第7章
加入书架 A- A+
点击下载App,搜索"Essays in Little",免费读到尾

  ItwasnotaltogetherahappytimethatLeverpassedathome.Notonlydidhisnativecriticsbelabourhimmostungrudginglyfor\"TomBurke,\"thatvividandchivalrousromance,buthemadeenemiesofauthors.Heeditedamagazine!Isnotthatenough?Heweariedofwadingthroughwaggon—loadsofthatpureunmitigatedrubbishwhichpeoplearepermittedto\"shoot\"ateditorialdoors.Howmuchdustthereisinittohowfewpearls!HedidnotreturnMSS.punctuallyandpolitely.Theofficecatcouldeditthevolunteeredcontributionsofmanyamagazine,butLeverwasevenmorecasualandcarelessthananexperiencedofficecat.Hegrewcrabbed,andtriedtoquarrelwithMr.Thackerayforthatdelightfulparody\"PhilFogarty,\"nearlyasgoodasagenuinestorybyLever.

  Besetbycritics,burlesquedbyhisfriend,hechangedhisstyle(Mr.Fitzpatricktellsus)andbecamemoresober——andnotsoentertaining.HeactuallypublishedacriticismofBeyle,ofStendhal,thatpsychologicalprig,thedarlingofcultureandofM.

  PaulBourget.HarryLorrequeronStendhal!——itbeggarsbelief.HenearlyfoughtaduelwiththegentlemanwhoissaidtohavesuggestedMr.PecksnifftoDickens!Yettheycallhisearlynovelsimprobable.NothingcouldbelessplausiblethanacombatbetweenHarryLorrequerandagentlemanwho,evenremotely,resembledthefatherofCherryandMerry.

  Leverwentabroadagain,andinFlorenceortheBathsofLucca,inTriesteorSpezia,hepassedtherestofhislife.HesawtheItalianrevolutionof1848,anditaddedtohismelancholy.Thisisplainfromoneofhisnovelswithacurioushistory——\"ConCregan.\"

  Hewroteitatthesametimeas\"TheDaltons,\"andhedidnotsignit.Thereviewerspraised\"ConCregan\"attheexpenseofthesignedwork,rejoicingthatLever,as\"TheDaltons\"proved,wasexhausted,andthatanewIrishauthor,theauthorof\"ConCregan,\"wascomingtoeclipsehim.Inshort,heeclipsedhimself,andhedidnotlikeit.Hisrighthandwasjealousofwhathislefthanddid.Itseemsoddthatanyhumanbeing,howeverdullandenvious,failedtodetectLeverintherapidandvivaciousadventuresofhisIrish\"GilBlas,\"

  heroofoneoftheverybestamonghisbooks,apiecenotunworthyofDumas.\"Con\"waswrittenaftermidnight,\"TheDaltons\"inthemorning;andtherecanbenodoubtwhichsetofhourswasmorefavourabletoLever’sgenius.Ofcourseheliked\"TheDaltons\"

  best;ofallpeople,authorsappeartobetheirownworstcritics.

  ItisnotpossibleeventocatalogueLever’slaterbookshere.

  Againhedroveapairofnovelsabreast——\"TheDodds\"and\"SirJasperCarew\"——whichcontainsomeofhismostpowerfulsituations.Whenalmostanoldman,sad,outworninbody,straitenedincircumstances,hestillproducedexcellenttalesinthislatermanner——\"LordKilgobbin,\"\"ThatBoyofNorcott’s,\"\"ADay’sRide,\"

  andmanymore.Thesearethethoughtsofatiredmanoftheworld,whohasdoneandseeneverythingthatsuchmenseeanddo.Hesaysthathegrewfat,andbald,andgrave;hewroteforthegraveandthebald,notforthehappierworldwhichisyoung,andcurly,andmerry.Hediedatlast,itissaid,inhissleep;anditisaddedthathedidwhatHarryLorrequerwouldnothavedone——helefthisaffairsinperfectorder.

  Leverlivedinanagesofullofgreatnoveliststhat,perhaps,heisnotprizedasheshouldbe.Dickens,Bulwer,Thackeray,Trollope,GeorgeEliot,werehiscontemporaries.Butwhenweturnbackandreadhimoncemore,weseethatLever,too,wasaworthymemberofthatfamouscompany——aromancerforboysandmen.

  THEPOEMSOFSIRWALTERSCOTT

  Yesterday,asthesunwasverybright,andtherewasnowind,Itookafishing—rodonchanceandScott’spoems,androwedintothemiddleofSt.Mary’sLoch.Everyhill,everytuftofheatherwasreflectedinthelake,asinasilvermirror.Therewasnosoundbutthelappingofthewateragainsttheboat,thecryoftheblackcockfromthehill,andthepleasantplashofatroutrisinghereandthere.

  SoIread\"TheLayoftheLastMinstrel\"overagain,here,inthemiddleofthesceneswherethestoryislaidandwherethefightswerefought.ForwhentheBaronwentonpilgrimage,\"AndtookwithhimthiselvishpageToMary’sChapeloftheLowes,\"

  itwastotheruinedchapelHEREthathecame,\"Forthere,besideourLadye’slake,Anofferinghehadsworntomake,Andhewouldpayhisvows.\"

  Buthisenemy,theLadyofBranksome,gatheredaband,\"Ofthebestthatwouldrideathercommand,\"

  andtheyallcamefromthecountryround.Branksome,wheretheladylived,istwentymilesoff,towardsthesouth,acrosstherangesoflonelygreenhills.Harden,whereherally,WatofHarden,abode,iswithintwelvemiles;andDeloraine,whereWilliamdwelt,isnearerstill;andJohnofThirlestanehadhissquaretowerintheheather,\"wherevictualnevergrew,\"onEttrickWater,withintenmiles.Thesegentlemen,andtheirkinsfolkandretainers,beingatfeudwiththeKers,triedtoslaytheBaron,intheChapelof\"LoneSt.MaryoftheWaves.\"

  \"Theywerethreehundredspearsandthree.

