinfluenceofthelanguageandtheideasoftheKingJamesversion。Wheneverwesingthe\"VeniCreator\"wesingJohnDryden。

  SowesingAddisonintheparaphraseofScripture,whichHaydn\'smusichasmadefamiliar:

  \"Thespaciousfirmamentonhigh,Withalltheblueetherealsky。\"

  WhileDrydenyieldedtohistimes,Addisondidnot,andtheSpectatorbecamenotonlyaliterarybutamoralpower。Intheefforttomakeitsohewasthrownbackonthelargestmoralinfluenceoftheday,theBible,andthroughouttheSpectatorandthroughallofAddison\'swritingyoufindonallproperoccasionstheBiblepressedtothefront。HereagainTaineputsitstrikingly:\"Itisnosmallthingtomakemoralityfashionable;Addisondidit,anditremainsfashionable。\"

  Ifwespeakofsinging,wemayrememberthatwesingthehymnofevenpoorlittledwarfedinvalidAlexanderPope。HewasborntheyearBunyandied,bornatcross-purposeswiththeworld。Hecouldwriteabittersatire,likethe\"Dunciad\";hecouldgivetheworldTheIliadandTheOdysseyinsuchEnglishthatweknowthemfarbetterthanintheGreekofHomer;

  butinthoseraremomentswhenhewasathisbetterselfhewouldwritehisgreaterpoem,\"TheMessiah\",inwhichthemovementofScriptureisoutlinedasitcouldbeonlybyonewhoknewtheEnglishBible。Andwhenwesing——

  \"Rise,crownedwithlight,imperialSalem,rise\"——

  itisworthwhiletorealizethatthevoicethatfirstsungitwasthatoftheirritablelittlepoetwhofoundsomeofhisscantcomfortinthegrandwordsandphrasesandideasofourEnglishBible。

  Withthesesix——Shakespeare,Milton,Bunyan,Dryden,Addison,andPope——thecourseoftheJacobeanliteratureissufficientlymeasured。

  Therearemanylessernames,butthesearetheoneswhichmadeitanepochinliterature,andtheseareattheirbestunderthepoweroftheBible。

  IntheGeorgiangroupweneedtocallonlyfivegreatnameswhichhavehadcreativeinfluenceinliterature。Ordinarycultureinliteraturewillincludesomeacquaintancewitheachofthem。IntheorderoftheirdeaththeyareShelley1829。,Byron1824,Coleridge1831,WalterScott1832,andWordsworth1850。

  Thelastlongoutlivedtheothers;buthebelongswiththem,becausehewasbornearlierthananyotherinthegroupanddidhischiefworkintheirtimeandbeforethelatergroupappeared。ExceptWordsworth,alltheseweregonebeforeQueenVictoriacametothethronein1837。Threeothernamescouldbecalled:

  Keats,RobertBurns,andCharlesLamb。Allwouldillustratewhatwearestudying。KeatsleastofallandBurnsmost。TheyareomittedherenotbecausetheydidnotfeeltheinfluenceoftheEnglishBible,notbecausetheydonotconstantlyshowitsinfluence,butbecausetheyarenotsocreativeastheothers;theyhavenotsoinfluencedthecurrentofliterature。Atanyrate,thefivenamedwillrepresentworthilyandwithsufficientcompletenesstheGeorgianperiodofEnglishliterature。

  NothingcouldrevealmoreclearlythanthislisthowwearedistinguishingtheBibleasliteraturefromtheBibleasanauthoritativebookinmorals。OnewouldmuchdisliketocredittheBiblewithanypartofthepersonallifeofShelleyorByron。Theywerefriends;they,weregeniuses;buttheywerebothbadlyafflictedwithcommonmoralleprosy。Itisplayingwithmoralstoexcuseeitherofthembecausehewasagenius。Nothinginthegeniusofeitherdemandedorwasservedbythecourseofcheapimmoralitywhichbothpractised。ItwasnotbecauseShelleywasageniusthathemarriedHarrietWestbrook,thenranawaywithMaryGodwin,thentriedtogetthetwotobecomefriendsandneighborsuntilhisownwifecommittedsuicide;itwasnothisgeniusthatmadehimyieldtotheinfluenceofEmiliaVivianiandwriteherthepoem\"Epipsychidion,\"tellingherandtheworldthathe\"wasneverattachedtothatgreatsectwhobelievedthateachoneshouldselectoutofthecrowdamistressorafriend\"andlettherestgo。Thatwasnotgenius,thatwasjustcommonpassion;andourdivorcecourtsarefullofShelleysofthattype。

