[1]Thefourthreadsinhisversion，\"Blessedaretheywhichhungerandthirstforrighteousness\"；theseventh，\"Blessedarethemaintainersofpeace\"；theeighth，\"Blessedaretheywhichsufferpersecutionforrighteousness\'sake。\"
[2]HistoryofEngland，endofchap。xii。
WesaidamomentagothatWiclif\'stranslationwasthestandardofMiddleEnglish。ItistimetoaddthatTindale\'sversion\"fixedourstandardEnglishonceforall，andbroughtitfinallyintoeveryEnglishhome。\"Therevisersof1881declaredthatwhiletheauthorizedversionwastheworkofmanyhands，thefoundationofitwaslaidbyTindale，andthattheversionsthatfolloweditweresubstantiallyreproductionsofTindale\'s，orrevisionsofversionswhichwerethemselvesalmostentirelybasedonit。
Therewaseveryreasonwhyitshouldbeaworthyversion。Foronething，itwasthefirsttranslationintoEnglishfromtheoriginalHebrewandGreek。Wiclif\'shadbeenfromtheLatin。ForTindaletherewereavailabletwonewandcriticalGreekTestaments，thatofErasmusandtheso-calledComplutensian，thoughheusedthatofErasmuschiefly。TherewasalsoavailableacarefullypreparedHebrewOldTestament。Foranotherthing，itwasthefirstversionwhichcouldbeprinted，andsobesubjecttoeasyandimmediatecorrectionandrevision。Thenalso，Tindalehimselfwasagreatscholarinthelanguages。Hewas\"soskilledinthesevenlanguages，Hebrew，Greek，Latin，Italian，Spanish，English，andFrench，that，whicheverhespoke，youwouldsupposeitwashisnativetongue。\"[1]Norwashisspiritintheworkcontroversial。Isayhis\"spiritinthework\"withcare。Theywerecontroversialtimes，andTindaletookhisshareintheverbalwarfare。When，forexample，therewasobjectiontomakinganyEnglishversionbecause\"thelanguagewassorudethattheBiblecouldnotbeintelligentlytranslatedintoit，\"Tindalereplied:\"Itisnotsorudeastheyarefalseliars。FortheGreektongueagreethmorewiththeEnglishthanwiththeLatin，athousandpartsbettermayitbetranslatedintotheEnglishthanintotheLatin。\"[2]AndwhenahighchurchdignitaryprotestedtoTindaleagainstmakingtheBiblesocommon，hereplied:\"IfGodsparemylife，eremanyyearsIwillcauseaboythatdrivethaplowshallknowmoreoftheScripturesthanthoudost。\"Andwhilethatwasnotsayingmuchfortheplowboy，itwassayingagooddealtothedignitary。Inlanguage，Tindalewascontroversialenough，butinhisspirit，inmakinghisversion，therewasnoelementofcontroversy。Forsuchreasonsasthesewemightexpecttheversiontobevaluable。
[1]HermanBuschius。
[2]ThiswillmeanthemoretouswhenwerealizethattheliterarymenofthedaydespisedtheEnglishtongue。SirThomasMorewrotehisUtopiainLatin，becauseotherwiseeducatedmenwouldnotdeigntoreadit。YearslaterRogerAschamapologizedforwritingoneofhisworksinEnglish。PuttingtheBibleintocurrentEnglishimpressedtheseliterarymenverymuchaswewouldbeimpressedbyputtingtheBibleintocurrentslang。
Allthiswhile，andespeciallybetweenthetimewhenTindalefirstpublishedhisNewTestamentandthetimetheyburnedhimfordoingso，aninterestingchangewasgoingoninEngland。
TheKingwasHenryVIII。，whowasbynomeansawillingProtestant。AsLuther\'sworkappeared，itwasthissameHenrywhowrotethepamphletagainsthimduringtheDietofWorms，andonthegroundofthispamphlet，withitsloyalsupportoftheChurchagainstLuther，hereceivedfromtheRomanpontiffthetitle\"DefenderoftheFaith，\"whichthekingsofEnglandstillwear。Andyetunderthiskingthisstrangesuccessionofdatescanbegiven。Noticethemclosely。In1526Tindale\'sNewTestamentwasburnedatSt。Paul\'sbytheBishopofLondon；tenyearslater，1536，TindalehimselfwasburnedwiththeknowledgeandconnivanceoftheEnglishgovernment；andyet，oneyearlater，1537，twoversionsoftheBibleinEnglish，three-quartersofwhichweretheworkofTindale，werelicensedforpublicusebytheKingofEngland，andwererequiredtobemadeavailableforthepeople!ElevenyearsaftertheNewTestamentwasburned，oneyearafterTindalewasburned，thatcrownwassetonhiswork!Whatbroughtthisabout?
