第2章
加入书架 A- A+
点击下载App,搜索"Philosophy of Spirit",免费读到尾

  §408。

  ii。InsanityInconsequenceoftheimmediacy,whichstillmarkstheself—feeling,i。e。inconsequenceoftheelementofcorporealitywhichisstillundetachedfromthementallife,andasthefeelingtooisitselfparticularandboundupwithaspecialcorporealform,itfollowsthatalthoughthesubjecthasbeenbroughttoacquireintelligentconsciousness,itisstillsusceptibleofdisease,sofarastoremainfastinaspecialphaseofitsself—feeling,unabletorefineitto’ideality’andgetthebetterofit。Thefullyfurnishedselfofintelligentconsciousnessisaconscioussubject,whichisconsistentinitselfaccordingtoanorderandbehaviourwhichfollowsfromitsindividualpositionanditsconnectionwiththeexternalworld,whichisnolessaworldoflaw。Butwhenitisengrossedwithasinglephaseoffeeling,itfailstoassignthatphaseitsproperplaceandduesubordinationintheindividualsystemoftheworldwhichaconscioussubjectis。Inthiswaythesubjectfindsitselfincontradictionbetweenthetotalitysystematizedinitsconsciousness,andthesinglephaseorfixedideawhichisnotreducedtoitsproperplaceandrank。ThisisInsanityormentalDerangement。

  Inconsideringinsanitywemust,asinothercases,anticipatethefull—grownandintelligentconscioussubject,whichisatthesametimethenaturalselfofself—feeling。Insuchaphasetheselfcanbeliabletothecontradictionbetweenitsownfreesubjectivityandaparticularitywhich,insteadofbeing’idealized’intheformer,remainsasafixedelementinself—feeling。Mindassuchisfree,andthereforenotsusceptibleofthismalady。Butinoldermetaphysicsmindwastreatedasasoul,asathing;anditisonlyasathing,i。e。assomethingnaturalandexistent,thatitisliabletoinsanity—thesettledfixtureofsomefiniteelementinit。Insanityisthereforeapsychicaldisease,i。e。adiseaseofbodyandmindalike:thecommencementmayappeartostartfromtheonemorethantheother,andsoalsomaythecure。

  Theself—possessedandhealthysubjecthasanactiveandpresentconsciousnessoftheorderedwholeofhisindividualworld,intothesystemofwhichhesubsumeseachspecialcontentofsensation,idea,desire,inclination,etc。,asitarises,soastoinsertthemintheirproperplace,Heisthedominantgeniusovertheseparticularities。Betweenthisandinsanitythedifferenceislikethatbetweenwakinganddreaming:onlythatininsanitythedreamfallswithinthewakinglimits,andsomakespartoftheactualself—feeling。Errorandthatsortofthingisapropositionconsistentlyadmittedtoaplaceintheobjectiveinterconnectionofthings。Intheconcrete,however,itisoftendifficulttosaywhereitbeginstobecomederangement。Aviolent,butgroundlessandsenselessoutburstofhatred,etc。,may,incontrasttoapresupposedhigherself—possessionandstabilityofcharacter,makeitsvictimseemtobebesidehimselfwithfrenzy。Butthemainpointinderangementisthecontradictionwhichafeelingwithafixedcorporealembodimentsetsupagainstthewholemassofadjustmentsformingtheconcreteconsciousness。Themindwhichisinaconditionofmerebeing,andwheresuchbeingisnotrenderedfluidinitsconsciousness,isdiseased。Thecontentswhicharesetfreeinthisreversiontomerenaturearetheself—seekingaffectionsoftheheart,suchasvanity,pride,andtherestofthepassions—fanciesandhopes—

  merelypersonalloveandhatred。Whentheinfluenceofself—possessionandofgeneralprinciples,moralandtheoretical,isrelaxed,andceasestokeepthenaturaltemperunderlockandkey,the,earthlyelementsaresetfree—thatevilwhichisalwayslatentintheheart,becausetheheartasimmediateisnaturalandselfish。Itistheevilgeniusofmanwhichgainstheupperhandininsanity,butindistinctionfromandcontrasttothebetterandmoreintelligentpart,whichistherealso。

  Hencethisstateismentalderangementanddistress。Therightpsychicaltreatmentthereforekeepsinviewthetruththatinsanityisnotanabstractlossofreason(neitherinthepointofintelligencenorofwillanditsresponsibility),butonlyderangement,onlyacontradictioninastillsubsistingreason;—justasphysicaldiseaseisnotanabstract,i。e。mereandtotal,lossofhealth(ifitwerethat,itwouldbedeath),butacontradictioninit。Thishumanetreatment,nolessbenevolentthanreasonable(theservicesofPineltowardswhichdeservethehighestacknowledgement),presupposesthepatient’srationality,andinthatassumptionhasthesoundbasisfordealingwithhimonthisside—justasinthecaseofbodilydiseasethephysicianbaseshistreatmentonthevitalitywhichassuchstillcontainshealth。

  (c)Habit§409。

  Self—feeling,immersedinthedetailofthefeelings(insimplesensations,andalsodesires,instincts,passions,andtheirgratification),isundistinguishedfromthem。Butintheselfthereislatentasimpleself—relationofideality,anominaluniversality(whichisthetruthofthesedetails):andassouniversal,theselfistobestampedupon,andmadeappearin,thislifeoffeeling,yetsoastodistinguishitselffromtheparticulardetails,andbearealizeduniversality。Butthisuniversalityisnotthefullandsterlingtruthofthespecificfeelingsanddesires;whattheyspecificallycontainisasyetleftoutofaccount。Andsotootheparticularityis,asnowregarded,equallyformal;itcountsonlyastheparticularbeingorimmediacyofthesoulinoppositiontoitsequallyformalandabstractrealization。Thisparticularbeingofthesoulisthefactorofitscorporeity;herewehaveitbreakingwiththiscorporeity,distinguishingitfromitself—itselfasimplebeing—andbecomingthe’ideal’,subjectivesubstantialityofit—justasinitslatentnotion(§389)itwasthesubstance,andthemeresubstance,ofit。

  Butthisabstractrealizationofthesoulinitscorporealvehicleisnotyettheself—nottheexistenceoftheuniversalwhichisfortheuniversal。Itisthecorporeityreducedtoitsmereideality;andsofaronlydoescorporeitybelongtothesoulassuch。Thatistosay,justasspaceandtimeastheabstractone—outside—another,as,therefore,emptyspaceandemptytime,areonlysubjectiveforms,apureactofintuition;soisthatpurebeing(which,throughthesupersessioninitoftheparticularityofthecorporeity,oroftheimmediatecorporeityassuch,hasrealizeditself)mereintuitionandnomore,lackingconsciousness,butthebasisofconsciousness。Andconsciousnessitbecomes,whenthecorporcity,ofwhichitisthesubjectivesubstance,andwhichstillcontinuestoexist,andthatasabarrierforit,hasbeenabsorbedbyit,andithasbeeninvestedwiththecharacterofself—centredsubject。