  SoByron\'spersonalimmoralityisnottobeexplainednorexcusedonthegroundofhisgenius。ItwasnotgeniusthatledhimsoastrayinEnglandthathiswifehadtodivorcehim,andthatpublicopiniondrovehimoutoftheland。ItwasnothisgeniusthatsenthimtovisitShelleyandhismistressatLakeGenevaandseducetheirguest,sothatsheborehimadaughter,thoughshewasneverhiswife。ItwasnotgeniusthatmadehimpickupstillanothercompanionoutofseveralinItalyandlivewithherinimmoralrelation。InthenameofcommondecencyletnoonestandupforShelleyandByronintheirpersonalcharacters!Therearenottwomorallaws,oneforgeniusesandoneforcommonpeople。Byron,atanyrate,wasneverdeceivedabouthimself,neverblamedhisgeniusnorhisconscienceforhiswrong。Thesearestrikinglinesin\"ChildeHarold,\"inwhichhedisclaimsallrighttosympathy,because,\"ThethornswhichIhavereapedareofthetreeIplanted,——theyhavetornmeandIbleed。

  Ishouldhaveknownwhatfruitwouldspringfromsuchatree。\"

  Shelley\'swifewouldnotsaythatforhim。

  \"InallShelleydid,\"shesays,\"heatthetimeofdoingitbelievedhimselfjustifiedtohisownconscience。\"Well,somuchtheworseforShelley!Geniusesarenottheonlymenwhocanfindgoodreasonfordoingwhattheywanttodo。OneofShelley\'scriticssuggeststhatthetroublewashisintroductionintopersonalconductoftheimaginationwhichheoughttohavesavedforhiswriting。PerhapswemightexplainByron\'smisconductbyremindingourselvesofhisclub-foot,andapplyingonecodeofmoralstomenwithclub-feetandanothertomenwithnormalfeet。

  IfwespeakoftheinfluenceoftheBibleonthesemen,itmustbeontheirliterarywork;

  andwhenwefinditthere,itbecomespeculiarmarkofitspower。Theyhadlittlesenseofitasmorallaw。Theirconsciencesapproveditandcondemnedthemselves,orelsetheirdelicateliterarytastesenseditasabookofpower。

  ThisisnotablytrueofShelley。WhenhewasstillastudentinOxfordhecommittedhimselftotheopinionofanotherwriter,that\"themindcannotbelieveintheexistenceofGod。\"Hetriestoworkthatoutfullyinhisnoteson\"QueenMab。\"Whenhewashardlyyetofagehehimselfwrotethat\"ThegeniusofhumanhappinessmustteareveryleaffromtheaccursedBookofGod,eremancanreadtheinscriptiononitsheart。\"HeoncesaidthathishighestdesirewasthatthereshouldbeamonumenttohimselfsomewhereintheAlpswhichshouldbeonlyagreatstonewithitsfacesmoothedandthisshortinscriptioncutinit,\"PercyByssheShelley,Atheist。\"

  ItwouldseemthatwhateverShelleydrewofstrengthorinspirationfromtheBiblewouldbebywayofreaction;butitisnotso。Howeverhemayhavehatedthe\"accursedBookofGod,\"

  hiswifetellsinhernoteon\"TheRevoltofIslam\"

  thatShelley\"debatedwhetherheshoulddevotehimselftopoetryormetaphysics,\"and,resolvingontheformer,he\"educatedhimselfforit,engaginghimselfinthestudyofthepoetsofGreece,England,andItaly。Tothese,maybeadded,\"shegoeson,\"aconstantperusalofportionsoftheOldTestament,theBookofPsalms,Job,Isaiah,andothers,thesublimepoetryofwhichfilledhimwithdelight。\"Notonlydidhecatchthespiritofthatpoetry,butitsphraseshauntedhismemory。Inhisbestprosework,whichhecalledADefenseofPoetry,thereisaninterestingrevelationoftheinfluenceofhisBiblereadinguponhim。Towardtheendoftheessaythesetwosentencesoccur:\"Itisinconsistentwiththisdivisionofoursubjecttocitelivingpoets,butposterityhasdoneamplejusticetothegreatnamesnowreferredto。Theirerrorshavebeenweighedandfoundtohavebeendustinthebalance;iftheirsinsareasscarlet,theyarenowwhiteassnow;theyhavebeenwashedinthebloodofthemediatorandredeemer,Time。\"Thereisnomoreeloquentpassageintheessaythantheoneofwhichthisispart,andyetitisfullofallusiontothisBookfromwhichallpagesmustbetorn!Evenin\"QueenMab\"hemakesAhasuerus,thewanderingJew,recounttheBiblestoryinsuchbroadoutlinesascouldbegivenonlybyamanwhowasfamiliarwithit。WhenShelleywasinItalyandthewordcametohimofthemassacreatManchester,hewrotehis\"MasqueofAnarchy。\"