  ThroughDouglasburn,upYarrowstream,Theirhorsesprance,theirlancesgleam.

  TheycametoSt.Mary’sLakeereday;

  Butthechapelwasvoid,andtheBaronaway.

  Theyburnedthechapelforveryrage,AndcursedLordCranstoun’sgoblin—page.\"

  TheScottswerearoughclanenoughtoburnaholychapelbecausetheyfailedtokilltheirenemywithinthesacredwalls.But,asI

  readagain,forthetwentiethtime,SirWalter’spoem,floatingonthelonelybreastofthelake,intheheartofthehillswhereYarrowflows,amongthelittlegreenmoundsthatcovertheruinsofchapelandcastleandlady’sbower,IaskedmyselfwhetherSirWalterwasindeedagreatanddelightfulpoet,orwhetherhepleasesmesomuchbecauseIwasborninhisowncountry,andhaveonedropofthebloodofhisBorderrobbersinmyownveins?

  Itisnotalwayspleasanttogobacktoplaces,ortomeetpeople,whomwehavelovedwell,longago.Iftheyhavechangedlittle,wehavechangedmuch.Thelittleboy,whosefirstbookofpoetrywas\"TheLadyoftheLake,\"andwhonaturallybelievedthattherewasnopoetlikeSirWalter,issadlychangedintothemanwhohasreadmostoftheworld’spoets,andwhohears,onmanysides,thatScottisoutwornanddoomedtodeservedoblivion.Aretheyrightorwrong,thecriticswhotellus,occasionally,thatScott’sgoodnovelsmakeupforhisbadverse,orthatverseandprose,allmustgo?Procaptulectoris,bythereader’staste,theystandorfall;

  yetevenpessimismcanscarcelybelievethattheWaverleyNovelsaremortal.Theywereoncethejoyofeveryclassofminds;theycannotceasetobethejoyofthosewhoclingtothepermanentlygood,andcanunderstandandforgivelapses,carelessnesses,andtheleisurelyliteraryfashionofaformerage.But,astothepoems,manygivethemupwhoclingtothenovels.Itdoesnotfollowthatthepoemsarebad.Inthefirstplace,theyareoftwokinds——lyricandnarrative.Now,thefashionofnarrativeinpoetryhaspassedawayforthepresent.ThetrueGreekepicsarereadbyafewinGreek;

  byperhapsfewerstillintranslations.Butsodeterminedarewenottoreadtalesinverse,thatproserenderings,evenoftheepics,nay,evenoftheAtticdramas,havecomemoreorlessintovogue.ThisaccountsforthecomparativeneglectofSirWalter’slays.TheyarespokenofasWaverleyNovelsspoiled.Thismustalwaysbetheopinionofreaderswhowillnotsubmittostoriesinverse;itbynomeansfollowsthattheverseisbad.Ifwemakeanexception,whichwemust,infavourofChaucer,whereistherebetterverseinstorytellinginthewholeofEnglishliterature?

  Thereaderswhodespise\"Marmion,\"or\"TheLadyoftheLake,\"dosobecausetheydislikestoriestoldinpoetry.Frompoetrytheyexpectotherthings,especiallyalingeringcharmandmagicofstyle,areflectiveturn,\"criticismoflife.\"Thesethings,exceptsofaraslifecanbecriticisedinaction,arealientotheMuseofnarrative.Storiesandpicturesareallsheoffers:Scott’spictures,certainly,arefreshenough,histalesareexcellentenough,hismannerissufficientlydirect.Totakeexamples:everyonewhowantstoreadScott’spoetryshouldbeginwiththe\"Lay.\"

  Fromopeningtocloseitneverfalters:—

  \"NineandtwentyknightsoffameHungtheirshieldsinBranksomeHall;

  NineandtwentysquiresofnameBroughttheirsteedstobowerfromstall,NineandtwentyyeomentallWaited,duteous,onthemall

  Tenofthemweresheathedinsteel,Withbeltedsword,andspuronheel;

  TheyquittednottheirharnessbrightNeitherbydaynoryetbynight:

  TheylaydowntorestWithcorsletlaced,Pillowedonbucklercoldandhard;

  TheycarvedatthemealWithglovesofsteel,Andtheydranktheredwinethroughthehelmetbarred.\"

  Now,isnotthatabravebeginning?Doesnottheverseclankandchimelikeswordsheathonspur,likethebitsofchampinghorses?

  Then,whenWilliamofDeloraineissentonhislonelymidnightrideacrossthehauntedmoorsandwolds,doestheversenotgallopliketheheavyarmouredhorse?

  \"Unchallenged,thencepassedDeloraine,ToancientRiddell’sfairdomain,WhereAill,frommountainsfreed,Downfromthelakesdidravingcome;

  Eachwavewascrestedwithtawnyfoam,Likethemaneofachestnutsteed,Invain!notorrent,deeporbroad,Mightbartheboldmoss—trooper’sroad;

  Atthefirstplungethehorsesunklow,Andthewaterbrokeo’erthesaddle—bow.\"

  Theselasttwolineshavetheverymovementandnote,thedeepheavyplunge,thestillswirlofthewater.WellIknowthelochswhenceAillcomesredinflood;manyatrouthaveItakeninAill,longago.This,ofcourse,causesafavourableprejudice,apersonalbiastowardsadmiration.ButIthinkthepoetryitselfisgood,andstirsthespirit,evenofthosewhoknownotAilmoor,themotherofAill,thatliesdarkamongthemelancholyhills.

  ThespiritisstirredthroughoutbythechivalryandthecourageofScott’smenandofhiswomen.ThustheLadyofBranksomeaddressestheEnglishinvaderswhohavetakenherboyprisoner:—

  \"FortheyoungheirofBranksome’sline,Godbehisaid,andGodbemine;

  Throughmenofriendshallmeethisdoom;

  Here,whileIlive,nofoefindsroom.