  §410。

  Thesoul’smakingitselfanabstractuniversalbeing,andreducingtheparticularsoffeelings(andofconsciousness)toamerefeatureofitsbeingisHabit。Inthismannerthesoulhasthecontentsinpossession,andcontainstheminsuchmannerthatinthesefeaturesitisnotassentient,nordoesitstandinrelationshipwiththemasdistinguishingitselffromthem,norisabsorbedinthem,buthasthemandmovesinthem,withoutfeelingorconsciousnessofthefact。Thesoulisfreedfromthem,sofarasitisnotinterestedinoroccupiedwiththem:andwhilstexistingintheseformsasitspossession,itisatthesametimeopentobeotherwiseoccupiedandengaged—saywithfeelingandwithmentalconsciousnessingeneral。

  Thisprocessofbuildinguptheparticularandcorporealexpressionsoffeelingintothebeingofthesoulappearsasarepetitionofthem,andthegenerationofhabitaspractice。For,thisbeingofthesoul,ifinrespectofthenaturalparticularphaseitbecalledanabstractuniversalitytowhichtheformeristransmuted,isareflexiveuniversality(§175);i。e。theoneandthesame,thatrecursinaseriesofunitsofsensation,isreducedtounity,andthisabstractunityexpresslystated。

  Habitlikememory,isadifficultpointinmentalorganization:habitisthemechanismofself—feeling,asmemoryisthemechanismofintelligence。Thenaturalqualitiesandalterationsofage,sleep,andwakingare’immediately’natural:habit,onthecontrary,isthemodeoffeeling(aswellasintelligence,will,etc。,sofarastheybelongtoself—feeling)madeintoanaturalandmechanicalexistence。Habitisrightlycalledasecondnature;nature,becauseitisanimmediatebeingofthesoul;asecondnature,becauseitisanimmediacycreatedbythesoul,impressingandmouldingthecorporealitywhichentersintothemodesoffeelingassuchandintotherepresentationsandvolitionssofarastheyhavetakencorporealform(§401)。

  Inhabitthehumanbeing’smodeofexistenceis’natural’,andforthatreasonnotfree;butstillfree,sofarasthemerelynaturalphaseoffeelingisbyhabitreducedtoamerebeingofhis,andheisnolongerinvoluntarilyattractedorrepelledbyit,andsonolongerinterested,occupied,ordependentinregardtoit。Thewantoffreedominhabitispartlymerelyformal,ashabitmerelyattachestothebeingofthesoul;partlyonlyrelative,sofarasitstrictlyspeakingarisesonlyinthecaseofbadhabits,orsofarasahabitisopposedbyanotherpurpose:whereasthehabitofrightandgoodnessisanembodimentofliberty。ThemainpointaboutHabitisthatbyitsmeansmangetsemancipatedfromthefeelings,eveninbeingaffectedbythem。Thedifferentformsofthismaybedescribedasfollows:

  (a)Theimmediatefeelingisnegatedandtreatedasindifferent。Onewhogetsinuredagainstexternalsensations(frost,heat,wearinessofthelimbs,etc。,sweettastes,etc。),andwhohardenstheheartagainstmisfortune,acquiresastrengthwhichconsistsinthis,thatalthoughthefrost,etc。—orthemisfortune—isfelt,theaffectionisdeposedtoamereexternalityandimmediacy;theuniversalpsychicallifekeepsitsownabstractindependenceinit,andtheself—feelingassuch,consciousness,reflection,andanyotherpurposesandactivity,arenolongerbotheredwithit。

  (b)Thereisindifferencetowardsthesatisfaction:thedesiresandimpulsesarebythehabitoftheirsatisfactiondeadened。Thisistherationalliberationfromthem;whereasmonasticrenunciationandforcibleinterferencedonotfreefromthem,noraretheyinconceptionrational。Ofcourseinallthisitisassumedthattheimpulsesarekeptasthefinitemodestheynaturallyare,andthatthey,liketheirsatisfaction,aresubordinatedaspartialfactorstothereasonablewill。

  (c)Inhabitregardedasaptitude,orskill,notmerelyhastheabstractpsychicallifetobekeptintactperse,butithastobeimposedasasubjectiveaim,tobemadeapowerinthebodilypart,whichisrenderedsubjectandthoroughlypervioustoit。Conceivedashavingtheinwardpurposeofthesubjectivesoulthusimposeduponit,thebodyistreatedasanimmediateexternalityandabarrier。Thuscomesoutthemoredecidedrupturebetweenthesoulassimpleself—concentration,anditsearliernaturalnessandimmediacy;ithaslostitsoriginalandimmediateidentitywiththebodilynature,andasexternalhasfirsttobereducedtothatposition。Specificfeelingscanonlygetbodilyshapeinaperfectlyspecificway(§

  410);andtheimmediateportionofbodyisaparticularpossibilityforaspecificaim(aparticularaspectofitsdifferentiatedstructure,aparticularorganofitsorganicsystem)。Tomouldsuchanaimintheorganicbodyistobringoutandexpressthe’ideality’whichisimplicitinmatteralways,andespeciallysointhespecificbodilypart,andthustoenablethesoul,underitsvolitionalandconceptualcharacters,toexistassubstanceinitscorporeity。Inthiswayanaptitudeshowsthecorporeityrenderedcompletelypervious,madeintoaninstrument,sothatwhentheconception(e。g。aseriesofmusicalnotes)isinme,thenwithoutresistanceandwitheasethebodygivesthemcorrectutterance。

  Theformofhabitappliestoallkindsandgradesofmentalaction。Themostexternalofthem,i。e。

  thespatialdirectionofanindividual,viz。hisuprightposture,hasbeenbywillmadeahabit—apositiontakenwithoutadjustmentandwithoutconsciousness—whichcontinuestobeanaffairofhispersistentwill;forthemanstandsonlybecauseandinsofarashewillstostand,andonlysolongashewillsitwithoutconsciousness。Similarlyoureyesightistheconcretehabitwhich,withoutanexpressadjustment,combinesinasingleacttheseveralmodificationsofsensation,consciousness,intuition,intelligence,etc。,whichmakeitup。Thinking,too,howeverfreeandactiveinitsownpureelementitbecomes,nolessrequireshabitandfamiliarity(thisimpromptuityorformofimmediacy),bywhichitisthepropertyofmysingleselfwhereIcanfreelyandinalldirectionsrange。ItisthroughthishabitthatIcometorealizemyexistenceasathinkingbeing。

  Evenhere,inthisspontaneityofself—centredthought,thereisapartnershipofsoulandbody(hence,wantofhabitandtoo—long—continuedthinkingcauseheadache);habitdiminishesthisfeeling,bymakingthenaturalfunctionanimmediacyofthesoul。Habitonanamplerscale,andcarriedoutinthestrictlyintellectualrange,isrecollectionandmemory,whereofweshallspeaklater。

  Habitisoftenspokenofdisparaginglyandcalledlifeless,casual,andparticular。Anditistruethattheformofhabit,likeanyother,isopentoanythingwechancetoputintoit;anditishabitoflivingwhichbringsondeath,or,ifquiteabstract,isdeathitself:andyethabitisindispensablefortheexistenceofallintellectuallifeintheindividual,enablingthesubjecttobeaconcreteimmediacy,an’ideality’ofsoul—enablingthematterofconsciousness,religious,moral,etc。,tobehisasthisself,thissoul,andnoother,andbeneitheramerelatentpossibility,noratransientemotionoridea,noranabstractinwardness,cutofffromactionandreality,butpartandparcelofhisbeing。