Threefactshelptoexplainit。First，therecentyearsofBibletranslationwerehavingtheirweight。ThefugitivecopiesoftheBibleweredoingtheirwork。SpiteofthesharpoppositionfiftythousandcopiesofTindale\'svariouseditionshadactuallybeenpublishedandcirculated。Menwerereadingthem；theywereapprovingthem。Themoretheyread，thelessreasontheysawforhidingtheBookfromthepeople。Whyshoulditnotbemadecommonandfree?TherewasstrongLutheranopinionintheuniversities。ItwasalreadyacustomforEnglishteacherstogotoGermanyforminutescholarship。TheycamebackwithGermanBiblesinLuther\'sversionandwithGreekTestaments，andtheyoungscholarswhowerebeingraisedupfelttheinfluence，consciouslyorunconsciously，ofthefreeuseoftheBiblewhichruledinmanyGermanuniversities。
ThesecondfactthathelpstoexplainthesuddenchangeofattitudetowardtheBibleisthis:
thepeopleofEnglandwereneverwillinglyruledfromwithout，religiouslyorpolitically。
TherehasrecentlybeenaconsiderablecontroversyoverthehistoryoftheEstablishedChurchofEngland，whetherithasalwaysbeenanindependentchurchorwasatonetimeofficiallyapartoftheRomanChurch。Thatisamatterforecclesiasticalhistorytodetermine。
Thefoundationfact，however，isasI
wordeditamomentago:thepeopleofEnglandwereneverwillinglyruledfromwithout，religiouslyorpolitically。Theyweresometimesruledfromwithout；buttheywereeitherindifferenttoitatthetimeorrebelliousagainstit。Thosewhodidthinkclaimedtherighttothinkforthemselves。TheScotchofthenorthwerepeculiarlyso，buttheEnglishofthesouthclaimedthesameright。TherehasalwaysbeenanimmensecontrastbetweenthetwosidesoftheBritishChannel。TheFrenchpeopleduringallthoseyearsweredeeplyloyaltoaforeignreligiousgovernment。TheEnglishpeoplewereneverso，notinthedaysofthefullestRomansupremacy。Theyalwaysdemandedatleastaformofhomegovernment。ThatmadeEnglandacongenialhomefortheProtestantspirit，whichclaimedtherighttoindependentstudyofthesourcesofreligionandindependentjudgmentregardingthem。ItwasonlyacontinuanceofthespiritofWiclifandtheLollards。
Thespiritinanationliveslong，especiallywhenitispasseddownbytradition。Thosewerenotthedaysofnewspapers。Theywereinsteadthedaysofgreatmeetings，moreimportantstillofsmallfamilygatherings，wherethememoryoftheoldermenwascalledintouse，andwhereboysandgirlsdrankineagerlythetraditionsoftheirowncountryasexpressedinthegreateventsoftheirhistory。Newspapersnevercanfullytaketheplaceofthosegatherings，fortheydonotbringmentogethertofeelthethrillofthestorythatistold。ItmustberememberedthattheentirepopulationofEnglandatthattimewasonlyaboutthreemillions。Andthatoldspiritofindependencewasstronglyatworkinthemiddle-classvillagesandamongthemerchants，andtheywerearulinganddominantclass。Thatwassecond，thatinthosetenyearsthereasserteditselftheage-longunwillingnessoftheEnglishpeopletoberuledfromwithout。
ThethirdfactwhichmustbetakenintoaccounttoexplainthisremarkablechangeoffrontofthepublicEnglishlifeisHenryVIII。
himself。Thereismuchabouthimthatnocountrywouldwillinglyclaim。HewasthemosthabitualbridegroominEnglishhistory；
hehadanalmostconfirmedhabitofbeheadinghiswivesorotherwiseriddinghimselfofthem。
YetmanytraitsmadehimatypicaloutstandingEnglishman。Hehadthecharacteristicspiritofindependence，theresentmentofforeigncontrol，satisfactionwithhisownland，thefeelingthatofcourseitisthebestland。TherearenopeopleintheworldsowellsatisfiedwiththeirowncountryasthepeopleofEnglandortheBritishIsles。Theyarecriticalofmanythingsintheirowngovernmentuntiltheybegintocompareitwithothercountries；theymustmaketheirchangesontheirownlines。ThepamphletofHenryVIII。，whichwonhimthetitleofDefenderoftheFaith，praisedthepope；
and，thoughSirThomasMoreurgedhimtochangehisexpressionslestheshouldlivetoregretthem，hewouldnotchangethem。ButthatwaswhilethepopewasservinghiswishesandwhathefeltwasEngland\'sgood。
Therearosepresentlythequestion，ortheseveralquestions，abouthismarriage。ItshedsnogloryonHenryVIII。thattheyaroseastheydid；buthistreatmentofthemmustnotbemistaken。HewasconcernedtohavehismarriagetoAnneBoleynconfirmed，andtherearesomewhothinkhewashonestinbelievingitoughttobeconfirmed，thoughweneednotbelievethat。WhathappenedwasthatforthefirsttimeHenryVIII。foundthatassovereignofEnglandhemusttakecommandsfromaforeignpower，apowerexercisingtemporalsovereigntyexactlyashedid，butaddingtoitaclaimtospiritualpower，aclaimtodeterminehisconductforhimandtoabsolvehispeoplefromloyaltytohimifhewasnotobedient。Itaroseoverthequestionofhisdivorce，butitmighthavearisenoveranythingelse。ItwaslimitationonhissovereigntyinEngland。AndheletitbeseenthatallquestionsthatpertaintoEnglandweretobesettledinEngland，andnotinanotherland。HewouldratherhaveamattersettledwronginEnglandthansettledrightelsewhere。ThatishowheclaimedtobeheadoftheEnglishChurch。Thepeoplebackofhimhadalwaysheldtothebeliefthattheyweregovernedfromwithin，thoughtheywerelinkedtoreligionfromwithout。Heexecutedtheirtheory。ThatassertionofEnglishsovereigntycameduringtheeventfulyearsofwhichwearespeaking。
Here，then，areourgreatfacts。First，thoughtfulopinionwantedtheBiblemadeavailable，andataconventionofbishopsanduniversitymentheKingwasrequestedtosecuretheissuanceofapropertranslation。Secondly，thepeoplewantedit，themorebecauseitwouldgratifytheirEnglishinstinctofindependentjudgmentinmattersofreligion。Thirdly，theKinggranteditwithoutyieldinghispersonalreligiousposition，inassertionofhishumansovereigntywithinhisownrealm。
SoEnglandawokeonemorningin1537todiscoverthatithadatranslationoftheBibletwoofthemactually，opentoitsuse，theverythingthathadbeenforbiddenyesterday!Andthat，oneyearafterTindalehadbeenburnedinloyalFranceforissuinganEnglishtranslation!