  Therearefewmoremelodiouslinesofhiswritingthanthosewhichoccurinthislongpoeminthesectionregardingfreedom。Fourofthoselinesareoftenquoted。TheyareattheveryheartofShelley\'sbestwork。Addressingfreedom,hesays:

  \"Thouartlove:therichhavekissedThyfeet,and,likehimfollowingChrist,Gavetheirsubstancetothefree,Andthroughtheroughworldfollowthee。\"

  PageafterpageofShelleyrevealsthesehalf-

  consciousreferencestotheBible。Thereweretwosourcesfromwhichhereceivedhispassionatedemocracy。OnewasthetreatmenthereceivedatEton,andlateratOxford;theotherishisfrequentreadingoftheEnglishBible,eventhoughhewasinthespiritofrebellionagainstmuchofitsteaching。InBrowning\'sessayonShelley,hereachestheamazingconclusionthat\"hadShelleylived,hewouldfinallyhaverangedhimselfwiththeChristians,\"andseekstojustifyitbyshowingthathewasmovingstraighttowardthepositionsofPaulandofDavid。Someofusmaynotseesuchrapidapproach,butthatShelleyfeltthedrawingofGodintheuniverseisplainenough。

  TheinfluenceoftheBibleisstillmoremarkedonByron。HespenthischildhoodyearsatAberdeen。TherehisnursetrainedhimintheBible;and,thoughhedidnotlivebyit,heneverlosthisloveforit,norhisknowledgeofit。Hetellsofhisownexperienceinthisway:

  \"Iamagreatreaderofthosebooks[theBible],andhadreadthemthroughandthroughbeforeIwaseightyearsold;thatistosay,theOldTestament,fortheNewstruckmeasatask,buttheotherasapleasure。\"[1]OneoftheearliestbitsofhisworkisaparaphraseofoneofthePsalms。Hisphysicalinfirmityputhimatoddswiththeworld,whilehisstrikingbeautydrewtohimacrowdofadmirerswhohelpedtopoisoneveryspringofhisgenius。Evenso,heheldhislovefortheBible。WhileShelleyoftenspokeofitincontempt,whilehepridedhimselfonhisdivergencefromthepathofitsteaching,Byronneverdid。Hewanderedfar,buthealwaysknewit;and,thoughhecouldhardlyfindtermstoexpresshiscontemptfortheChurch,thereisnolineofByron\'swritingwhichisaslurattheBible。Ontheotherhand,muchofhisworkrevealsapassionforthebeautyofitaswellasitstruth。HismostmelodiouswritingisinthatgroupofHebrewmelodieswhichwerewrittentobesung。TheydemandfarmorethanapassingknowledgeoftheBiblebothfortheirwritingandtheirunderstanding。Thereisalonglistofthem,butnoonewithoutaknowledgeoftheBiblewouldhaveknownwhathemeantbyhispoem,\"TheHarptheMonarchMinstrelSwept。\"\"Jephtha\'sDaughter\"presumesuponaknowledgeoftheOldTestamentstorywhichwouldnotcometooneinapassingstudyoftheBible。\"TheSongofSaulBeforehisLastBattle\"andthepoemheaded\"Saul\"

  couldnothavebeenwritten,norcantheybereadintelligentlybyanyonewhodoesnotknowhisBible。AmongByron\'sdramas,twoofwhichhethoughtmost,were,\"HeavenandEarth\"

  and\"Cain。\"WhenhewasaccusedofpervertingtheScripturein\"Cain,\"herepliedthathehadonlytakentheScriptureatitsfacevalue。

  BothofthedramasarenotonlybuiltdirectlyoutofScripturalevents,butimplyafarwiderknowledgeofScripturethantheirmeretitlessuggest。

  [1]Taine,EnglishLiterature,II。,279。

  Therearestrikingreferencesinmanyotherpoems,eveninhisalmostvilepoem,\"DonJuan。\"Themostnotableinstanceisinthefifteenthcanto,whereheisspeakingofpersecutedsagesandtheselinesoccur:

  \"Wasitnotso,greatLocke?andgreaterBacon?

  GreatSocrates?AndThouDivinerstill,Whoselotitisbymentobemistaken,AndThypurecreedmadesanctionofallill?