  Inscientificstudiesofthesoulandthemind,habitisusuallypassedover—eitherassomethingcontemptible—orratherforthefurtherreasonthatitisoneofthemostdifficultquestionsofpsychology。

  (C)THEACTUALSOUL

  §411。

  TheSoul,whenitscorporeityhasbeenmouldedandmadethoroughlyitsown,findsitselfthereasinglesubject;andthecorporeityisanexternalitywhichstandsasapredicate,inbeingrelatedtowhich,itisrelatedtoitself。Thisexternality,inotherwords,representsnotitself,butthesoul,ofwhichitisthesign。Inthisidentityofinteriorandexterior,thelattersubjecttotheformer,thesoulisactual:initscorporeityithasitsfreeshape,inwhichitfeelsitselfandmakesitselffelt,andwhichastheSoul’sworkofarthashumanpathognomicandphysiognomicexpression。

  Undertheheadofhumanexpressionareincluded,forexample,theuprightfigureingeneral,andtheformationofthelimbs,especiallythehand,astheabsoluteinstrument,ofthemouth—laughter,weeping,etc。,andthenoteofmentalitydiffusedoverthewhole,whichatonceannouncesthebodyastheexternalityofahighernature。Thisnoteissoslight,indefinite,andinexpressibleamodification,becausethefigureinitsexternalityissomethingimmediateandnatural,andcanthereforeonlybeanindefiniteandquiteimperfectsignforthemind,unabletorepresentitinitsactualuniversality。Seenfromtheanimalworld,thehumanfigureisthesupremephaseinwhichmindmakesanappearance。Butfortheminditisonlyitsfirstappearance,whilelanguageisitsperfectexpression。Andthehumanfigure,thoughtheproximatephaseofmind’sexistence,isatthesametimeinitsphysiognomicandpathognomicqualitysomethingcontingenttoit。Totrytoraisephysiognomyandaboveallcranioscopy(phrenology)totherankofsciences,wasthereforeoneofthevainestfancies,stillvainerthanasignaturarerum,whichsupposedtheshapeofaplanttoaffordindicationofitsmedicinalvirtue。

  §412。

  Implicitlythesoulshowstheuntruthandunrealityofmatter;forthesoul,initsconcentratedself,cutsitselfofffromitsimmediatebeing,placingthelatteroveragainstitasacorporeityincapableofofferingresistancetoitsmouldinginfluence。Thesoul,thussettinginoppositionitsbeingtoits(conscious)self,absorbingit,andmakingititsown,haslostthemeaningofmeresoul,orthe’immediacy’ofmind。Theactualsoulwithitssensationanditsconcreteself—feelingturnedintohabit,hasimplicitlyrealisedthe’ideality’ofitsqualities;inthisexternalityithasrecollectedandinwardizeditself,andisinfiniteself—relation。Thisfreeuniversalitythusmadeexplicitshowsthesoulawakingtothehigherstageoftheego,orabstractuniversality,insofarasitisfortheabstractuniversality。Inthiswayitgainsthepositionofthinkerandsubject—speciallyasubjectofthejudgementinwhichtheegoexcludesfromitselfthesumtotalofitsmerelynaturalfeaturesasanobject,aworldexternaltoit—butwithsuchrespecttothatobjectthatinititisimmediatelyreflectedintoitself。ThussoulrisestobecomeConsciousness。

  413。

  B。PHENOMENOLOGYOFMIND

  CONSCIOUSNESS

  (a)ConsciousnessProper—(b)Self—Consciousness—(c)ReasonConsciousnessconstitutesthereflectedorcorrelationalgradeofmind:thegradeofmindasappearance。Egoisinfiniteself—relationofmind,butassubjectiveorasself—certainty。Theimmediateidentityofthenaturalsoulhasbeenraisedtothispure’ideal’self—identity;andwhattheformercontainedisforthisself—subsistentreflectionsetforthasanobject。Thepureabstractfreedomofmindletsgofromititsspecificqualities—thesoul’snaturallife—toanequalfreedomasanindependentobject。Itisofthislatter,asexternaltoit,thattheegoisinthefirstinstanceaware(conscious),andassuchitisConsciousness。Ego,asthisabsolutenegativity,isimplicitlytheidentityintheotherness:theegoisitselfthatotherandstretchesovertheobject(asifthatobjectwereimplicitlycancelled)—itisonesideoftherelationshipandthewholerelationship—thelight,whichmanifestsitselfandsomethingelsetoo。

  §414。

  Theself—identityofthemind,thusfirstmadeexplicitastheEgo,isonlyitsabstractformalideality。

  Assoulitwasunderthephaseofsubstantialuniversality;now,assubjectivereflectioninitself,itisreferredtothissubstantialityastoitsnegative,somethingdarkandbeyondit。Henceconsciousness,likereciprocaldependenceingeneral,isthecontradictionbetweentheindependenceofthetwosidesandtheiridentityinwhichtheyaremergedintoone。Themindasegoisessence;butsincereality,inthesphereofessence,isrepresentedasinimmediatebeingandatthesametimeas’ideal’,itisasconsciousnessonlytheappearance(phenomenon)ofmind。

  §415。

  Astheegoisbyitselfonlyaformalidentity,thedialecticalmovementofitsintelligibleunity,i。e。thesuccessivestepsinfurtherspecificationofconsciousness,doesnot,toit,seemtobeitsownactivity,butisimplicit,andtotheegoitseemsanalterationoftheobject。Consciousnessconsequentlyappearsdifferentlymodifiedaccordingtothedifferenceofthegivenobject;andthegradualspecificationofconsciousnessappearsasavariationinthecharacteristicsofitsobjects。

  Ego,thesubjectofconsciousness,isthinking:thelogicalprocessofmodifyingtheobjectiswhatisidenticalinsubjectandobject,theirabsoluteinterdependence,whatmakestheobjectthesubject’sown。

  TheKantianphilosophymaybemostaccuratelydescribedashavingviewedthemindasconsciousness,andascontainingthepropositionsonlyofaphenomenology(notofaphilosophy)

  ofmind。TheEgoKantregardsasreferencetosomethingawayandbeyond(whichinitsabstractdescriptionistermedthething—in—itself);anditisonlyfromthisfinitepointofviewthathetreatsbothintellectandwill。ThoughinthenotionofapowerofreflectivejudgementhetouchesupontheIdeaofmind—asubject—objectivity,anintuitiveintellect,etc。,andeventheIdeaofNature,stillthisIdeaisagaindeposedtoanappearance,i。e。toasubjectivemaxim(§58)。ReinholdmaythereforebesaidtohavecorrectlyappreciatedKantismwhenhetreateditasatheoryofconsciousness(underthenameof’facultyofideation’)。Fichtekepttothesamepointofview:hisnon—egoisonlysomethingsetoveragainsttheego,onlydefinedasinconsciousness:itismadenomorethananinfinite’shock’,i。e。athing—in—itself。Bothsystemsthereforehaveclearlynotreachedtheintelligibleunityorthemindasitactuallyandessentiallyis,butonlyasitisinreferencetosomethingelse。