Twoversionswerenowauthorizedandmadeavailable。Whatwerethey?ThatofMilesCoverdale，whichhadbeenissuedsecretlytwoyearsbefore，andthatknownasthe\"Matthew\"
Bible，thoughthenamehasnosignificance，issuedwithinayear。Detailsarenottoourpurpose。Neitherwasanindependentwork，butwasmadelargelyfromtheLatinandtheGerman，andmuchinfluencedbyTindale。
CoverdalewasaYorkshiremanlikeWiclif，feminineinhismentalcastasTindalewasmasculine。
Coverdalemadehistranslationbecausehelovedbooks；Tindalebecausehefeltdriventoit。Butnowthewaywasclear，andothereditionsappeared。Itisnaturaltonameoneortwoofthemorenotableones。
ThereappearedwhatisknownastheGreatBiblein1539。ItwasonlyanotherversionmadebyCoverdaleonthebasisoftheMatthewversion，butcorrectedbymoreaccurateknowledge。
Thereisaninterestingromanceofitspublication。ThepressesofEnglandwerenotadequateforthegreatworkplanned；itwastobeamarveloftypography。SotheconsentofKingFranciswasgainedtohaveitprintedinFrance，andCoverdalewassentasaspecialambassadortooverseeit。HewasindreadoftheInquisition，whichwasinvogueatthetime，andsentoffhisprintedsheetstoEnglandasrapidlyaspossible。SuddenlyonedaytheorderofconfiscationcamefromtheInquisitor-General。
OnlyCoverdale\'sofficialpositionasrepresentingtheKingsavedhisownlife。Asfortheprintedsheetsonwhichsomuchdepended，theyseemeddoomed。Butinthenickoftimeadealerappearedattheprinting-houseandpurchasedfourgreatvatsfullofwastepaperwhichheshippedtoEngland——whenitwasfoundthatthewastepaperwasthoseprintedsheets。ThepressesandtheprinterswereallloyaltoEngland，andtheeditionwasfinallycompleted。TheGreatBiblewasissuedtomeetadecreethateachchurchshouldmakeavailableinsomeconvenientplacethelargestpossiblecopyofthewholeBible，wherealltheparishionerscouldhaveaccesstoitandreaditattheirwill。Theversiongetsitsnamesolelyfromthesizeofthevolume。Thatdecreedates1538，twelveyearsafterTindale\'sbookswereburned，andtwoyearsafterhewasburned!Theinstallationofthesegreatbookscausedtremendousexcitement——crowdsgatheredeverywhere。BishopBonnercausedsixcopiesofthegreatvolumetobelocatedwiselythroughoutSt。Paul\'s。Hefounditdifficulttomakepeopleleavethemduringthesermons。Hewassoofteninterruptedbyvoicesreadingtoagroup，andbythediscussionsthatensued，thathethreatenedtohavethemtakenoutduringtheserviceifpeoplewouldnotbequiet。TheGreatBibleappearedinseveneditionsintwoyears，andcontinuedinrecognizedpowerforthirtyyears。
MuchofthepresentEnglishprayer-bookistakenfromit。
Butthislibertywassosuddenthatthepeoplenaturallyabusedit。Henrybecamevexedbecausethesacredwords\"weredisputed，rimed，sung，andjangledineveryale-house。\"Therehadgrownupaseriesofwildballadsandribaldsongsincontemptof\"theoldfaith，\"
whileitwasnotreallytheoldfaithwhichwasindispute，butonlyforeigncontrolofEnglishfaith。TheyhadmistakenHenry\'smeaning。
SoHenrybegantoputrestrictionsontheuseoftheBible。Thereweretobenonotesorannotationsinanyversions，andthosethatexistedweretobeblackedout。OnlytheupperclassesweretobeallowedtopossessaBible。
Finally，theyearbeforehisdeath，allversionswereprohibitedexcepttheGreatBible，whosecostandsizeprecludedsecretuse。ThedecreeledtoanothergreatburningofBiblesin1546——
Tindale，Coverdale，Matthew——allbuttheGreatBible。TheleadingreligiousreformerstookflightandfledtoEuropeanProtestanttownslikeFrankfortandStrassburg。ButtheBibleremained。HenryVIII。died。TheBiblelivedon。
UnderEdwardVI。，theboyking，comingtothethroneatnineanddyingatfifteen，theregencywithCrammeratitsheadearneditsbadname。ButwhileitsmemberswereshamelesslydespoilingchurchesandenrichingthemselvestheydidonegreatservicefortheBible。
Theycastoffallrestrictionsonitstranslationandpublication。TheorderforaGreatBibleineverychurchwasrenewed，andtherewastobeaddedtoitacopyofErasmus\'sparaphraseofthefourgospels。NearlyfiftyeditionsoftheBible，inwholeorinpart，appearedinthosesixyears。
Andthatwasfortunate，forthencameMary——andthedeluge。Ofcourse，sheagaingaveinthenominalallegianceofEnglandtotheRomancontrol。Butsheutterlymissedthespiritofthepeople。TheywerewearywiththeexcessesofrabidProtestantism；buttheywerebynomeansreadytoadmittheprincipleofforeigncontrolinreligiousmatters。Theymighthavebeenwilling，manyofthem，thattheuseoftheBibleshouldberestricted，ifitweredonebytheirownsovereign。Theywerenotwillingthatanothersovereignshouldrestrictthem。
SothesecretuseoftheBibleincreased。Martyrfireswerekindled，butbythelightofthemthepeoplereadtheirBiblesmoreeagerly。AndthisverypersecutionledtooneofthebestoftheearlyversionsoftheBible，indirectlyeventotheKingJamesversion。
TheflowerofEnglishProtestantscholarshipwasdrivenintoexile，andfounditswaytoFrankfortandGenevaagain。Therethespiritofscholarshipwasuntrammeled；theretheyfoundmaterialforscholarlystudyoftheBible，andtheretheymadeandpublishedanewversionoftheBibleinEnglish，byallmeansthebestthathadbeenmade。Inlateryears，underElizabeth，itdrovetheGreatBibleoffthefieldbysheerpowerofexcellence。Duringherreignsixtyeditionsofitappeared。ThiswastheversioncalledtheGenevanBible。Itmadeseveralchangesthatarefamiliartous。Foronething，intheGenevaneditionof1560firstappearedourfamiliardivisionintoverses。Thechapterdivisionwasmadethreecenturiesearlier；buttheversesbelongtotheGenevanversion，andaredividedtomaketheBooksuitableforresponsiveuseandforreadierreference。ItwastakeninlargepartfromtheworkofRobertStephens，whohaddividedtheGreekTestamentintoverses，tenyearsearlier，duringajourneywhichhewascompelledtomakebetweenParisandLyons。TheGenevanversionalsoabandonedtheoldblackletter，andusedtheRomantypewithwhichwearefamiliar。Ithadfullnotesonhardpassages，whichnotes，asweshallsee，helpedtoproducetheKingJamesversion。
TheworkitselfwascompletedaftertheaccessionofElizabeth，whenmostofthereligiousleadershadreturnedtoEnglandfromtheirexileunderMary。