  ThenifthyLordstheirpurposeurge,Takeourdefianceloudandhigh;

  Oursloganistheirlyke—wakedirge,Ourmoat,thegravewheretheyshalllie.\"

  Ay,andthoughtheminstrelsaysheisnolovepoet,andthough,indeed,heshinesmoreinwarthaninlady’sbower,isnotthisanoblestanzaontruelove,andworthyofwhatoldMalorywritesinhis\"Mortd’Arthur\"?BecausehereScottspeaksforhimself,andofhisownunhappyandimmortalaffection:—

  \"Truelove’sthegiftwhichGodhasgivenTomanalonebeneaththeHeaven.

  ItisnotFantasy’shotfire,Whosewishes,soonasgranted,fly;

  Itlivethnotinfiercedesire,Withdeaddesireitdocknotdie:

  Itisthesecretsympathy,Thesilverlink,thesilkentie,Whichhearttoheartandmindtomind,Inbodyandinsoulcanbind.\"

  Truthandfaith,courageandchivalry,afreelifeinthehillsandbythestreams,ashrewdbrain,anopenheart,akindwordforfriendorfoeman,thesearewhatyoulearnfromthe\"Lay,\"ifyouwanttolearnlessonsfrompoetry.Itisarudelegend,perhaps,asthecriticssaidatonce,whencriticsweredisdainfulofwizardpriestsandladiesmagical.Butitisadeathlesslegend,Ihope;

  itappealstoeveryyoungheartthatisnotearlyspoiledbylowcunning,andcynicism,andloveofgain.Theminstrel’sownprophecyistrue,andstill,andalways,\"Yarrow,asherollsalong,Bearsburdentotheminstrel’ssong.\"

  Afterthe\"Lay\"came\"Marmion,aTaleofFloddenField.\"Itisfarmoreambitiousandcomplicatedthanthe\"Lay,\"andisnotmuchworsewritten.SirWalterwaseverarapidandcarelesspoet,andashetookmorepainswithhisplot,hetooklesswithhisverse.Hisfriendsreprovedhim,butheansweredtooneofthem—

  \"SinceoftthyjudgmentcouldrefineMyflattenedthoughtandcumbrousline,Stillkind,asisthywont,attend,Andintheminstrelsparethefriend:

  Thoughwildascloud,asstream,asgale,Flowforth,flowunrestrained,mytale!\"

  AnyonewhoknowsScott’scountryknowshowcloudandstreamandgaleallsweepatoncedownthevalleyofEttrickorofTweed.Westwind,wildcloud,redriver,theypourforthasbyoneimpulse——

  forthfromthefar—offhills.Helethisversesweepoutinthesamestormysort,andmanya\"cumbrousline,\"manya\"flattenedthought,\"youmaynote,ifyouwill,in\"Marmion.\"Forexample—

  \"Andthinkwhathemustnexthavefelt,Atbucklingofthefalchionbelt.\"

  The\"Lay\"isatalethatonlyversecouldtell;muchof\"Marmion\"

  mighthavebeentoldinprose,andmostof\"Rokeby.\"ButprosecouldnevergivethepictureofEdinburgh,nortellthetaleofFloddenFightin\"Marmion,\"whichIverilybelieveisthebestbattle—pieceinallthepoetryofalltime,bettereventhanthestandofAiasbytheshipsintheIliad,betterthantheslayingoftheWooersintheOdyssey.Norcouldprosegiveusthehuntingofthedeerandthelonggallopoverhillsideanddownvalley,withwhichthe\"LadyoftheLake\"begins,openingtherebytheenchantedgatesoftheHighlandstotheworld.\"TheLadyoftheLake,\"exceptinthebattle—piece,istoldinalessrapidmetrethanthatofthe\"Lay,\"lessvariedthanthatof\"Marmion.\"\"Rokeby\"livesonlybyitssongs;the\"LordoftheIsles\"byBannockburn,the\"FieldofWaterloo\"bytherepulseoftheCuirassiers.Butallthepoemsareinterspersedwithsongsandballads,asthebeautifulballadof\"AliceBrand\";andScott’sfamerestsonTHESEfarmorethanonhislaterversifiedromances.Comingimmediatelyaftertheverytamestpoetswhoeverlived,likeHayley,Scottwrotesongsandballadsaswildandfree,asmelancholyorgay,asevershepherdsang,orgipsycarolled,orwitch—wifemoaned,oroldforgottenminstrellefttotheworld,musicwithnomaker’sname.Forexample,taketheOutlaw’srhyme—

  \"Withburnishedbrandandmusketoon,Sogallantlyyoucome,IreadyouforabolddragoonThatliststhetuckofdrum.

  Ilistnomorethetuckofdrum,Nomorethetrumpethear;

  Butwhenthebeetlesoundshishum,Mycomradestakethespear.

  And,oh,thoughBrignalbanksbefair,AndGretawoodsbegay,Yetmicklemustthemaidendare,WouldreignmyQueenofMay!\"

  Howmusical,again,isthis!—

  \"ThismornismerryJune,Itrow,Theroseisbuddingfain;

  Butsheshallbloominwintersnow,Erewetwomeetagain.

  Heturnedhischargerashespake,Upontherivershore,Hegavehisbridle—reinsashake,Said,’Adieuforevermore,Mylove!

  Adieuforevermore!’\"

  Turningfromthelegendsinverse,letitnotbeforgottenthatScottwasagreatlyricalpoet.Mr.Palgraveisnottoolenientajudge,andhis\"GoldenTreasury\"isatouchstone,aswellasatreasure,ofpoeticgold.InthisvolumeWordsworthcontributesmorelyricsthananyotherpoet:ShelleyandShakespearecomenext;

  thenSirWalter.FormypartIwouldgladlysacrificeafewofWordsworth’sforafewmoreofScott’s.Butthismaybeprejudice.

  Mr.Palgraveisnotprejudiced,andweseehowhighishisvalueforSirWalter.