  AsagainstSpinozism,again,itistobenotedthatthemindinthejudgementbywhichit’constitutes’itselfanego(afreesubjectcontrastedwithitsqualitativeaffection)hasemergedfromsubstance,andthatthephilosophy,whichgivesthisjudgementastheabsolutecharacteristicofmind,hasemergedfromSpinozism。

  §416。

  Theaimofconsciousmindistomakeitsappearanceidenticalwithitsessence,toraiseitsself—certaintytotruth。Theexistenceofmindinthestageofconsciousnessisfinite,becauseitismerelyanominalself—relation,ormerecertainty。Theobjectisonlyabstractlycharacterizedasits;

  inotherwords,intheobjectitisonlyasanabstractegothatthemindisreflectedintoitself:henceitsexistencetherehasstillacontent,whichisnotasitsown。

  §417。

  Thegradesofthiselevationofcertaintytotrutharethreeinnumber:first(a)consciousnessingeneral,withanobjectsetagainstit;(b)self—consciousness,forwhichegoistheobject;(c)unityofconsciousnessandself—consciousness,wherethemindseesitselfembodiedintheobjectandseesitselfasimplicitlyandexplicitlydeterminate,asReason,thenotionofmind。

  (a)CONSCIOUSNESSPROPER

  i。Sensuousconsciousness§418。

  Consciousnessis,first,immediateconsciousness,anditsreferencetotheobjectaccordinglythesimple,andunderivedcertaintyofit。Theobjectsimilarly,beingimmediate,anexistent,reflectedinitself,isfurthercharacterizedasimmediatelysingular。Thisissense—consciousness。

  Consciousness—asacaseofcorrelation—comprisesonlythecategoriesbelongingtotheabstractegoorformalthinking;andtheseittreatsasfeaturesoftheobject(§415)。Sense—consciousnessthereforeisawareoftheobjectasanexistent,asomething,anexistingthing,asingular,andsoon。

  Itappearsaswealthiestinmatter,butaspoorestinthought。Thatwealthofmatterismadeoutofsensations:theyarethematerialofconsciousness(§414),thesubstantialandqualitative,whatthesoulinitsanthropologicalsphereisandfindsinitself。Thismaterialtheego(thereflectionofthesoulinitself)separatesfromitself,andputsitfirstunderthecategoryofbeing。SpatialandtemporalSingularness,hereandnow(thetermsbywhichinthePhenomenologyoftheMind(Werkeii,p。73),Idescribedtheobjectofsense—consciousness)strictlybelongstointuition。Atpresenttheobjectisatfirsttobeviewedonlyinitscorrelationtoconsciousness,i。e。asomethingexternaltoit,andnotyetasexternalonitsownpart,orasbeingbesideandoutofitself。

  §419。

  Thesensibleassomewhatbecomesanother:thereflectioninitselfofthissomewhat,thething,hasmanyproperties;andasasingle(thing)initsimmediacyhasseveralpredicates。Themuchnessofthesense—singularthusbecomesabreadth—avarietyofrelations,reflectionalattributes,anduniversalities。Thesearelogicaltermsintroducedbythethinkingprinciple,i。e。inthiscasebytheEgo,todescribethesensible。ButtheEgoasitselfapparentseesinallthischaracterizationachangeintheobject;andsensuousconsciousness,soconstruingtheobject,issense—perception。

  ii。Sense—perception§420。

  Consciousness,havingpassedbeyondthesensible,wantstotaketheobjectinitstruth,notasmerelyimmediate,butasmediated,reflectedinitself,anduniversal。Suchanobjectisacombinationofsensequalitieswithattributesofwiderrangebywhichthoughtdefinesconcreterelationsandconnections。Hencetheidentityofconsciousnesswiththeobjectpassesfromtheabstractidentityof’Iamsure’tothedefiniteidentityof’Iknow,andamaware’。

  TheparticulargradeofconsciousnessonwhichKantismconceivesthemindisperception:whichisalsothegeneralpointofviewtakenbyordinaryconsciousness,andmoreorlessbythesciences。Thesensuouscertitudesofsingleapperceptionsorobservationsformthestarting—point:

  thesearesupposedtobeelevatedtotruth,bybeingregardedintheirbearings,reflectedupon,andonthelinesofdefinitecategoriesturnedatthesametimeintosomethingnecessaryanduniversal,viz。experiences。

  §421。

  Thisconjunctionofindividualanduniversalisadmixture—theindividualremainsatthebottomhardandunaffectedbytheuniversal,towhich,however,itisrelated。Itisthereforeatissueofcontradictions—betweenthesinglethingsofsenseapperception,whichformtheallegedgroundofgeneralexperience,andtheuniversalitywhichhasahigherclaimtobetheessenceandground—

  betweentheindividualityofathingwhich,takeninitsconcretecontent,constitutesitsindependenceandthevariouspropertieswhich,freefromthisnegativelinkandfromoneanother,areindependentuniversalmatters(§123)。Thiscontradictionofthefinitewhichrunsthroughallformsofthelogicalspheresturnsoutmostconcrete,whenthesomewhatisdefinedasobject(§§

  194seqq。)。

  iii。TheIntellect§422。

  Theproximatetruthofperceptionisthatitistheobjectwhichisanappearance,andthattheobject’sreflectioninselfisonthecontraryaself—subsistentinwardanduniversal。Theconsciousnessofsuchanobjectisintellect。Thisinward,aswecalledit,ofthethingis,ononehand,thesuppressionofthemultiplicityofthesensible,and,inthatmanner,anabstractidentity:ontheotherhand,however,italsoforthatreasoncontainsthemultiplicity,butasaninterior’simple’

  difference,whichremainsself—identicalinthevicissitudesofappearance。Thesimpledifferenceistherealmofthelawsofthephenomena—acopyofthephenomenon,butbroughttorestanduniversality。

  §423。

  Thelaw,atfirststatingthemutualdependenceofuniversal,permanentterms,has,insofarasitsdistinctionistheinwardone,itsnecessityonitsownpart;theoneoftheterms,asnotexternallydifferentfromtheother,liesimmediatelyintheother。Butinthismannertheinteriordistinctionis,whatitisintruth,thedistinctiononitsownpart,orthedistinctionwhichisnone。Withthisnewform—characteristic,onthewhole,consciousnessimplicitlyvanishes:forconsciousnessassuchimpliesthereciprocalindependenceofsubjectandobject。Theegoinitsjudgementhasanobjectwhichisnotdistinctfromit—ithasitself。Consciousnesshaspassedintoself—consciousness。

  (b)SELF—CONSCIOUSNESS

  §424。

  Self—consciousnessisthetruthofconsciousness:thelatterisaconsequenceoftheformer,allconsciousnessofanotherobjectbeingasamatteroffactalsoself—consciousness。Theobjectismyidea:Iamawareoftheobjectasmine;andthusinitIamawareofme。Theformulaofself—consciousnessisI=I:—abstractfreedom,pure’Ideality’;andthusitlacks’reality’:forasitisitsownobject,thereisstrictlyspeakingnoobject,becausethereisnodistinctionbetweenitandtheobject。

