第12章
加入书架 A- A+
点击下载App,搜索"The Village Labourer",免费读到尾

  thewriteroftheReportonMiddlesex,saysthatthelandproduced£30

  ayear,19*andheremarkthatthisisamuchbetterwayofhelpingthe

  poorthanleavingthemlandfortheiruse。Wemaydoubtwhetherthearrangement

  seemedequallyattractivetothepoor。Itcouldnothavebeenmuchcompensation

  toJohnCarter,whoownedacottage,toreceivethreeroods,twenty-sixperches

  inlieuofhisrightsofcommon,whichishisallotmentintheaward,for

  three-quartersofanacreisobviouslyinsufficientforthepastureofa

  cow,butitwasperhapsstilllesssatisfactoryforJamesCartertoknow

  thatoneacreandsevenpercheswereallottedtothe’lawfulownerorowners’

  ofthecottageandlandwhichheoccupied,andthathisowncompensation

  forthelossofhiscoworsheeporgeesewasthecoldhopethatifhekept

  offtherates,SirWilliamGibbons,thevicar,andtheparishofficersmight

  givehimadole。TheLalehamCommissionerswereevidentlymenofarather

  grimhumour,for,insettingasidethirteenacresforthepoor,theyauthorised

  thechurchwardensandoverseerstoencouragethepoor,iftheyweresominded,

  bylettingthisplotforsixtyyearsandusingthemoneysoreceivedtobuild

  aworkhouse。AmuchmoreliberalprovisionwasmadeatCheshunt,wherethe

  poorwereallowed100acres。AtKnaresboroughandLouth,thepoorgotnothing

  atall。

  Beforeweproceedtodescribetheresultsofenclosureonvillagelife,

  wemayremarkonecuriousfact。In1795and1796therewassomediscussion

  intheHouseofCommonsoftheconditionoftheagriculturallabourers,arising

  outoftheproposalofWhitbread’stoenablethemagistratestofixaminium

  wage。Pittmadealongspeechinreply,andpromisedtointroduceascheme

  ofhisownforcorrectingevilsthatweretooconspiCuoustobeignored。

  Thispromisehekeptnextyearintheill-fatedPoorLawBill,whichdied,

  almostatitsbirth,ofgeneralhostility。ThatBillwillbeconsideredelsewhere。

  AllthatweareconcernedtonoticehereisthatneitherspeechnorBill,

  thoughtheycoverawiderangeoftopics,andthoughPittsaidthatthey

  representedtheresultsoflongandcarefulinquiry,hintatthiscauseof

  socialdisturbance,orattheimportanceofsafe-guardingtheinterestsof

  thepoorinfutureenclosureschemes:thisinspiteofthefactthat,as

  wehaveseen,therewasscarcelyanycontemporarywriterorobserverwho

  hadnotpointedoutthatthewayinwhichthegoverningclasswasconducting

  theserevolutionswasnotonlyunjusttothepoorbutperiloustotheState。

  Itisinteresting,inthelightofthefailuretograspandretrievean

  errorinnationalpolicywhichmarktheprogressofthesetransactions,to

  glanceatthecontemporaryhistoryofFrance。TheLegislativeAssembly,under

  theinfluenceoftheideasoftheeconomists,decreedthedivisionofthe

  landofthecommunesin1792。Thefollowingyearthisdecreewasmodified。

  Certainprovincialassemblieshadaskedfordivision,butmanyofthevillages

  wereinexorablyhostile。ThenewdecreeofJune1793triedtodojustice

  totheseconflictingwishesbymakingdivisionoptional。Atthesametime

  itinsistedonanequitabledivisionincaseswherepartitiontookplace。

  Butthispolicyofdivisionwasfoundtohavedonesuchdamagetotheinterests

  ofthepoorthattherewasstrenuousopposition,withtheresultthatin

  1796theprocesswassuspended,andinthefollowingyearitwasforbidden。20*

  CananyonesupposethatiftheEnglishlegislaturehadhadasswiftand

  readyasenseforthingsgoingwrong,thepolicyofenclosurewouldhave

  beenpursuedafter1801withthesamerecklessdisregardforitssocialconsequences?