  Therearescoresofsongsinhisworks,touchingandsad,orgayasahunter’swaking,thattelloflovelythingslostbytradition,andfoundbyhimonthemoors:allthese——notprizedbySirWalterhimself——areinhisgift,andinthatofnootherman.Forexample,his\"EveofSt.John\"issimplyamasterpiece,aballadamongballads.Nothingbutanoldsongmovesuslike—

  \"Arethesethelinkso’Forth,shesaid,Arethesethebendso’Dee!\"

  Hemighthavedonemoreofthebest,hadheverygreatlycared.

  Aloneamongpoets,hehadneithervanitynorjealousy;hethoughtlittleofhisownverseandhisownfame:wouldthathehadthoughtmore!wouldthathehadbeenmorecarefulofwhatwassoprecious!

  Butheturnedtoprose;badepoetryfarewell.

  \"Yet,onceagain,farewell,thouMinstrelHarp,Yet,onceagain,forgivemyfeeblesway.

  AndlittlereckIofthecensuresharpMayidlycavilatanidlelay.\"

  Peoplestillcavilidly,complainingthatScottdidnotfinish,ordidnotpolishhispieces;thathewasnotKeats,orwasnotWordsworth.Hewashimself;hewastheLastMinstrel,thelatest,thegreatest,thenoblestofnaturalpoetsconcernedwithnaturalthings.Hesangoffree,fierce,andwarlikelife,ofstreamsyetrichinsalmon,andmoorsnotyetoccupiedbybrewers;oflonelyplaceshauntedinthelonggreytwilightsoftheNorth;ofcrumblingtowerswhereoncedwelttheLadyofBranksomeortheFlowerofYarrow.Naturesummedupinhimmanyapastageaworldofancientfaiths;andbeforethegreattimeofBritainwhollydied,toBritain,astoGreece,shegaveherHomer.Whenhewasold,andtired,andnearhisdeath——sowornwithtroubleandlabourthatheactuallysignedhisownnamewrong——hewrotehislatestverse,foralady.Itends—

  \"Mycountry,bethougloriousstill!\"

  andsohedied,withinthesoundofthewhisperofTweed,foreseeingtheyearswhenhiscountrywouldnomorebeglorious,thinkingofhiscountryonly,forgettingquitetheprivatesorrowofhisownlaterdays.

  PeoplewilltellyouthatScottwasnotagreatpoet;thathisboltisshot,hisfameperishing.Littlehecaredforhisfame!ButformypartIthinkandhopethatScottcanneverdie,tillmengrowupintomanhoodwithouteverhavingbeenboys——tilltheyforgetthat\"OneglorioushourofcrowdedlifeIsworthanagewithoutaname!\"

  Thus,thechargesagainstSirWalter’spoetryare,onthewhole,littlemorethantheoldcriticalfallacyofblamingathingfornotbeingsomethingelse.\"Ittakesallsortstomakeaworld,\"inpoetryasinlife.SirWalter’ssortisaverygoodsort,andinEnglishliteratureitsplacewasempty,andwaitingforhim.Thinkofwhathedid.Englishpoetryhadlongbeenverytameandcommonplace,writtenincoupletslikePope’s,veryartificialandsmart,orsensibleandslow.Hecamewithpoemsofwhichthemusicseemedtogallop,likethunderinghoofsandringingbridlesofarushingbordertroop.Hereweregoblin,ghost,andfairy,fightandforay,fairladiesandtruelovers,gallantknightsandhardblows,blazingbeaconsoneveryhillcrestandonthebartisanofeverytower.Herewasaworldmadealiveagainthathadbeendeadforthreehundredyears——aworldofmenandwomen.

  Theysaythatthearchaeologyisnotgood.Archaeologyisascience;initsapplicationtopoetry,Scottwasitsdiscoverer.

  Otherscannametheplatesofacoatofarmourmorelearnedlythanhe,buthemademenwearthem.TheycallhisGothicartfalse,hisarmourpasteboard;butheputlivingmenunderhiscastledroofs,livingmenintohisbreastplatesandtaslets.Scienceadvances,oldknowledgebecomesignorance;itispoetrythatdoesnotdie,andthatwillnotdie,while—

  \"ThetripleprideOfEildonlooksoverStrathclyde.\"

  JOHNBUNYAN

  Dr.JohnsononcetookBishopPercy’slittledaughteronhisknee,andaskedherwhatshethoughtofthe\"Pilgrim’sProgress.\"Thechildansweredthatshehadnotreadit.\"No?\"repliedtheDoctor;

  \"thenIwouldnotgiveonefarthingforyou,\"andhesetherdownandtooknofurthernoticeofher.

  Thisstory,iftrue,provesthattheDoctorwasratherintolerant.

  Wemustnotexcommunicatepeoplebecausetheyhavenotourtasteinbooks.Themajorityofpeopledonotcareforbooksatall.

  ThereisadescendantofJohnBunyan’salivenow,ortherewaslately,whoneverreadthe\"Pilgrim’sProgress.\"Booksarenotinhisline.Nay,Bunyanhimself,whowrotesixtyworks,wasnogreatreader.AnOxfordscholarwhovisitedhiminhisstudyfoundnobooksatall,exceptsomeofBunyan’sownandFoxe’s\"BookofMartyrs.\"

  Yet,littleastheworldingeneralcaresforreading,ithasreadBunyanmorethanmost.Onehundredthousandcopiesofthe\"Pilgrim\"

  arebelievedtohavebeensoldinhisownday,andthestoryhasbeendoneintothemostsavagelanguages,aswellasintothoseofthecivilisedworld.

  Dr.Johnson,whodidnotlikeDissenters,praisesthe\"invention,imagination,andconductofthestory,\"andknewnootherbookhewishedlongerexcept\"RobinsonCrusoe\"and\"DonQuixote.\"Well,Dr.