  §425。

  Abstractself—consciousnessisthefirstnegationofconsciousness,andforthatreasonitisburdenedwithanexternalobject,or,nominally,withthenegationofit。Thusitisatthesametimetheantecedentstage,consciousness:itisthecontradictionofitselfasself—consciousnessandasconsciousness。ButthelatteraspectandthenegationingeneralisinI=Ipotentiallysuppressed;

  andhenceasthiscertitudeofselfagainsttheobjectitistheimpulsetorealizeitsimplicitnature,bygivingitsabstractself—awarenesscontentandobjectivity,andintheotherdirectiontofreeitselffromitssensuousness,tosetasidethegivenobjectivityandidentifyitwithitself。Thetwoprocessesareoneandthesame,theidentificationofitsconsciousnessandself—consciousness。

  i。AppetiteorInstinctiveDesire§426。

  Self—consciousness,initsimmediacy,isasingular,andadesire(appetite)—thecontradictionimpliedinitsabstractionwhichshouldyetbeobjective—orinitsimmediacywhichhastheshapeofanexternalobjectandshouldbesubjective。Thecertitudeofone’sself,whichissuesfromthesuppressionofmereconsciousness,pronouncestheobjectnull:andtheoutlookofself—consciousnesstowardstheobjectequallyqualifiestheabstractidealityofsuchself—consciousnessasnull。

  §427。

  Self—consciousness,therefore,knowsitselfimplicitintheobject,whichinthisoutlookisconformabletotheappetite。Inthenegationofthetwoone—sidedmomentsbytheego’sownactivity,thisidentitycomestobefortheego。Tothisactivitytheobject,whichimplicitlyandforself—consciousnessisself—less,canmakenoresistance:thedialectic,implicitinit,towardsself—suppressionexistsinthiscaseasthatactivityoftheego。Thuswhilethegivenobjectisrenderedsubjective,thesubjectivitydivestsitselfofitsone—sidednessandbecomesobjectivetoitself。

  §428。

  Theproductofthisprocessisthefastconjunctionoftheegowithitself,itssatisfactionrealized,anditselfmadeactual。Ontheexternalsideitcontinues,inthisreturnuponitself,primarilydescribableasanindividual,andmaintainsitselfassuch;becauseitsbearingupontheself—lessobjectispurelynegative,thelatter,therefore,beingmerelyconsumed。Thusappetiteinitssatisfactionisalwaysdestructive,andinitscontentselfish:andasthesatisfactionhasonlyhappenedintheindividual(andthatistransient)theappetiteisagaingeneratedintheveryactofsatisfaction。

  §429。

  Butontheinnerside,orimplicitly,thesenseofselfwhichtheegogetsinthesatisfactiondoesnotremaininabstractself—concentrationorinmereindividuality;onthecontrary—asnegationofimmediacyandindividualitytheresultinvolvesacharacterofuniversalityandoftheidentityofself—consciousnesswithitsobject。Thejudgementordiremptionofthisself—consciousnessistheconsciousnessofa’free’object,inwhichegoisawareofitselfasanego,whichhoweverisalsostilloutsideit。

  ii。Self—consciousnessRecognitive§430。

  Herethereisaself—consciousnessforaself—consciousness,atfirstimmediately,asoneoftwothingsforanother。InthatotherasegoIbeholdmyself,andyetalsoanimmediatelyexistingobject,anotheregoabsolutelyindependentofmeandopposedtome。(Thesuppressionofthesinglenessofself—consciousnesswasonlyafirststepinthesuppression,anditmerelyledtothecharacterizationofitasparticular。)Thiscontradictiongiveseitherself—consciousnesstheimpulsetoshowitselfasafreeself,andtoexistassuchfortheother:—theprocessofrecognition。

  §431。

  Theprocessisabattle。Icannotbeawareofmeasmyselfinanotherindividual,solongasIseeinthatotheranotherandanimmediateexistence:andIamconsequentlybentuponthesuppressionofthisimmediacyofhis。ButinlikemeasureIcannotberecognizedasimmediate,exceptsofarasIovercomethemereimmediacyonmyownpart,andthusgiveexistencetomyfreedom。Butthisimmediacyisatthesametimethecorporeityofself—consciousness,inwhichasinitssignandtoolthelatterhasitsownsenseofself,anditsbeingforothers,andthemeansforenteringintorelationwiththem。

  §432。

  Thefightofrecognitionisalifeanddeathstruggle:eitherself—consciousnessimperilstheother’slife,andincursalikeperilforitsown—butonlyperil,foreitherisnolessbentonmaintaininghislife,astheexistenceofhisfreedom。Thusthedeathofone,thoughbytheabstract,thereforerude,negationofimmediacy,it,fromonepointofview,solvesthecontradiction,isyet,fromtheessentialpointofview(i。e。theoutwardandvisiblerecognition),anewcontradiction(forthatrecognitionisatthesametimeundonebytheother’sdeath)andagreaterthantheother。

  §433。

  Butbecauselifeisasrequisiteaslibertytothesolution,thefightendsinthefirstinstanceasaone—sidednegationwithinequality。Whiletheonecombatantpreferslife,retainshissingleself—consciousness,butsurrendershisclaimforrecognition,theotherholdsfasttohisself—assertionandisrecognizedbytheformerashissuperior。Thusarisesthestatusofmasterandslave。

  Inthebattleforrecognitionandthesubjugationunderamaster,wesee,ontheirphenomenalside,theemergenceofman’ssociallifeandthecommencementofpoliticalunion。Force,whichisthebasisofthisphenomenon,isnotonthataccountabasisofright,butonlythenecessaryandlegitimatefactorinthepassagefromthestateofself—consciousnesssunkinappetiteandselfishisolationintothestateofuniversalself—consciousness。Force,then,istheexternalorphenomenalcommencementofstates,nottheirunderlyingandessentialprinciple。

  §434。

  Thisstatus,inthefirstplace,impliescommonwantsandcommonconcernfortheirsatisfaction—

  forthemeansofmastery,theslave,mustlikewisebekeptinlife。Inplaceoftherudedestructionoftheimmediateobjectthereensuesacquisition,preservation,andformationofit,astheinstrumentalityinwhichthetwoextremesofindependenceandnon—independenceareweldedtogether。Theformofuniversalitythusarisinginsatisfyingthewant,createsapermanentmeansandaprovisionwhichtakescareforandsecuresthefuture。

  §435。

  Butsecondly,whenwelooktothedistinctionofthetwo,themasterbeholdsintheslaveandhisservitudethesupremacyofhissingleself—hoodresultingfromthesuppressionofimmediateself—hood,asuppression,however,whichfallsonanother。Thisother,theslave,however,intheserviceofthemaster,worksoffhisindividualistself—will,overcomestheinnerimmediacyofappetite,andinthisdivestmentofselfandin’thefearofhislord’makes’thebeginningofwisdom’

  —thepassagetouniversalself—consciousness。

  iii。UniversalSelf—consciousness§436。

  Universalself—consciousnessistheaffirmativeawarenessofselfinanotherself:eachselfasafreeindividualityhashisown’absolute’independence,yetinvirtueofthenegationofitsimmediacyorappetitewithoutdistinguishingitselffromthatother。Eachisthusuniversalself—consciousnessandobjective;eachhas’real’universalityintheshapeofreciprocity,sofaraseachknowsitselfrecognizedintheotherfreeman,andisawareofthisinsofarasitrecognizestheotherandknowshimtobefree。