ElizabethherselfwasnotanardentProtestant，notardentatallreligiously，butanardentEnglishwoman。Sheunderstoodherpeople，andwhileshepridedherselfonbeingthe\"GuardianoftheMiddleWay，\"shedidnotmakethemistakeofsubmittinghersovereigntytoforeignsupervision。ProbablyElizabethalwayscountedherselfpersonallyaCatholic，butnotpoliticallysubjecttotheRomanpontiff。ShehadnowishtooffendotherCatholicpowers；
butshewasdeterminedtodevelopastrongnationalspiritandtoallowreligiousdifferencestoexistiftheywouldbepeaceful。Thedramaticscenewhichwasenactedatthetimeofhercoronationprocessionwastypicalofherspirit。AstheprocessionpasseddownCheapside，avenerableoldman，representingTime，withalittlechildbesidehimrepresentingTruth——Timealwaysold，Truthalwaysyoung——
presentedtheQueenwithacopyoftheScriptures，whichsheaccepted，promisingtoreadthemdiligently。
PresentlyitwasfoundthattwoversionsoftheBibleweretakingthefield，theoldGreatBibleandthenewGenevanBible。OnallaccountstheGenevanwasthebetterandwasdrivingoutitsrival。YettherecouldbenohopeofgainingtheapprovalofElizabethfortheGenevanBible。Foronething，JohnKnoxhadbeenapartytoitspreparation；sohadCalvin。Elizabethdetestedthemboth，especiallyKnox。Foranotherthing，itsnoteswerenotfavorabletoroyalsovereignty，butsmackedsomuchofpopulargovernmentastobeoffensive。Foranotherthing，thoughithadbeenmademostlybyherownpeople，ithadbeenmadeinaforeignland，andwasundersuspiciononthataccount。TheresultwasthatElizabeth\'sarchbishop，Parker，setouttohaveanauthorizedversionmade，selectedarevisioncommittee，withinstructionstofollowwhereverpossibletheGreatBible，toavoidbitternotes，andtomakesuchaversionthatitmightbefreely，easily，andnaturallyread。TheresultisknownastheBishops\'Bible。ItwasissuedinElizabeth\'stenthyear1568，butthereisnorecordthatsheevernoticedit，thoughParkersentheracopyfromhissick-bed。TheBishops\'
BibleshowstheinfluenceoftheGenevanBibleinmanyways，thoughitgivesnocreditforthat。Itisnotofequalmerit；itwasexpensive，toocumbersome，andoftenunscholarly。
Onlyitsofficialstandinggaveitlife，andafterfortyyears，innineteeneditions，itwasnolongerpublished。
NamingoneotherEnglishversionwillcompletetheseriesoffactsnecessaryfortheconsiderationoftheformingoftheKingJamesversion。ItwillberememberedthatalltheEnglishversionsoftheBiblethusfarmentionedweretheworkofmeneitheralreadyoutoffavorwiththeRomanpontiff，orspeedilyputoutoffavoronthataccount。Thirtyyearsafterhisdeath；Wiclif\'sbonesweretakenupandburned；
Tindalewasburned。Coverdale\'sversionandtheGreatBibleweretheproductoftheperiodwhenHenryVIII。wasundertheban。TheGenevanBiblewastheworkofrefugees，andtheBishops\'BiblewaspreparedwhenElizabethhadbeenexcommunicated。ThatfactseemedtomanyloyalRomanchurchmentoputtheChurchinafalselight。ItmustbemadeclearthatitsoppositionwasnottotheBible，noteventopopularuseandpossessionoftheBible，butonlytounauthorized，evenincorrect，versions。SotherecameabouttheDouaiversion，instigatedbyGregoryMartin，andpreparedinsomesenseasananswertotheGenevanversionanditsstronglyanti-papalnotes。ItwastheworkofEnglishscholarsconnectedwiththeUniversityofDouai。TheNewTestamentwasissuedatRheimsin1582，andthewholeBiblein1609，justbeforeourKingJamesversion。Itismade，notfromtheHebrewandtheGreek，thoughitreferstoboth，butfromtheVulgate。TheresultisthattheOldTestamentoftheDouaiversionisatranslationintoEnglishfromtheLatin，whichinlargepartisatranslationintoLatinfromtheGreekSeptuagint，whichinturnisatranslationintoGreekfromtheHebrew。Yetscholarsarescholars，anditshowsmarkedinfluenceoftheGenevanversion，and，indeed，ofotherEnglishversions。Itsnoteswerestronglyanti-Protestant，andinitsprefaceitexplainsitsexistencebysayingthatProtestantshavebeenguiltyof\"castingtheholytodogsandpearlstohogs。\"
Theversionisnotinthedirectlineoftheascentofthefamiliarversion，andneedsnoelaboratedescription。Itspurposewascontroversial；
itdidnotgotoavailablesources；
itsEnglishwasnotcolloquial，butecclesiastical。
Forexample，intheLord\'sPrayerweread:
\"Giveusthisdayoursupersubstantialbread，\"
insteadof\"ourdailybread。\"InHebrewsxiii:
17，theversionreads，\"Obeyyourprelatesandbesubjectuntothem。\"InLukeiii:3，Johncame\"preachingthebaptismofpenance。\"InPsalmxxiii:5，whereweread，\"Mycuprunnethover，\"theDouaiversionreads，\"Mychalicewhichinebriatethme，howgoodlyitis。\"
Thereisacarefulretentionofecclesiasticalterms，andanexplanationofthepassagesonwhichProtestantshadcometodifferrathersharplyfromtheirRomanbrethren，asinthematterofthetakingofthecupbythepeople，andelsewhere。
Yetitisonlyfairtorememberthatthismuchanswerwasmadetotheversionswhichwerepreparingthewayforthegreatestversionofthemall，andwhenthetimecameforthemakingofthatversion，andthehelpsweregatheredtogether，theDouaiwasfranklyplacedamongthem。ItisapeculiarironyoffatethatwhilethepurposeofGregoryMartinwastocheckthetranslationoftheBiblebytheProtestants，theonlyeffectofhisworkwastoadvanceandimprovethattranslation。
Atlast，asweshallseeinournextstudy，thewaywasclearedforafreeandopensettingoftheBibleintoEnglish。Thewayhadbeenbesetwithstruggle，markedwithblood，lightedbymartyrfires。WiclifandPurvey，TindaleandCoverdale，therefugeesatGenevaandtheBishopsatLondon，allhadtrodthatway。
Kingshadfoughtthemorhadfavoredthem；
itwasallone；theyhadgoneon。LoyalzestfortheirBookandlovingzealforthecommonpeoplehadheldthemtothepath。Nowithadbecomeahighwayopentoallmen。Andrightworthywerethefeetwhichweresoontreadingit。
LECTUREII
THEMAKINGOFTHEKINGJAMESVERSION；ITS
CHARACTERISTICS