  JohnsonwouldnothavegivenafarthingforME,asIamquitecontentedwiththepresentlengthofthesemasterpieces.WhatbooksdoYOUwishlonger?IwishHomerhadwrittenacontinuationoftheOdyssey,andtolduswhatOdysseusdidamongthefar—offmenwhonevertastedsaltnorheardofthesea.Alandepicaftertheseaepic,howgooditwouldhavebeen——fromHomer!ButitwouldhavetaxedtheimaginationofDantetocontinuetheadventuresofChristianandhiswifeaftertheyhadoncecrossedtheriverandreachedthecity.

  JohnBunyanhasbeenmorefortunatethanmostauthorsinoneofhisbiographies.

  HislifehasbeenwrittenbytheRev.Dr.Brown,whoisnowministerofhisoldcongregationatBedford;andanexcellentlifeitis.

  Dr.BrownisneitherRoundheadnorCavalier;forthoughheis,ofcourse,onBunyan’sside,hedoesnotthrowstonesatthebeautifulChurchofEngland.

  ProbablymostofusareonBunyan’ssidenow.Itmightbeagoodthingthatweshouldalldwelltogetherinreligiousunity,buthistoryshowsthatpeoplecannotbebribedintobrotherhood.TheytriedtobullyBunyan;theyarrestedandimprisonedhim——unfairlyeveninlaw,accordingtoDr.Brown,notunfairly,Mr.Froudethinks——andhewouldnotbebullied.

  Whatwasmuchmoreextraordinary,hewouldnotbeembittered.Inspiteofall,hestillcalledCharlesII.\"agraciousPrince.\"Whenasubjectisinconscienceatvariancewiththelaw,Bunyansaid,hehasbutonecourse——toacceptpeaceablythepunishmentwhichthelawawards.Hewasneversoured,neverangeredbytwelveyearsofdurance,notexactlyinaloathsomedungeon,butinveryuncomfortablequarters.Whentherecameabriefintervaloftoleration,hedidnotoccupyhimselfinbrawling,butinpreaching,andlookingafterthemannersandmoralsofthelittle\"church,\"

  includingonewomanwhobroughtdisagreeablechargesagainst\"BrotherHoneylove.\"Thechurchdecidedthattherewasnothinginthecharges,butsomehowthenameofBrotherHoneylovedoesnotinspireconfidence.

  AlmosteverybodyknowsthemainfactsofBunyan’slife.TheymaynotknowthathewasofNormandescent(asDr.Brownseemstosucceedinproving),northattheBunyanscameoverwiththeConqueror,northathewasagipsy,asothershold.OnDr.Brown’sshowing,Bunyan’sancestorslosttheirlandsinprocessoftimeandchange,andBunyan’sfatherwasatinker.Hepreferredtocallhimselfabrazier——hiswastheratherunexpectedtradetowhichMr.

  DickproposedapprenticingDavidCopperfield.

  Bunyanhimself,\"thewondrousbabe,\"asDr.Brownenthusiasticallystyleshim,waschristenedonNovember30th,1628.Hewasborninacottage,longfallen,andhardbywasamarshyplace,\"averitablesloughofdespond.\"BunyanmayhavehaditinmindwhenhewroteofthesloughwhereChristianhadsomuchtrouble.Hewasnotatravelledman:allhisknowledgeofpeopleandplaceshefoundathisdoors.Hehadsomeschooling,\"accordingtotherateofotherpoormen’schildren,\"andassuredlyitwasenough.

  Thegreatcivilwarbrokeout,andBunyanwasasoldier;hetellsusnotonwhichside.Dr.BrownandMr.LewisMorristhinkhewasonthatoftheParliament,buthisoldfather,thetinker,stoodfortheKing.Mr.Froudeisrathermoreinclinedtoholdthathewasamongthe\"gaygallantswhostruckforthecrown.\"Hedoesnotseemtohavebeenmuchunderfire,buthegotthatknowledgeoftheappearanceofwarwhichheusedinhissiegeoftheCityofMansoul.

  OnecanhardlythinkthatBunyanlikedwar——certainlynotfromcowardice,butfromgoodnessofheart.

  In1646thearmywasdisbanded,andBunyanwentbacktoElstowvillageandhistinkering,hisbell—ringing,hisdancingwiththegirls,hisplayingat\"cat\"onaSundayafterservice.

  Hemarriedveryyoungandpoor.Hemarriedapiouswife,andreadallherlibrary——\"ThePlainMan’sPathwaytoHeaven,\"and\"ThePracticeofPiety.\"HebecameverydevoutinthespiritoftheChurchofEngland,andhegaveuphisamusements.ThenhefellintotheSloughofDespond,thenhewentthroughtheValleyoftheShadow,andbattledwithApollyon.

  PeoplehavewonderedWHYhefanciedhimselfsuchasinner?Heconfessestohavingbeenaliarandablasphemer.IfImayguess,I

  fancythatthiswasmerelytheliterarygeniusofBunyanseekingforexpression.Hislies,Iwouldgobail,weretremendousromances,wildfictionstoldforfun,neverliesofcowardiceorforgain.Astohisblasphemies,hehadanextraordinarypoweroflanguage,andthatwashowhegaveitplay.\"Fancyswearing\"washisonlyliterarysafety—valve,inthoseearlydays,whenheplayedcatonElstowGreen.

  Thenheheardavoicedartfromheavenintohissoul,whichsaid,\"Wiltthouleavethysinsandgotoheaven,orhavethysinsandgotohell?\"Sohefellonrepentance,andpassedthoseawfulyearsofmentaltorture,whenallnatureseemedtotempthimtotheUnknownSin.

  Whatdidallthismean?ItmeantthatBunyanwaswithinanaceofmadness.

  Ithappenstoacertainproportionofmen,religiouslybroughtup,tosufferlikeBunyan.Theyhearvoices,theyareafraidofthatawfulunknowniniquity,andofeternaldeath,asBunyanandCowperwereafraid.

  WasitnotDeQuinceywhowasatschoolwithabullywhobelievedhehadbeenguiltyoftheunpardonableoffence?Bullyingisanoffencemuchlesspardonablethanmostmenareguiltyof.Theirbestplan(inBunyan’smisery)istotellApollyonthattheDevilisanass,todotheirworkandspeakthetruth.