  Thisuniversalreappearanceofself—consciousness—thenotionwhichisawareofitselfinitsobjectivityasasubjectivityidenticalwithitselfandforthatreasonuniversal—istheformofconsciousnesswhichliesattherootofalltruementalorspirituallife—infamily,fatherland,state,andofallvirtues,love,friendship,valour,honour,fame。Butthisappearanceoftheunderlyingessencemayalsobeseveredfromthatessence,andbemaintainedapartinworthlesshonour,idlefame,etc。

  §437。

  Thisunityofconsciousnessandself—consciousnessimpliesinthefirstinstancetheindividualsmutuallythrowinglightuponeachother。Butthedifferencebetweenthosewhoarethusidentifiedismerevaguediversity—orratheritisadifferencewhichisnone。Henceitstruthisthefullyandreallyexistentuniversalityandobjectivityofself—consciousness—whichisReason。

  Reason,astheIdea(§213)asithereappears,istobetakenasmeaningthatthedistinctionbetweennotionandrealitywhichitunifieshasthespecialaspectofadistinctionbetweentheself—concentratednotionorconsciousness,andtheobjectsubsistingexternalandopposedtoit。

  (c)REASON

  §438。

  Theessentialandactualtruthwhichreasonis,liesinthesimpleidentityofthesubjectivityofthenotionwithitsobjectivityanduniversality。Theuniversalityofreason,therefore,whilstitsignifiesthattheobject,whichwasonlygiveninconsciousnessquaconsciousness,isnowitselfuniversal,permeatingandencompassingtheego,alsosignifiesthatthepureegoisthepureformwhichoverlapstheobjectandencompassesit。

  §439。

  Self—consciousness,thuscertifiedthatitsdeterminationsarenolessobjective,ordeterminationsoftheverybeingofthings,thantheyareitsownthoughts,isReason,whichassuchanidentityisnotonlytheabsolutesubstance,butthetruththatknowsit。Fortruthherehas,asitspeculiarmodeandimmanentform,theself—centredpurenotion,ego,thecertitudeofselfasinfiniteuniversality。

  Truth,awareofwhatitis,ismind(spirit)。

  440。

  C。PSYCHOLOGY

  MIND

  (a)TheoreticalMind—(b)PracticalMind—(c)FreeMindMindhasdefineditselfasthetruthofsoulandconsciousness—theformerasimpleimmediatetotality,thelatternowaninfiniteformwhichisnot,likeconsciousness,restrictedbythatcontent,anddoesnotstandinmerecorrelationtoitastoitsobject,butisanawarenessofthissubstantialtotality,neithersubjectivenorobjective。Mind,therefore,startsonlyfromitsownbeingandisincorrelationonlywithitsownfeatures。

  Psychologyaccordinglystudiesthefacultiesorgeneralmodesofmentalactivityquamental—

  mentalvision,ideation,remembering,etc。,desires,etc。—apartbothfromthecontent,whichonthephenomenalsideisfoundinempiricalideation,inthinkingalsoandindesireandwill,andfromthetwoformsinwhichthesemodesexist,viz。inthesoulasaphysicalmode,andinconsciousnessitselfasaseparatelyexistentobjectofthatconsciousness。This,however,isnotanarbitraryabstractionbythepsychologist。Mindisjustthiselevationabovenatureandphysicalmodes,andabovethecomplicationwithanexternalobject—inoneword,abovethematerial,asitsconcepthasjustshown。Allithasnowtodoistorealisethisnotionofitsfreedom,andgetridoftheformofimmediacywithwhichitoncemorebegins。Thecontentwhichiselevatedtointuitionsisitssensations:itisitsintuitionsalsowhicharetransmutedintorepresentations,anditsrepresentationswhicharetransmutedagainintothoughts,etc。

  §441。

  Thesoulisfinite,sofarasitsfeaturesareimmediateorconnatural。Consciousnessisfinite,insofarasithasanobject。Mindisfinite,insofaras,thoughitnolongerhasanobject,ithasamodeinitsknowledge;i。e。itisfinitebymeansofitsimmediacy,or,whatisthesamething,bybeingsubjectiveoronlyanotion。Anditisamatterofnoconsequence,whichisdefinedasitsnotion,andwhichastherealityofthatnotion。Saythatitsnotionistheutterlyinfiniteobjectivereason,thenitsrealityisknowledgeorintelligence:saythatknowledgeisitsnotion,thenitsrealityisthatreason,andtherealisationofknowledgeconsistsinappropriatingreason。Hencethefinitudeofmindistobeplacedinthe(temporary)failureofknowledgetogetholdofthefullrealityofitsreason,or,equally,inthe(temporary)failureofreasontoattainfullmanifestationinknowledge。

  Reasonatthesametimeisonlyinfinitesofarasitis’absolute’freedom;sofar,thatis,aspresupposingitselfforitsknowledgetoworkupon,ittherebyreducesitselftofinitude,andappearsaseverlastingmovementofsupersedingthisimmediacy,ofcomprehendingitself,andbeingarationalknowledge。

  §442。

  Theprogressofmindisdevelopment,insofarasitsexistentphase,viz。knowledge,involvesasitsintrinsicpurposeandburdenthatutterandcompleteautonomywhichisrationality;inwhichcasetheactionoftranslatingthispurposeintorealityisstrictlyonlyanominalpassageoverintomanifestation,andiseventhereareturnintoitself。Sofarasknowledgewhichhasnotshakenoffitsoriginalqualityofmereknowledgeisonlyabstractorformal,thegoalofmindistogiveitobjectivefulfilment,andthusatthesametimeproduceitsfreedom。

  Thedevelopmentheremeantisnotthatoftheindividual(whichhasacertainanthropologicalcharacter),wherefacultiesandforcesareregardedassuccessivelyemergingandpresentingthemselvesinexternalexistencesseriesofsteps,ontheascertainmentofwhichtherewasforalongtimegreatstresslaid(bythesystemofCondillac),asifaconjecturalnaturalemergencecouldexhibittheoriginofthesefacultiesandexplainthem。InCondillac’smethodthereisanunmistakableintentiontoshowhowtheseveralmodesofmentalactivitycouldbemadeintelligiblewithoutlosingsightofmentalunity,andtoexhibittheirnecessaryinterconnection。Butthecategoriesemployedindoingsoareofawretchedsort。Theirrulingprincipleisthatthesensibleistaken(andwithjustice)asthepriusortheinitialbasis,butthatthelatterphasesthatfollowthisstarting—pointpresentthemselvesasemerginginasolelyaffirmativemanner,andthenegativeaspectofmentalactivity,bywhichthismaterialistransmutedintomindanddestroyedasasensible,ismisconceivedandoverlooked。AsthetheoryofCondillacstatesit,thesensibleisnotmerelytheempiricalfirst,butisleftasifitwerethetrueandessentialfoundation。