EARLYinJanuary，1604，menweremakingtheirwayalongthepoorEnglishhighways，bycoachandcarrier，totheHamptonCourtPalaceofthenewEnglishking。Theywerecomingfromthecathedraltowns，fromtheuniversities，fromthelargercities。ManywereChurchdignitaries，manywerescholars，somewerePuritans，allwereloyalEnglishmen，andtheyweregatheringinresponsetoacallforaconferencewiththeking，JamesI。Theyweredividedinsentiment，thesemen，andthosewhohopedmostfromtheconferenceweredoomedtocompletedisappointment。Notoneamongthem，nottheKing，hadtheslightestpurposethattheconferenceshoulddowhatprovedtobeitsonlyrealservice。Someofthemen，graveandearnest，werecomingtopresenttheirpetitionstotheKing，otherswerecomingtoopposetheirpetitions；theKingmeanttodenythemandtoharrythepetitioners。Andeverythingcameoutasithadbeenplanned。Yetthelargestserviceoftheconference，theonlyrealservice，wasinnoone\'smind，foritwasatHamptonCourt，onthelastdayoftheconferencebetweenJamesandthechurchmen，January18，1604，thatthefirstformalstepwastakentowardthemakingoftheso-calledAuthorizedVersionoftheEnglishBible。Iftherearesuchthingsasaccidents，thisgreatenterprisebeganinanaccident。Buttheoutcomeoftheaccident，thevolumethatresulted，is\"allowedbyallcompetentauthoritiestobethefirst，[thatis，thechief]Englishclassic，\"ifourProfessorCook，ofYale，mayspeak；\"isuniversallyacceptedasaliterarymasterpiece，asthenoblestandmostbeautifulBookintheworld，whichhasexercisedanincalculableinfluenceuponreligion，uponmanners，uponliterature，anduponcharacter，\"iftheBalliolCollegescholarHoarecanbetrusted；andhas\"madetheEnglishlanguage，\"ifProfessorMarchisright。Thepurposeofthisstudyistoshowhowthataccidentoccurred，andwhatimmediatelycamefromit。
WiththedeathofElizabeththeTudorlineofsovereignsdiedout。ThecollateralStuartline，descendingdirectlyfromHenryVII。，naturallysucceededtothethrone，andJamesVI。ofScotlandmadehisroyalprogresstotheEnglishcapitalandbecameJamesI。ofEngland。
InhimappearsthefirstofthatStuartlineduringwhosereigngreatchangesweretooccur。Everyoneinthelineheldstronglytothedogmaofthedivinerightofkings，yetunderthatlinetheEnglishpeopletransferredsovereigntyfromthekingtoParliament。[1]Fortunatelyforhistory，andfortheprogressofpopulargovernment，theStuartlinehadnoforcefulfiguresinit。MacaulaythinksitwouldhavebeenfataltoEnglishlibertyiftheyhadbeenablekings。Itwaseasiertotakesodangerousaweaponasthedivinerightofkingsfromweakhandsthanfromstrongones。SoitwasthatthoughJamescameoutofScotlandtoasserthisdivineandarbitraryrightassovereign，bythetimeQueenAnnedied，closingtheStuartlineandgivingwaytotheHanoverian，therealsovereigntyhadpassedintothehandsofParliament。
[1]Trevelyan，EnglandUndertheStuarts。
Buttheroyaltraveler，comingfromEdinburghtoLondon，isinterestingonhisownaccount——interestingatthisdistance。Heisthirty-sevenyearsold，andoughttobeinthebeginningofhisprime。Heisalittleovermiddleheight；lovesagoodhorse，thoughheisanungainlyrider，andhasfallenoffhishorsethreeorfourtimesduringhisroyalprogress；
isaheavydrinkeroftheliquorsoftheperiod，withhorriblycoarse，evengrossmanners。Macaulayisveryseverewithhim。Hesaysthat\"hiscowardice，hischildishness，hispedantry，hisungainlypersonandmanners，hisprovincialaccent，madehimanobjectofderision。Eveninhisvirtuesandaccomplishmentstherewassomethingeminentlyunkingly。\"[1]Itseemedtoobadthat\"royaltyshouldbeexhibitedtotheworldstammering，slobbering，sheddingunmanlytears，tremblingatthedrawnsword，andtalkinginthestylealternatelyofabuffoonandofapedagogue。\"Thatistrulynotanattractivepicture。Butthereissomethingontheotherside。JohnRichardGreenputsbothsides:\"Hisbighead，hisslobberingtongue，hisquiltedclothes，hisricketylegsstoodoutinasgrotesqueacontrastwithallthatmenrecalledofHenryandElizabethashisgabbleandrhodomontade，hiswantofpersonaldignity，hisbuffoonery，hiscoarsenessofspeech，hispedantry，hiscontemptiblecowardice。Underthisridiculousexterior，however，layamanofmuchnaturalability，aripescholarwithaconsiderablefundofshrewdness，ofmotherwitandreadyrepartee。\"[2]
[1]HistoryofEngland，chap。i。
[2]ShortHistoryoftheEnglishPeople，chap。viii，sec。ii。
Somegoodtraitshemusthavehad。Hedidwinsomementohim。Assomeonehassaid，\"Youcouldlovehim；youcoulddespisehim；
youcouldnothatehim。\"Hecouldsaysomewittyandstrikingthings。Forexample，whenhewasurgingtheformalunionofScotlandandEngland，anditwasopposed，hesaid:\"ButI
amthehusband，andthewholeislandismywife。IhopenoonewillbesounreasonableastosupposethatI，thatamaChristiankingundertheGospel，shouldbeapolygamistandhusbandtotwowives。\"[2]Aftertheconferenceofwhichwehavebeenspeaking，hewrotetoafriendinScotland:\"IhavehadarevelwiththePuritansandhavepepperedthemsoundly。\"
Asindeedhehad。Then，insomesenseatleast，\"Jameswasaborntheologian。\"HehadstudiedtheBibleinsomeformfromchildhood；oneofthefirstthingswehearofhisdoingisthewritingofaparaphraseonthebookoftheRevelation。
InhistalkhemadeeasyandfreeuseofScripturequotations。Tobesure，hisknowledge，onwhichhepridedhimselfunconscionably，wasshallowandpedantic。HenryIV。ofFrance，oneofhiscontemporaries，saidthathewas\"thewisestfoolinChristendom。\"
[2]Trevelyan，EnglandUndertheStuarts，p。107。
Now，itwasthismanwhowasmakinghisroyalprogressfromEdinburghtoLondoninMarch，1603，nearlyayearbeforethegatheringofmenwhichwewereobservingattheopeningofthisstudy。Manythingshappenedonthejourneybesideshisfallingoffhishorseseveraltimes；butoneofthemostsignificantwasthehaltingoftheprogresstoreceivewhatwascalledtheMiliaryPetition，whosenameimpliesthatitwassignedbyathousandmen——actuallysomewhatlessthanthatnumber——mostlyministersoftheChurch。ThePetitionmadenomentionofanyBibleversion，yetitwasthebeginningoftheeventswhichledtoit。BackofitwasthePuritaninfluence。ItaskedforreformsintheEnglishChurch，forthecorrectionofabuseswhichhadgrownunderElizabeth\'sincreasingfavorofritualandceremony。
Itaskedforabetter-trainedministry，forbetterdisciplineintheChurch，fortheomissionofsomanydetailedrequirementsofritesandceremonies，andforthatperenniallydesiredreform，shorterchurchservices!