  Bunyangotquitofhisterroratlast,brieflybybelievinginthegoodnessofGod.Hedidnotsay,likeMr.Carlyle,\"Well,ifallmyfearsaretrue,whatthen?\"HiswasaChristian,notastoicaldeliverance.

  The\"church\"inwhichBunyanfoundshelterhadforministeraconvertedmajorinaRoyalistregiment.Itwasaquaintlittlecommunity,thememberslivingliketheearlydisciples,correctingeachother’sfaults,andkeepingasevereeyeoneachother’slives.

  Bunyanbecameaministerinit;but,Puritanashewas,heletshisPilgrimsdanceonjoyfuloccasions,andevenMr.Ready—to—HaltwaltzeswithayoungladyofthePilgrimcompany.

  AsaministerandteacherBunyanbegantowritebooksofcontroversywithQuakersandclergymen.Thepointsdebatedarenolongerimportanttous;themainthingwasthathegotapenintohishand,andfoundaproperoutletforhisgenius,abetterwaythanfancyswearing.

  IfhehadnotbeencastintoBedfordjailforpreachinginacottage,hemightneverhavedreamedhisimmortaldream,norbecomeallthathewas.Theleisuresofgaolwerelong.Inthat\"den\"theMusecametohim,thefairkindMuseoftheHomeBeautiful.Hesawallthatcompanyofhis,solikeandsounlikeChaucer’s:Faithful,andHopeful,andChristian,thefellowshipoffiends,thetruculentCavaliersofVanityFair,andGiantDespair,withhisgrievouscrabtreecudgel;andotherpeoplehesawwhoarewithusalways,——

  thehandsomeMadamBubble,andtheyoungwomanwhosenamewasDull,andMr.WorldlyWiseman,andMr.FacingBothways,andByends,allthepersonsofthecomedyofhumanlife.

  HehearstheangelicsongsoftheCitybeyondtheriver;hehearsthem,butrepeatthemtoushecannot,\"forI’mnopoet,\"ashesayshimself.HebeheldthecountryofBeulah,andtheDelectableMountains,thatearthlyParadiseofnaturewherewemightbehappyyet,andwandernofarther,iftheworldwouldletus——fairmountainsinwhosestreamsIzaakWaltonwasthenevencastingangle.

  ItispleasanttofancyhowWaltonandBunyanmighthavemetandtalked,underaplanetreebytheOuse,whiletheMayshowerswerefalling.SurelyBunyanwouldnothavelikenedthegoodoldmantoFormalist;andcertainlyWaltonwouldhaveenjoyedtravellingwithChristian,thoughthebookwasbynoneofhisdearbishops,butbyaNon—conformist.Theyweremadetolikebutnottoconverteachother;inmattersecclesiasticaltheysawtheoppositesidesoftheshield.Eachwroteamasterpiece.Itistoolatetopraise\"TheCompleteAngler\"orthe\"Pilgrim’sProgress.\"Youmayputingenuityontherack,butshecansaynothingnewthatistrueaboutthebestromancethateverwasweddedtoallegory,noraboutthebestidylofoldEnglishlife.

  Thepeoplearelivingnow——allthepeople:thenoisybullyingjudges,asoftheFrenchRevolutionaryCourts,ortheHangingCourtsafterMonmouth’swar;thedemure,gravePuritangirls;andMatthew,whohadthegripes;andlazy,fecklessIgnorance,whocametosoillanend,poorfellow;andsturdyOldHonest,andtimidMr.Fearing;

  notsinglepersons,butdozens,ariseonthememory.

  Theycome,asfresh,asvivid,asiftheywereoutofScottorMoliere;theTinkerisasgreatamasterofcharacterandfictionasthegreatest,almost;hisstyleispure,andplain,andsound,fullofoldidioms,andevenofsomethinglikeoldslang.Butevenhisslangisclassical.

  Bunyaniseverybody’sauthor.TheveryCatholicshavetheirowneditionofthePilgrim:theyhavecutoutGiantPope,buthavebeentoogood—naturedtoinsertGiantProtestantinhisplace.

  Unheralded,unannounced,thoughnotuncriticised(theyaccusedtheTinkerofbeingaplagiarist,ofcourse),BunyanoutshonetheCourtwits,thelearned,thepoetsoftheRestoration,andeventhegreattheologians.

  Hisotherbooks,except\"GraceAbounding\"(anautobiography),\"TheHolyWar,\"and\"Mr.Badman,\"areonlyknowntostudents,normuchreadbythem.Thefashionofhistheology,asofalltheology,passedaway;itisbyvirtueofhisimagination,ofhisromance,thathelives.

  Theallegory,ofcourse,isfullofflaws.ItwouldnothavebeenmanlyofChristiantorunoffandsavehisownsoul,leavinghiswifeandfamily.ButBunyanshrankfromshowingushowdifficult,ifnotimpossible,itisforamarriedmantobeasaint.

  Christianawasreallywithhimallthroughthatpilgrimage;andhowhemusthavebeenhamperedbythatwomanoftheworld!Buthadtheallegoryclungmorecloselytotheskirtsoftruth,itwouldhavechangedfromaromancetoasatire,from\"ThePilgrim’sProgress\"to\"VanityFair.\"TherewastoomuchloveinBunyanforasatiristofthatkind;hehadjustenoughforahumourist.

  Borninanotherclass,hemighthavebeen,hewouldhavebeen,awritermorerefinedinhisstrength,moreuniformlyexcellent,butneversouniversalnorsopopularinthebestsenseoftheterm.

  InthechangeoftimesandbeliefitisnotimpossiblethatBunyanwillliveamongtheclasswhomheleastthoughtofaddressing——

  scholars,loversofworldlyliterature——fordevotionandpovertyarepartingcompany,whileartendurestillcivilisationperishes.

  ArewebetterorworsefornolongerbelievingasBunyanbelieved,nolongerseeingthatAbyssofPascal’sopenbesideourarmchairs?