  Similarly,iftheactivitiesofmindaretreatedasmeremanifestations,forces,perhapsintermsstatingtheirutilityorsuitabilityforsomeotherinterestofheadorheart,thereisnoindicationofthetruefinalaimofthewholebusiness。Thatcanonlybetheintelligibleunityofmind,anditsactivitycanonlyhaveitselfasaim;i。e。itsaimcanonlybetogetridoftheformofimmediacyorsubjectivity,toreachandgetholdofitself,andtoliberateitselftoitself。Inthiswaytheso—calledfacultiesofmindasthusdistinguishedareonlytobetreatedasstepsofthisliberation。Andthisistheonlyrationalmodeofstudyingthemindanditsvariousactivities。

  §443。

  Asconsciousnesshasforitsobjectthestagewhichprecededit,viz。thenaturalsoul(§413),somindhasorrathermakesconsciousnessitsobject:i。e。whereasconsciousnessisonlythevirtualidentityoftheegowithitsother(§415),themindrealisesthatidentityastheconcreteunitywhichitanditonlyknows。Itsproductionsaregovernedbytheprincipleofallreasonthatthecontentsareatoncepotentiallyexistent,andarethemind’sown,infreedom。Thus,ifweconsidertheinitialaspectofmind,thataspectistwofold—asbeingandasitsown:bytheone,themindfindsinitselfsomethingwhichis,bytheotheritaffirmsittobeonlyitsown。Thewayofmindistherefore(a)tobetheoretical:ithastodowiththerationalasitsimmediateaffectionwhichitmustrenderitsown:orithastofreeknowledgefromitspresupposednessandthereforefromitsabstractness,andmaketheaffectionsubjective。Whentheaffectionhasbeenrendereditsown,andtheknowledgeconsequentlycharacterisedasfreeintelligence,i。e。ashavingitsfullandfreecharacterisationinitself,itis(b)Will:practicalmind,whichinthefirstplaceislikewiseformal—i。e。itscontentisatfirstonlyitsown,andisimmediatelywilled;anditproceedsnexttoliberateitsvolitionfromitssubjectivity,whichistheone—sidedformofitscontents,sothatit(c)confrontsitselfasfreemindandthusgetsridofbothitsdefectsofone—sidedness。

  §444。

  ThetheoreticalaswellasthepracticalmindstillfallunderthegeneralrangeofMindSubjective。

  Theyarenottobedistinguishedasactiveandpassive。Subjectivemindisproductive:butitisamerelynominalproductivity。Inwards,thetheoreticalmindproducesonlyits’ideal’world,andgainsabstractautonomywithin;whilethepractical,whileithastodowithautonomousproducts,withamaterialwhichisitsown,hasamaterialwhichisonlynominallysuch,andthereforearestrictedcontent,forwhichitgainstheformofuniversality。Outwards,thesubjectivemind(whichasaunityofsoulandconsciousness,isthusalsoareality—arealityatonceanthropologicalandconformabletoconsciousness)hasforitsproducts,inthetheoreticalrange,theword,andinthepractical(notyetdeedandaction,but)enjoyment。

  Psychology,likelogic,isoneofthosescienceswhichinmoderntimeshaveyetderivedleastprofitfromthemoregeneralmentalcultureandthedeeperconceptionofreason。Itisstillextremelyilloff。TheturnwhichtheKantianphilosophyhastakenhasgivenitgreaterimportance:ithas,andthatinitsempiricalcondition,beenclaimedasthebasisofmetaphysics,whichistoconsistofnothingbuttheempiricalapprehensionandtheanalysisofthefactsofhumanconsciousness,merelyasfacts,justastheyaregiven。Thispositionofpsychology,mixingitupwithformsbelongingtotherangeofconsciousnessandwithanthropology,hasledtonoimprovementinitsowncondition:butithashadthefurthereffectthat,bothforthemindassuch,andformetaphysicsandphilosophygenerally,allattemptshavebeenabandonedtoascertainthenecessityofessentialandactualreality,togetatthenotionandthetruth。

  (a)THEORETICALMIND

  §445。

  iIntuition—iiRepresentation—iiiThinkingIntelligencefindsitselfdetermined:thisisitsapparentaspectfromwhichinitsimmediacyitstarts。

  Butasknowledge,intelligenceconsistsintreatingwhatisfoundasitsown。Itsactivityhastodowiththeemptyform—thepretenseoffindingreason:anditsaimistorealiseitsconceptortobereasonactual,alongwithwhichthecontentisrealisedasrational。Thisactivityiscognition。Thenominalknowledge,whichisonlycertitude,elevatesitself,asreasonisconcrete,todefiniteandconceptualknowledge。Thecourseofthiselevationisitselfrational,andconsistsinanecessarypassage(governedbytheconcept)ofonegradeortermofintelligentactivity(aso—calledfacultyofmind)intoanother。Therefutationwhichsuchcognitiongivesofthesemblancethattherationalisfound,startsfromthecertitudeorthefaithofintelligenceinitscapabilityofrationalknowledge,andinthepossibilityofbeingabletoappropriatethereason,whichitandthecontentvirtuallyis。

  ThedistinctionofIntelligencefromWillisoftenincorrectlytakentomeanthateachhasafixedandseparateexistenceofitsown,asifvolitioncouldbewithoutintelligence,ortheactivityofintelligencecouldbewithoutwill。Thepossibilityofacultureoftheintellectwhichleavestheheartuntouched,asitissaid,andoftheheartwithouttheintellect—ofheartswhichinone—sidedwaywantintellect,andheartlessintellects—onlyprovesatmostthatbadandradicallyuntrueexistencesoccur。Butitisnotphilosophywhichshouldtakesuchuntruthsofexistenceandofmereimaginingfortruth—taketheworthlessfortheessentialnature。Ahostofotherphrasesusedofintelligence,e。g。thatitreceivesandacceptsimpressionsfromoutside,thatideasarisethroughthecausaloperationsofexternalthingsuponit,etc。,belongtoapointofviewutterlyalientothementallevelortothepositionofphilosophicstudy。

  Afavoritereflectionalformisthatofpowersandfacultiesofsoul,intelligence,ormind。Faculty,likepowerorforce,isthefixedqualityofanyobjectofthought,conceivedasreflectedintoself。

  Force(§136)isnodoubttheinfinityofform—oftheinwardandtheoutward:butitsessentialfinitudeinvolvestheindifferenceofcontenttoform(ib。note)。Inthisliesthewantoforganicunitywhichbythisreflectionalform,treatingmindasa’lot’offorces,isbroughtintomind,asitisbythesamemethodbroughtintonature。Anyaspectwhichcanbedistinguishedinmentalactionisstereotypedasanindependententity,andthemindthusmadeaskeleton—likemechanicalcollection。Itmakesabsolutelynodifferenceifwesubstitutetheexpression’activities’forpowersandfaculties。Isolatetheactivitiesandyousimilarlymakethemindamereaggregate,andtreattheiressentialcorrelationasanexternalincident。