VerynaturallythenewKingrepliedthathewouldtakeituplater，andpromisedtocallaconferencetoconsiderit。Andthishedid。
TheconferencemetatHamptonCourtinJanuary，1604，anditwasforthisthatthemenwerecomingfrommanypartsofEngland。Thegatheringwasheldonthe14th，16th，and18thofthemonth。ItssolepurposewastoconsiderthatMiliaryPetition；buttheKingcalledtoitnotonlythosewhohadsignedthePetition，butthosewhohadopposedit。Hehadnonotionofgrantinganyfavortoit，andfromthefirsthegavethePuritansroughtreatment。Hetoldthemhewouldhavenoneoftheirnon-
conformity，hewould\"makethemconformorharrythemoutoftheland。\"SomeonesuggestedthatsincethiswasaChurchmattertherebecalledaSynod，orsomegeneralgatheringfittedtodiscussanddeterminesuchthings，ratherthanleaveittoafewChurchdignitaries。Forthepurposesofthepetitionersitwasamostunfortunateexpression。JameshadjustcomefromScotland，wherethePresbyterianswerewiththeirSynod，andwhereCalvinismwasinfullswing。HewasmuchinfavorofsomeelementsofCalvinism；buthecouldnotseehowalltheelementsheldtogether。Predestination，forexample，whichoffendssomanypeopleto-day，wasapreciousdoctrinetoKingJames，andheinsistedthathissubjectsoughttoseehowclearlyGodhadpredestinedhimtoruleoverthem!
ButhecouldnottoleratethenecessarylogicalinferenceofCalvinismthatallmenmustbeequalbeforeGod，andsomencanmakeandunmakekingsastheyneedtodoso，thematterofkingorsubjectbeingpurelyanincidentalone。HerememberedthetimewhenAndrewMelville，oneoftheScotchministers，hadpluckedhimbyhisroyalsleeveandcalledhim\"God\'ssillyvassal\"righttohisface。So，whensomeonesaid\"Synod\"itbroughttheKingupstanding。Heburstout:\"Ifthatiswhatyoumean，ifyouwantwhattheScotchmeanbytheirSynodandtheirPresbytery，thenItellyouatoncethatIwillhavenoneofit。
PresbyteryagreeswithmonarchyverymuchasGodagreeswiththedevil。Ifyouhavenobishop，youwillsoonhavenoking。\"Hewasperfectlyright，withreferencetothekindofkinghemeant。Thesethingsweretobesettled，hemeant，byauthority，andnotbyconference。
ThatisthepointtowhichGardinerreferswhenhesaysthat\"intwominutesJamessealedhisownfateandthatofEnglandforever。\"[1]
[1]HistoryofEngland，1603-42。
Afterthattherewasonlyalosingfightforthepetitioners。TheyhadtouchedasorespotinJames\'shistory。ButitwaswhentheytouchedthatsorespotagainthattheystartedthemovementforanewversionoftheBible。
Itwasontheseconddayoftheconference，January16th，thatDr。Reynolds，presidentofCorpusChristiCollege，Oxford，whorepresentedthemoderatePuritanposition，and，likemanymoderatemen，wasrathersuspectedbybothextremewings，instancedasoneofthehardshipsofthePuritansthattheywerecompelledtousetheprayer-bookofthetime，andthatitcontainedmanymistranslationsofScripture，someofwhichhequoted。Now，itsohappensthattheerrorstowhichhereferredoccurintheBishops\'andtheGreatBible，whichwerethetwoauthorizedversionsofthetime，butareallcorrectedintheGenevanversion。Wedonotknowwhatpointhewastryingtomake，whetherhewasurgingthattheGenevanversionshouldsupplanttheseothers，orwhetherhewascallingforanewtranslation。Indeed，wearenotsurethatheevenmentionedtheGenevanversion。ButJamesspokeuptosaythathehadneveryetseenaBiblewelltranslatedintoEnglish；buttheworstofallhethoughttheGenevantobe。HespokeasthoughhehadjusthadacopygivenhimbyanEnglishlady，andhadalreadynotedwhathecalleditserrors。Thatwasattheveryleastaroyalevasion，foriftherewasanyBookhedidknowitwastheGenevanversion。Hehadbeenfairlyraisedonit；hehadlivedinthecountrywhereitwascommonlyused。Ithadbeenpreachedathimmanyandmanyatime。Indeed，hehaduseditasthetextforthatparaphraseoftheRevelationofwhichwespokeamomentago。
Andheknewitsnotes——wellheknewthem——
knewthattheywerefromrepublicanGeneva，andthatkinglypretensionshadshortshriftwiththem。Jamestoldtheconferencethatthesenoteswere\"verypartial，untrue，seditious，savoringtoomuchoftraitorousanddangerousconceits，\"supportinghisopinionbytwoinstanceswhichseemeddisrespectfultoroyalty。
OneoftheseinstanceswasthenoteonExodus1:17，wheretheEgyptianmidwivesaresaidtohavedisobeyedthekinginthematterofdestroyingthechildren。Thenotesays:\"Theirdisobediencetothekingwaslawful，thoughtheirdissemblingwasnot。\"Jamesquotedthat，andsaid:\"Itisfalse；todisobeythekingisnotlawful，andtraitorousconceitsshouldnotgoforthamongthepeople。\"
SomeoftheHighChurchpartyobjectedthatthereweretranslationsenoughalready；butitstruckJames\'sfancytosetthemallasidebyanotherversion，whichheatoncesaidhewouldorder。Itwastobemadebythemostlearnedofbothuniversities，thentoberevisedbythebishopsandotherChurchdignitaries，thenpresentedtothePrivyCouncil，andfinallytobepasseduponbyhimself。ThereistheechoofsomesharpScotchexperiencesinhisdeclarationthatthereweretobenomarginalnotesinthatnewversion。