  Thequestionisonlyaformofthatwideriddle,Doesanytheologicalorphilosophicalopinionmakeusbetterorworse?Thevastmajorityofmenandwomenarelittleaffectedbyschemesandtheoriesofthislifeandthenext.Theywhoevenaskforareplytotheriddlearethefew:mostofustaketheeasy—goingmoralityofourworldforaguide,aswetakeBradshawforarailwayjourney.

  Itisthefewwhomustfindoutananswer:onthatanswertheirlivesdepend,andthelivesofothersareinsensiblyraisedtowardstheirlevel.BunyanwouldnothavebeenaworsemanifhehadsharedthefaithofIzaakWalton.IzaakhadhisreplytoallquestionsintheChurchCatechismandtheArticles.Bunyanfoundhisinthetheologyofhissect,appealingmorestronglythanorthodoxytoanaturemorebellicosethanIzaak’s.Menlikehim,withhisindomitablecourage,willneverlackasolutionofthepuzzleoftheearth.Atworsttheywilllivebylaw,whethertheydaretospeakofitasGod’slaw,ordarenot.Theywillalwaysbeourleaders,ourCaptainGreathearts,inthepilgrimagetothecitywhere,ledorunled,wemustallatlastarrive.Theywillnotfailus,whileloyaltyandvalourarehumanqualities.ThedaymayconceivablycomewhenwehavenoChristiantomarchbeforeus,butweshallneverlackthecompanyofGreatheart.

  TOAYOUNGJOURNALIST

  DearSmith,—

  Youinformmethatyoudesiretobeajournalist,andyouarekindenoughtoaskmyadvice.Well,beajournalist,byallmeans,inanyhonestandhonourablebranchoftheprofession.Butdonotbeaneavesdropperandaspy.Youmayflyintoapassionwhenyoureceivethisveryplainlywordedadvice.Ihopeyouwill;but,forseveralreasons,whichInowgoontostate,Ifearthatyouwon’t.

  Ifearthat,eitherbynaturalgiftorbyacquiredhabit,youalreadypossesstheimperturbabletemperwhichwillbesousefultoyouifyoudojointhearmyofspiesandeavesdroppers.IfIamright,youhavemadeupyourmindtorefusetotakeoffence,aslongasbynottakingoffenceyoucanwriggleyourselfforwardinthebandofjournalisticreptiles.Youwillberevengedonme,inthatcase,someday;youwilllieinwaitformewithadirtybludgeon,andstealonmeoutofasewer.Ifyoudo,permitmetoassureyouthatIdon’tcare.Butifyouarealreadyinarage,ifyouareabouttearingupthisepistle,andarestartingtoassaultmepersonally,oratleasttoanswermefuriously,thenthereiseveryhopeforyouandforyourfuture.Ithereforeventuretostatemyreasonsforsupposingthatyouareinclinedtobeginacoursewhichyourfather,ifhewerealive,woulddeplore,asallhonourablemenintheirheartsmustdeploreit.WhenyouwereattheUniversity(letmecongratulateyouonyourdegree)youedited,orhelpedtoedit,TheBull—dog.Itwasnotaverybrilliantnoraverywitty,butitwasanextremely\"racy\"periodical.Itspokeofallmenanddonsbytheirnicknames.Itwasfullofsecond—handslang.Itcontainedmanypersonalanecdotes,tothedetrimentofmanypeople.

  Itprintedgarbledandspitefulversionsofprivateconversationsonprivateaffairs.Itdidnotevensparetomakecommentsonladies,andonthedetailsofdomesticlifeinthetownandintheUniversity.ThecopieswhichyousentmeIglancedatwithextremedisgust.

  Inmytime,morethanascoreofyearsago,asimilarperiodical,butamuchmorecleverperiodical,wasputforthbymembersoftheUniversity.Itcontainedanovelwhich,evennow,wouldbeworthseveralill—gottenguineastothemakersofthechroniquescandaleuse.Butnobodyboughtit,anditdiedanearlydeath.

  Timeshavealtered,Iamafogey;buttheideasofhonouranddecencywhichfogiesholdnowwereheldbyyoungmeninthesixtiesofourcentury.Iknowverywellthattheseideasareobsolete.I

  amnotpreachingtotheworld,norhopingtoconvertsociety,buttoYOU,andpurelyinyourownprivate,spiritualinterest.Ifyouenteronthispathoftattle,mendacity,andmalice,andif,withyourclevernessandlighthand,youaresuccessful,societywillnotturnitsbackonyou.Youwillbefearedinmanyquarters,andwelcomedinothers.Ofyourparagraphspeoplewillsaythat\"itisashame,ofcourse,butitisveryamusing.\"Therearesomanyshamesintheworld,shamesnotatallamusing,thatyoumayseenoharminaddingtothenumber.\"IfIdon’tdoit,\"youmayargue,\"someoneelsewill.\"Undoubtedly;butWHYSHOULDYOUDOIT?

  Youarenotastarvingscribbler;ifyoudeterminetowrite,youcanwritewell,thoughnotsoeasily,onmanytopics.Youhavenotthatlastsadexcuseofhunger,whichdrivespoorwomentothestreets,andmakesunhappymenactaspublicblabsandspies.IfYOUtaketothismetier,itmustbebecauseyoulikeit,whichmeansthatyouenjoybeingalistenertoandreporteroftalkthatwasnevermeantforanyearsexceptthoseinwhichitwasuttered.ItmeansthatthehospitableboardisnotsacredforYOU;itmeansthat,withyou,friendship,honour,allthatmakeshumanlifebetterthanalowsmoking—room,areonlyvaluableforwhattheirbetrayalwillbring.