  Theactionofintelligenceastheoreticalmindhasbeencalledcognition(knowledge)。Yetthisdoesnotmeanintelligenceinteraliaknows—besideswhichitalsointuits,conceives,remembers,imagines,etc。Totakeupsuchapositionisinthefirstinstance,partandparcelofthatisolatingofmentalactivityjustcensured;butitisalsoinadditionconnectedwiththegreatquestionofmoderntimes,astowhethertrueknowledgeortheknowledgeoftruthispossible—which,ifansweredinthenegative,mustleadtoabandoningtheeffort。Thenumerousaspectsandreasonsandmodesofphrasewithwhichexternalreflectionswellsthebulkofthisquestionareclearedupintheirplace:

  themoreexternaltheattitudeofunderstandinginthequestion,themorediffuseitmakesitssimpleobject。Atthepresentplacethesimpleconceptofcognitioniswhatconfrontsthequitegeneralassumptiontakenupbythequestion,viz。theassumptionthatthepossibilityoftrueknowledgeingeneralisindispute,andtheassumptionthatitispossibleforusatourwilleithertoprosecuteortoabandoncognition。Theconceptorpossibilityofcognitionhascomeoutasintelligenceitself,asthecertitudeofreason:theactofcognitionitselfisthereforetheactualityofintelligence。Itfollowsfromthisthatitisabsurdtospeakofintelligenceandyetatthesametimeofthepossibilityorchoiceofknowingornot。Butcognitionisgenuine,justsofarasitrealisesitself,ormakestheconceptitsown。Thisnominaldescriptionhasitsconcretemeaningexactlywherecognitionhasit。

  Thestagesofitsrealisingactivityareintuition,conception,memory,etc。:theseactivitieshavenootherimmanentmeaning:theiraimissolelytheconceptofcognition(§445note)。Iftheyareisolated,however,thenanimpressionisimpliedthattheyareusefulforsomethingelsethancognition,orthattheyseverallyprocureacognitivesatisfactionoftheirown;andthatleadstoaglorificationofthedelightsofintuition,remembrance,imagination。Itistruethatevenasisolated(i。e。asnon—intelligent),intuition,imagination,etc。canaffordacertainsatisfaction:whatphysicalnaturesucceedsindoingbyitsfundamentalquality—itsout—of—selfness—exhibitingtheelementsorfactorsofimmanentreasonexternaltoeachother—thattheintelligencecandobyvoluntaryact,butthesameresultmayhappenwheretheintelligenceisitselfonlynaturalanduntrained。Butthetruesatisfaction,itisadmitted,isonlyaffordedbyanintuitionpermeatedbyintellectandmind,byrationalconception,byproductsofimaginationwhicharepermeatedbyreasonandexhibitideas—inaword,bycognitiveintuition,cognitiveconception,etc。Thetruthascribedtosuchsatisfactionliesinthis,thatintuition,conception,etc。arenotisolated,andexistonlyas’moments’

  inthetotalityofcognitionitself。

  i。Intuition(IntelligentPerception)

  §446。

  Themindwhichassoulisphysicallyconditioned—whichasconsciousnessstandstothisconditiononthesametermsastoanoutwardobject—butwhichasintelligencefindsitselfsocharacterised—is(1)aninarticulateembryoniclife,inwhichitistoitselfasitwerepalpableandhasthewholematerialofitsknowledge。Inconsequenceoftheimmediacyinwhichitisthusoriginally,itisinthisstageonlyasanindividualandpossessesavulgarsubjectivity。Itthusappearsasmindintheguiseoffeeling。

  Iffeelingformerlyturnedup(§399)asamodeofthesoul’sexistence,thefindingofitoritsimmediacywasinthatcaseessentiallytobeconceivedasacongenitalorcorporealcondition;

  whereasatpresentitisonlytobetakenabstractlyinthegeneralsenseofimmediacy。

  §447。

  Thecharacteristicformoffeelingisthatthoughitisamodeofsome’affection’,thismodeissimple。

  Hencefeeling,evenshoulditsimportbemoststerlingandtrue,hastheformofcasualparticularity—nottomentionthatitsimportmayalsobethemostscantyandmostuntrue。

  Itiscommonlyenoughassumedthatmindhasinitsfeelingthematerialofitsideas,butthestatementismoreusuallyunderstoodinasensetheoppositeofthatwhichithashere。Incontrastwiththesimplicityoffeelingitisusualrathertoassumethattheprimarymentalphaseisjudgementgenerally,orthedistinctionofconsciousnessintosubjectandobject;andthespecialqualityofsensationisderivedfromanindependentobject,externalorinternal。Withus,inthetruthofmind,themereconsciousnesspointofview,asopposedtotruemental’idealism’,isswallowedup,andthematteroffeelinghasratherbeensupposedalreadyasimmanentinthemind。—Itiscommonlytakenforgrantedthatasregardscontentthereismoreinfeelingthaninthought:thisbeingspeciallyaffirmedofmoralandreligiousfeelings。Nowthematerial,whichthemindasitfeelsistoitself,isheretheresultandthematureresultofafullyorganisedreason。henceundertheheadoffeelingiscomprisedallrationalandindeedallspiritualcontentwhatever。Buttheformofselfishsinglenesstowhichfeelingreducesthemindisthelowestandworstvehicleitcanhave—oneinwhichitisnotfoundasafreeandinfinitelyuniversalprinciple,butratherassubjectiveandprivate,incontentandvalueentirelycontingent。Trainedandsterlingfeelingisthefeelingofaneducatedmindwhichhasacquiredtheconsciousnessofthetruedifferencesofthings,oftheiressentialrelationshipsandrealcharacters;anditiswithsuchamindthatthisrectifiedmaterialentersintoitsfeelingandreceivesthisform。Feelingistheimmediate,asitweretheclosest,contactinwhichthethinkingsubjectcanstandtoagivencontent。Againstthatcontentthesubjectreactsfirstofallwithitsparticularself—feeling,whichthoughitmaybeofmoresterlingvalueandofwiderrangethanaone—sidedintellectualstandpoint,mayjustaslikelybenarrowandpoor;andinanycaseistheformoftheparticularandsubjective。Ifamanonanytopicappealsnottothenatureandnotionofthething,oratleasttoreasons—tothegeneralitiesofcommonsense—buttohisfeeling,theonlythingtodoistolethimalone,becausebyhisbehaviourherefusestohaveanylotorpartincommonrationality,andshutshimselfupinhisownisolatedsubjectivity—hisprivateandparticularself。

  §448。

  (2)Asthisimmediatefindingisbrokenupintoelements,wehavetheonefactorinAttention—theabstractidenticaldirectionofmind(infeeling,asalsoinallothermoreadvanceddevelopmentsofit)—anactiveself—collection—thefactoroffixingitasourown,butwithanasyetonlynominalautonomyofintelligence。Apartfromsuchattentionthereisnothingforthemind。Theotherfactoristoinvestthespecialqualityoffeeling,ascontrastedwiththisinwardnessofmind,withthecharacterofsomethingexistent,butasanegativeorastheabstractothernessofitself。Intelligencethusdefinesthecontentofsensationassomethingthatisoutofitself,projectsitintotimeandspace,whicharetheformsinwhichitisintuitive。Totheviewofconsciousnessthematerialisonlyanobjectofconsciousness,arelativeother:fromminditreceivestherationalcharacteristicofbeingitsveryother(§§247,254)。

点击下载App,搜索"Philosophy of Spirit",免费读到尾