  Wehavegiveninthelastchapterthehistoryofanenclosureproject

  forthelightitthrowsontheplayofmotiveintheenclosingclass。We

  proposenowtogiveinsomedetailthehistoryofanenclosureprojectthat

  succeededforthelightitthrowsontheattentionwhichParliamentpaid

  tolocalopinionandonthegenerallyreceivedviewsastotherightsof

  thesmallcommoners。Ourreaderswillobservethatthisenclosuretookplace

  afterthecriticismsandappealswhichwehavedescribedhadallbeenpublished。

  OtmoorisdescribedinDunkin’sHistoryofOxfordshire,21*asa’dreary

  andextensivecommon。’Traditionsaidthatthetractoflandwasthegift

  ofsomemysteriouslady’whogaveasmuchgroundasshecouldrideround

  whileanoat-sheafwasburning,totheinhabitantsofitsvicinityfora

  publiccommon,’andhencecameitsnameofOatmoor,corruptedintoOtmoor。

  Whatevertherealoriginofthename,whichmoreprosaicpersonsconnected

  with’Oc,’aCelticwordfor’water,’thistractoflandhadbeenusedas

  a’publiccommonwithoutstint……fromremoteantiquity。’LordAbingdon,

  indeed,asLordoftheManorofBeckley,claimedandexercisedtheright

  ofappointingamoor-driver,whoatcertainseasonsdroveallthecattle

  intoBeckley,wherethosewhichwereunidentifiedbecameLordAbingdon’s

  property。LordAbingdonalsoclaimedrightsofsoilandofsport:these,

  likehisotherclaim,werefoundedonprescriptiononly,astherewasno

  traceofanygrantfromtheCrown。

  TheusetowhichOtmoor,initsoriginalstate,wasput,isthusdescribed

  byDunkin。’Whilstthisextensivepieceoflandremainedunenclosed,the

  farmersoftheseveraladjoiningtownshipsestimatedtheprofitsofasummer’s

  pasturageat20s。perhead,subjecttotheoccasionallossofabeastby

  apeculiardistempercalledthemoor-evil。Butthegreatestbenefitwasreaped

  bythecottagers,manyofwhomturnedoutlargenumbersofgeese,towhich

  thecoarseaquaticswardwaswellsuited,andtherebybroughtuptheirfamilies

  incomparativeplenty。22*

  ’Oflateyears,however,thisdrearywastewassurveyedwithlongingeyes

  bythesurroundinglandowners,mostofwhomwishedtoannexaportionof

  ittotheirestates,andinconsequencesparednopainstorecommendthe

  enclosureasameasurebeneficialtothecountry。’

  Thepromotersoftheenclosurecreditedthemselveswithfarloftiermotives:

  prominentamongthembeingadesiretoimprovethemoralsofthepoor。An

  advocateoftheenclosureafterwardsdescribedthepitiablestateofthe

  poorinpre-enclosuredaysinthesewords:’Inlookingafterabroodofgoslings,

  afewrottensheep,askeletonofacoworamangyhorse,theylostmore

  thantheymighthavegainedbytheirday’swork,andacquiredhabitsofidleness

  anddissipationandadisliketohonestlabour,whichhasrenderedthemthe

  riotousandlawlesssetofmenwhichtheyhavenowshownthemselvestobe。’

  ApiouswishtosecondtheintentionofProvidencewasalsoastrongincentive:

  ’Goddidnotcreatetheearthtoliewasteforfeedingafewgeese,butto

  becultivatedbyman,inthesweatofhisbrow。’23*

  ThefirstproposalforenclosurecametoParliamentfromGeorge,Duke

  ofMarlborough,andotherson11thMarch,1801。Thedukepetitionedforthe

  drainageandtheallotmentofthe4000acresofOtmooramongtheparishes

  concerned,namelyBeckleywithHortonandStudley,Noke,Oddington,and

  CharltonwithFencottandMoorcott。ThispetitionwasreferredtoaCommittee,

  toconsideramongstotherthings,whethertheStandingOrderswithreference

  todrainageBillshadbeendulycompliedwith。TheCommitteereportedin

  favourofallowingtheintroductionoftheBill,butmadethisremarkable

  admission,thatthoughtheStandingOrderswithrespecttotheaffixingof

  noticesonchurchdoorshadbeencompliedwithonSunday,3rdAugust,’it

  appearedtotheCommitteethatonthefollowingSunday,the10thofAugust,

  thePersonemployedtoaffixthelikeNoticeswaspreventedfromsodoing

  atBeckley,OddingtonandCharlton,byaMobateachPlace,butthatheread

  theNoticestothePersonsassembled,andafterwardsthrewthemamongstthem

  intotheChurchYardsofthoseParishes。’NoticewasdulyaffixedthatSunday

  atNoke。ThenextSundaymatterswereevenworse,fornonoticeswereallowed

  tobefixedinanyparish。

  TheBillthatwasintroducedinspiteofthislocalprotest,wasshipwrecked

  duringitsCommitteestagebyapetitionfromAlexanderCroke,LL。D。,Lord

  oftheManorofStudleywithWhitecrossGreen,andfromJohnMackaness,Esq。,

  whostatedthatasproprietorsintheparishofBeckley,theirinterests

  hadnotbeensufficientlyconsidered。

  ThenextapplicationtoParliamentwasnotmadetill1814。Intheinterval

  variousplanswerepropounded,andArthurYoung,inhisSurveyofOxfordshire

  fortheBoardofAgriculture,publishedin1809aworkwhichDunkindescribes

  assupportedbythefarmersandtheirlandlordsandashavingcaughttheir

  strain,lamentedthewretchedstateoftheland。’Imadevariousinquiries

  intothepresentvalueofitbyrightsofcommonage;butcouldascertain

  nomorethanthegeneralfact,ofitsbeingtoaverybeggarlyamount……

  Uponthewhole,thepresentproducemustbequitecontemptible,whencompared

  withthebenefitwhichwouldresultfromenclosingit。AndIcannotbutremark,

  thatsuchatractofwastelandinsummer,andcoveredthewinterthrough

  withwater,toremaininsuchastate,withinfivemilesofOxfordandthe

  Thames,inakingdomthatregularlyimportstotheamountofamillionsterling

  incorn,andisalmostperiodicallyvisitedwithapprehensionsofwant——

  isascandaltothenationalpolicy……Ifdrainedandenclosed,itissaid

  thatnodifficultywouldoccurinlettingitat30s。peracre,andsomeassert

  even40s。’p。228。

  WhenthenewapplicationwasmadeinNovember1814,itwasagainreferred

  toaCommittee,whoagainhadtoreportturbulentbehaviourinthedistrict

  concerned。Noticeshadbeenfixedonallthechurchdoorson7thAugust,

  andonthreedoorson14thAugust,’butitwasfoundimpracticabletoaffix

  theNoticesontheChurchdoorsoftheothertwoParishesonthatday,owing

  tolargeMobs,armedwitheverydescriptionofoffensiveweapons,having

  assembledfortheproseofobstructingthepersonswhowenttoaffixthe

  Notices,andwhowerepreventedbyviolence,andthreatsofimmediatedeath,

  fromapproachingtheChurches。’24*Fromthesamecausenonoticescould

  beaffixedonthesetwochurchdoorson21stor28thAugust。

  TheselocaldisturbanceswerenotallowedtocheckthecareeroftheBill。

  Itwasreadafirsttimeon21stFebruary,andasecondtimeon7thMarch。

  Butmeanwhilesomeseriousflawshadbeendiscovered。TheDukeofMarlborough

  andtheEarlofAbingdonbothpetitionedagainstit。TheCommittee,however,

  wereabletointroduceamendmentsthatsatisfiedboththesepowerfulpersonages,

  andon1stMayMr。FanereportedfromtheCommitteethatnopersonshadappeared

  forthesaidpetitions,andthatthepartiesconcernedhadconsentedtothe

  satisfactionoftheCommittee,andhadalsoconsented’tothechangingthe

  Commissionersthereinnamed。’BeforetheReporthadbeenpassed,however,

  apetitionwasreceivedonbehalfofAlexanderCroke,25*Esq。,whowas

  nowinNovaScotia,whichmadefurtheramendmentsnecessary,andtheCommittee

  wasempoweredtosendforpersons,papersandrecords。Meanwhilethehumbler

  individualswhosefuturewasimperilledwerealsobestirringthemselves。

  TheyappliedtotheKeeperoftheRecordsintheAugmentationOfficefor

  areportonthehistoryofOtmoor。ThisReport,whichispublishedatlength

  byDunkin,26*statesthatinspiteoflaboriousresearchnomentionof

  OtmoorcouldbefoundinanysinglerecordfromthetimeofWilliamtheConqueror

  tothepresentday。EvenDoomsdayBookcontainednoreferencetoit。Nowhere

  diditappearinwhatmanorOtmoorwascomprehended,norwasthereanyrecord

  thatanyofthelordsofneighbouringmanorshadeverbeenmadecapableof

  enjoyinganyrightsofcommonuponit。Thecustomofusagewithoutstint,

  infact,pointedtosomegrantbeforethememoryofman,andmadeitunlikely

  thatanylordofthemanorhadeverhadabsoluterightofsoil。Armed,no

  doubt,withthislearnedreport,some’Freeholders,Landholders,Cottagers

  andPersons’residinginfourparishessentupapetitionaskingtobeheard

  againsttheBill。Buttheyweretoolate:theirpetitionwasorderedtolie

  ontheTable,andtheBillpassedtheCommonsthesameday26thJuneand

  receivedtheRoyalAssenton12thJuly。

  TheActdirectedthatone-sixteenthofthewholewhichwasstatedto

  beover4000acresshouldbegiventotheLordoftheManorofBeckley,

  LordAbingdon,incompensationofhisrightsofsoil,andone-eighthascomposition

点击下载App,搜索"The Village Labourer",免费读到尾