Whentheylookedbackontheconference，thePuritansfeltthattheyhadlosteverything，andtheHighChurchpeoplethattheyhadgainedeverything。Oneofthebishops，inaveryservileway，andonhisknee，gavethankstoGodforhavinggiventhecountrysuchaking，whoselikehadneverbeenseensinceChristwasonearth。CertainlyhardtimeswereaheadforthePuritans。TheKingharriedthemaccordingtohisword。WithinsixteenyearssomeofthemlandedatPlymouthRock，andthingsbegantohappenonthisside。ThatsettlementatPlymouthwastheoutcomeofthethreattheKinghadmadeattheHamptonCourtconference。
Butlookingbackonecanseethattheconferencewasworthwhileforthebeginningofthemovementforthenewversion。TheKingwastruetohiswordinthislinealso，andbeforetheyearwasouthadappointedthefifty-fourbestBiblescholarsoftherealmtomakethenewversion。Theyweretositinsixcompaniesofnineeach，twoatOxford，twoatCambridge，andtwoatWestminster。Thenamesofonlyforty-sevenofthemhavecomedowntous，anditisnotknownwhethertheothersevenwereeverappointed，orinwhatwaytheirnameshavebeenlost。ItmustbesaidfortheKingthattheonlyprincipleofselectionwasscholarship，andwhenthosesixgroupsofmenmettheyweremenoftheveryfirstrank，withnopeersoutsidetheirownnumbers——withoneexception，andthatexceptionisofsomepassinginterest。HughBroughtonwasprobablytheforemostHebrewscholarofEngland，perhapsoftheworld，atthetime，andapparentlyhewasnotappointedonthecommittee。Chiefly，itseemstohavebeenbecausehewasamanofungovernabletemperandutterlyunfittedtoworkwithothers。Failuretoappointhim，however，bitandrankled，andtheonlykeenandsharpcriticismthatwaspassedontheversioninitsowndaywasbyHughBroughton。HesentwordtotheKing，afteritwascompleted，thatasforhimselfhewouldratherberenttopiecesbywildhorsesthanhavehadanypartintheurgingofsuchawretchedversionoftheBibleonthepoorpeople。
Thatwassomanifestlypique，however，thatitisonlytoberegrettedthatthetranslationdidnothavethebenefitofhisgreatHebrewknowledge。JohnSelden，athisprimeinthatday，voicedthefeelingofmostscholarsofthetimes，thatthenewtranslationwasthebestintheworldandbestgavethesenseoftheoriginal。
Wedonotknowmuchofthepersonnelofthecompany。Theirnameswouldmeanverylittletousatthisdistance。Allwereclergymenexceptone。Therewerebishops，collegeprincipals，universityfellows，andrectors。Dr。
Reynolds，whosuggesteditinthefirstplace，wasamember，thoughhedidnotlivetoseetheworkfinished。ThisDr。Reynolds，bytheway，waspartytoamostcuriousepisode。HehadbeenanardentRomanCatholic，andhehadabrotherwhowasanequallyardentProtestant。
Theyarguedwitheachothersoearnestlythateachconvincedtheother；theRomanCatholicbecameaProtestant，andtheProtestantbecameaRomanCatholic!Dr。LancelotAndrewes，chairmanofoneofthetwocompaniesthatmetatWestminster，wasprobablythemostlearnedmaninEngland。TheysaidofhimthatifhehadbeenpresentatthetowerofBabelhecouldhaveinterpretedforallthetonguespresent。
Theonlytroublewasthattheworldlackedlearningenoughtoknowhowlearnedhewas。
HiscompanyhadthefirstpartoftheOldTestament，andthesimpledignityofthestyletheyusedshowshowscholarshipandsimplicitygoeasilytogether。Mostpeoplewouldconsiderthattheleastsatisfactorypartoftheworkisthesecondsection，runningfromIChroniclestoEcclesiastes。Aconvertfromanotherfaith，wholearnedtoreadtheBibleinEnglish，onceexpressedtoafriendofmyownhisfeelingthatexceptforthePsalmsandpartsofJob，thereseemedtobehereadistinctletting-downofthedignityofthetranslation。Thereisgoodexcuseforthis，ifitisso，fortwoleadingmembersofthecompanywhohadthatsectionincharge，botheminentCambridgescholars，diedveryearlyinthework，andtheirplaceswerenotfilled。Thethirdcompany，sittingatOxford，werepeculiarlystrong，andhadfortheirportionthehardestpartoftheOldTestament——allthepropheticalwritings。Buttheydidtheirpartwithfinestskill。Thefourthcompany，sittingatCambridge，hadtheApocrypha，thebookswhichliebetweentheOldandtheNewTestamentsforthemostpart，orelsearesupplementaltocertainOldTestamentbooks。Theirworkwasratherhastilyandcertainlypoorlydone，andhasbeendroppedoutofmosteditions。Thefifthcompany，sittingatOxford，withgreatGreekscholarsonit，tooktheGospels，theActs，andtheRevelation。Thiscompanyhadinittheonelayman，SirHenrySavile，thenthegreatestGreekscholarinEngland。ItisthesameSirHenrySavilewhoheard，onhisdeath-bedin1621，thatJameshadwithhisownhandstornfromtheJournalofParliamentthepageswhichboretheprotestinfavoroffreespeechinParliament。Hearingit，thefaithfulscholarprayedtodie，saying:\"Iamreadytodepart，theratherthathavinglivedingoodtimesI
foreseeworse。\"ThesixthcompanymetatWestminsterandtranslatedtheNewTestamentepistles。
Itwastheoriginalplanthatwhenonecompanyhadfinisheditspart，theresultshouldgotoeachoftheothercompanies，comingbackwiththeirsuggestionstotheoriginalworkerstoberecastbythem。Thewholewasthentobereviewedbyasmallercommitteeofscholarstogiveituniformityandtoseeitthroughthepress。Therecordsarenotextantthattellwhetherthiswasdoneinfulldetail，thoughwemaypresumethateachsectionoftheScripturehadthebenefitofthescholarshipoftheentirecompany。