  Redeemingworldstobebybigotsshaken,HowwasThytoilrewarded?\"

  InanoteonthispassageByronsays:\"Asitisnecessaryinthesetimestoavoidambiguity,IsaythatImeanby\'Divinerstill\'Christ。IfeverGodwasman——ormanGod——Hewasboth。

  IneverarraignedHiscreed,buttheuseorabuseofit。Mr。CanningonedayquotedChristianitytosanctionslavery,andMr。Wilberforcehadlittletosayinreply。AndwasChristcrucifiedthatblackmenmightbescourged?Ifso,Hehadbetterbeenbornamulatto,togivebothcolorsanequalchanceoffreedom,oratleastsalvation。\"ByroncouldlivefarfromtheinfluenceoftheBibleinhispersonallife;butheneverescapeditsinfluenceinhisliterarywork。

  OfColeridgelessneedstobesaid,becausewethinkofhimsomuchintermsofhismoremeditativemusings,whichareoftenreligious。

  HehimselftellsoflongandcarefulrereadingsoftheEnglishBibleuntilhecouldsay:IntheBible\"thereismorethatfindsmethanIhaveexperiencedinallotherbookstogether;thewordsoftheBiblefindmeatgreaterdepthsofmybeing。\"Ofcourse,thatwouldinfluencehiswriting,anditdid。Eveninthe\"RimeoftheAncientMariner\"muchofthephraseologyisScriptural。Whenthealbatrossdrewnear,\"AsifithadbeenaChristiansoul,WehaileditinGod\'sname。\"

  WhenthemarinerslepthegavepraisetoMary,QueenofHeaven。Hesoughttheshrivingofthehermit-priest。Heendsthestorybecausehehears\"thelittlevesperbell\"whichbidshimtoprayer。Whenyoureadhis\"HymnBeforeSunriseintheValeofChamounix\"youfindyourselfreadingtheNineteenthPsalm。HecallsonthemotionlesstorrentsandthesilentcataractsandthegreatMontBlancitselftopraiseGod。ColeridgeneverhadseenChamounix,norMontBlanc,noraglacier,butheknewhisBible。SohehashisChristmasCarolalongwithalltherest。HispoemoftheMoorsaftertheCivilWarunderPhilipII。isScripturalinitsphraseology,andsoismuchelsethathewrote。

  Franklyandwillinglyheyieldedtoitsinfluence。

  Inhis\"TableTalk\"heoftenreferstothevalueoftheBibleintheformingofliterarystyle。Oncehesaid:\"IntensestudyoftheBiblewillkeepanywriterfrombeingvulgarinpointofstyle。\"[1]

  [1]June14,1830。

  TheverymentionofColeridgemakesonethinkofWordsworth。TheyhadaDamonandPythiasfriendship。TheWordsworthswerepoor;theyhadonlyseventypoundsayear,andtheywerenotashamed。Coleridgecalledthemthehappiestfamilyheeversaw。WordsworthwasnotnarrowlyaChristianpoet,hewasnotalwaysseekingtoputChristiandogmaintopoetry,butthroughouthewasexpressingtheChristianspiritwhichhehadlearnedfromtheBible。HispoetrywasonelongprotestagainstbanishingGodfromtheuniverse。Itwasliterallytrueofhimthat\"themeanestflowerthatgrowscangivethoughtsthattoooftenlietoodeepfortears。\"Ifthiswerethetimetobecritical,onewouldthinkthattoomuchwassometimesmadeofveryminuteoccurrences;butthistendencytogetbackoftheeventandseehowGodismovingislearnedbestfromScripture,whereWordsworthhimselflearnedit。Ifyoureadhis\"IntimationsofImmortality,\"orthe\"OdetoDuty,\"or\"TinternAbbay,\"oreventheratherlabored\"Excursion,\"youfindyourselfundertheScripturalinfluence。

  ThereremainsinthisGeorgiangroupthegreatprosemaster,WalterScott。Mr。GladstonesaidhethoughtScottthegreatestofhiscountrymen。JohnMorleysuggestedJohnKnoxinstead。Mr。Gladstonereplied:\"No,thelinemustbedrawnfirmlybetweenthewriterandthemanofaction——nocomparisonthere。\"[1]HewentontosaythatBurnsisveryfineandtrue,nodoubt,\"buttoimagineawholegroupofcharacters,tomarshalthem,tosetthemtowork,andtosustaintheaction,Imustcountthatthetestofhighestandmostdiversifiedquality。\"AllwhoarefondofScottwillrealizehowconstantlythesceneswhichheisdescribinggroupthemselvesaroundreligiousobservances,howoftenmenareheldincheckfromdeedsofviolencebyreligiousconception。ManyofthesescenescrystallizearoundaScripturalevent。

点击下载App,搜索"A STUDY OF THE BIBLE",免费读到尾