Weknowagooddealofthemethodoftheirwork。Weshallunderstanditbetterbyrecallingwhatmaterialtheyhadathand。Theywereenabledtousetheresultofalltheworkthathadbeendonebeforethem。TheywereinstructedtofollowtheBishops\'Biblewherevertheycoulddosofairly；buttheyweregivenpowertousetheversionsalreadynamedfromWiclifdown，aswellasthosefragmentaryversionswhichwerenumerous，andofwhichnomentionhasbeenmade。TheyransackedallEnglishformsforfelicitouswordsandhappyphrases。ItisoneoftheinterestingincidentsthatthissameHughBroughton，whowasleftoffthecommitteeandtookitsohard，yetwithouthiswillcontributedsomeimportantmattertothetranslation，becausehehadonhisownauthoritymadetranslationsofcertainpartsoftheScripture。SeveralofourcapitalphrasesintheKingJamesversionarefromhim。Therewasnoefforttobreakoutnewpaths。Preferencewasalwaysgiventoafamiliarphraseratherthantoanewone，unlessaccuracyrequiredit。First，then，theyhadthebenefitofalltheworkthathadbeendonebeforeinthesameline，andgladlyusedit。
Inaddition，theyhadallotherversionsmadeinthetonguesofthetime。ChieflytherewasLuther\'sGermanBible，alreadybecomefortheGermantonguewhattheirversionwasdestinedtobefortheEnglishtongue。TherewerepartsoftheBibleavailableinSpanish，French，andDutch。Theywerekeptathandconstantlyforanylighttheymightcastondifficultpassages。
FortheOldTestamenttherewereveryfewHebrewtexts。Therehadbeenlittlecriticalworkyetdoneonthem，andforthemostparttherewereonlydifferenteditionsrunningbackoverthecenturies。Wehavelittlemorethanthatnow，andthereisalmostnonewmaterialontheOldTestamentsincethedaysoftheKingJamestranslators。Therewas，ofcourse，theSeptuagint，theGreektranslationfromtheHebrewmadebeforeChrist，withtheguidanceitcouldgiveindoubtfulplacesontheprobableoriginal。AndfinallytherewastheVulgate，madeintoLatinoutoftheGreekandHebrew。
ThiswasalltheOldTestamentmaterialtheyhad，orthatanyonecouldhaveinviewoftheantiquatedoriginalsources。
TheNewTestamentmaterialwasmoreabundant，thoughnotnearlysoabundantasto-day。Therewerefewmanuscriptsoftheearlydaystowhichtheycouldrefer；buttherewerethetwogreatcriticalversionsoftheNewTestamentinGreek，thatbyErasmusandtheComplutensian，whichhadmadeuseofthebestmanuscriptsknown。Then，finallyagain，therewastheVulgate。
WemuststopamomenttoseewhatwasthevalueoftheVulgateinthiswork。ItisimpossibletoreckonthenumberoftheearlyNewTestamentmanuscriptsthathavebeenlost。
IntheearlierdaytheScripturesweretransmittedfromchurchtochurch，andfromagetoage，bymanuscripts。Manyofthemweremadeasdirectcopiesofothermanuscripts；butmanyweremadebyscribestowhomthemanuscriptswerereadastheywrote，sothattherearemany，thoughordinarilycomparativelyslight，variationsamongthemanuscriptswhichwenowknow。Moremanuscriptsarecomingtolightconstantly，manuscriptsoncewellknownandthenlost。Manyofthem，perhapsmanyearlierthanwenowhave，musthavebeenfamiliartoJeromefourhundredyearsafterChrist。When，therefore，thereisaplaindifferencebetweentheVulgateandourearlyGreekmanuscripts，theVulgatemaybewrongbecauseitisonlyatranslation；
butitmayberightbecauseitisatranslationofearliermanuscriptsthansomeofours。
Itissteadilylosingitsvalueatthatpoint，forGreekmanuscriptsareallthetimecomingtolightwhichrunfartherback。ButwemustnotminimizethevalueoftheVulgateforourKingJamestranslation。
Withallthismaterialthescholarsoftheearlyseventeenthcenturysettowork。Eachmaninthegroupmadethetranslationthatseemedbesttohim，andtogethertheyanalyzedtheresultsandfinallyagreedonthebest。Theyhuntedtheotherversionstoseeifithadbeenbetterdoneelsewhere。TheshadeofTindalewasoveritall。TheGenevanversionwasmostinfluential。TheDouaihaditsshare，andtheBishops\'wasthegeneralstandard，alteredonlywhenaccuracyrequiredit。Onallhardpassagestheycalledtotheiraidtheappropriatedepartmentsofbothuniversities。Allscholarseverywherewereaskedtosendinanycontributions，tocorrectorcriticizeastheywould。Publicannouncementoftheworkwasmade，andallpossiblehelpwasbesoughtandgladlyaccepted。
Veryfaithfullythesegreatestscholarsoftheirtimewrought。Nooneworkedformoney，andnooneworkedforpay，buteachforthejoyoftheworking。Threeyearstheyspentontheoriginalwork，threeyearsoncarefulrevisionandonthemarginalreferencesbywhichScripturewasmadetothrowlightonScripture。
Theninsixmonthsacommitteerevieweditall，putitthroughthepress，andatlast，in1611，withtheimprintofRobertBarker，PrintertotheKing\'sMostExcellentMajesty，theKingJamesversionappeared。ThenameAuthorizedVersionisnotahappyone，forsofarastherecordsgoitwasneverauthorizedeitherbytheKingorthebishop；and，evenifitwere，theauthoritydoesnotextendbeyondtheEnglishChurch，whichisaverysmallfractionofthosewhouseit。Onthetitle-pageoftheoriginalversion，asonsomanysince，isthefamiliarline，\"AppointedtobeReadinChurches，\"butwhomadetheappointmenthistorydoesnotsay。