  ItmeansthatnoteventhewelfareofyourcountrywillpreventyoufromrunningtothePresswithanysecretwhichyoumayhavebeenentrustedwith,orwhichyoumayhavesurprised.Itmeans,thispeculiarkindofprofession,thatallthingsopenandexcellent,andconspicuoustoallmen,arewithyouofnoaccount.Art,literature,politics,aretoceasetointerestyou.Youaretoschemetosurprisegossipabouttheprivatelives,dress,andtalkofartists,menofletters,politicians.Yourprofessionalworkwillsinkbelowthelevelofservants’gossipinapublic—houseparlour.Ifyouhappentomeetamanofknownname,youwillwatchhim,willlistentohim,willtrytosneakintohisconfidence,andyouwillblab,formoney,abouthim,andyourblabwillinevitablybemendacious.Inshort,likethemostpitiableoutcastsofwomankind,and,withouttheirexcuse,youwilllivebysellingyourhonour.Youwillnotsuffermuch,norsufferlong.Yourconsciencewillveryspeedilybesearedwithared—hotiron.Youwillbeontheroadwhichleadsfrommeredishonourtocrime;andyoumayfindyourselfactuallypractisingchantage,andextortingmoneyasthepriceofyoursilence.Thisisthelowestdeep:thevastmajority,evenofsocialmouchards,donotsinksolowasthis.

  Theprofessionofthecritic,eveninhonourableandopencriticism,isbesetwithdangers.Itisoftenhardtoavoidsayinganunkindthing,acruelthing,whichissmart,andwhichmayevenbedeserved.Whocansaythathehasescapedthistemptation,andwhatmanofheartcanthinkofhisownfallwithoutasenseofshame?

  Thereare,Iadmit,authorssoantipathetictome,thatIcannottrustmyselftoreviewthem.WouldthatIhadneverreviewedthem!

  Theycannotbesobadastheyseemtome:theymusthavequalitieswhichescapemyobservation.Thenthereisthetemptationtohitback.Someonewrites,unjustlyorunkindlyasyouthink,ofyouorofyourfriends.Youwaittillyourenemyhaswrittenabook,andthenyouhaveyourinnings.Itisnotinnaturethatyourreviewshouldbefair:youmustinevitablybemoreonthelook—outforfaultsthanmerits.Theereintage,the\"smashing\"ofaliteraryfoeisverydelightfulatthemoment,butitdoesnotlookwellinthelightofreflection.Butthesedeedsaremerepeccadilloescomparedwiththeconfirmedhabitofregardingallmenandwomenasfairgameforpersonaltattleandthesatingofprivatespite.Nobody,perhaps,beginswiththisintention.Mostmenandwomencanfindreadysophistries.Ifareportaboutanyonereachestheirears,theysaythattheyaredoinghimaservicebypublishingitandenablinghimtocontradictit.Asifanymortaleverlistenedtoacontradiction!Andtherearecharges——thatofplagiarism,forexample——whichcanneverbedisproved,evenifcontradictionswerelistenedtobythepublic.Theaccusationgoeseverywhere,iscopiedintoeveryprintedrag;thecontradictiondieswiththedailydeathofasinglenewspaper.Youmayreplythatamanofsensewillbeindifferenttofalseaccusations.Hemay,ormaynotbe,——thatisnotthequestionforyou;thequestionforyouiswhetheryouwillcirculatenewsthatisfalse,probably,andspiteful,certainly.

  Inshort,thewholeaffairregardsyourselfmorethanitregardstheworld.Plentyofpoisonissold:isitwellforyoutobeoneofthemerchants?Isitthebusinessofaneducatedgentlemantolivebythetradeofaneavesdropperandablab?IntheMemoirsofM.

  BlowitzhetellsyouhowhebeganhisillustriouscareerbyprocuringthepublicationofremarkswhichM.Thiershadmadetohim.Hethen\"wenttoseeM.Thiers,notwithoutsomeapprehension.\"Isthatthekindofemotionwhichyouwishtobehabitualinyourexperience?Doyouthinkitagreeabletobecomeshame—facedwhenyoumeetpeoplewhohaveconversedwithyoufrankly?Doyouenjoybeingasneak,andfeelinglikeasneak?Doyoufindblushingpleasant?Ofcourseyouwillsoonlosethepowerofblushing;butisthatanagreeableprospect?Dependonit,therearediscomfortsintheprogresstothebrazen,inthejourneytotheshameless.Youmay,ifyourtattleispolitical,becomeserviceabletomenengagedingreataffairs.Theymayevenaskyoutotheirhouses,ifthatisyourambition.Youmayurgethattheycondoneyourdeeds,andareevenartandpartinthem.Butyoumustalsobeawarethattheycallyou,andthinkyou,areptile.Youarenotoneofthosewhowilldothedevil’sworkwithoutthedevil’swages;butdoyouseriouslythinkthatthewagesareworththedegradation?

  Manymenthinkso,andarenotinotherrespectsbadmen.Theymayevenbekindlyandgenial.Gentlementheycannotbe,normenofdelicacy,normenofhonour.Theyhavesoldthemselvesandtheirself—respect,somewithease(theyaretheleastblamable),somewithastruggle.Theyhaveseenbetterthings,andperhapsvainlylongtoreturntothem.Theseare\"St.Satan’sPenitents,\"andtheirremorseisvain:

  Virtutemvideant,intabescantquerelicta.

  Ifyoudon’twishtobeofthisdismalcompany,thereisonlyonecourseopentoyou.Neverwriteforpublicationonelineofpersonaltattle.Letallmen’spersonsandprivatelivesbeassacredtoyouasyourfather’s,——thoughtherearetattlerswhowouldsellparagraphsabouttheirownmothersiftherewereamarketfortheware.Thereisnohalf—wayhouseonthisroad.Oncebegintoprintprivateconversation,andyouarelost——lost,thatis,todelicacyandgradually,tomanyotherthingsexcellentandofgoodreport.Thewholequestionforyouis,Doyoumindincurringthisdamnation?Ifthereisnothinginitwhichappalsandrevoltsyou,ifyourconscienceissatisfiedwithafewreadysophisms,orifyoudon’tcareapinforyourconscience,fallto!

  Vousirezloin!Youwillprattleinprintaboutmen’sprivatelivestheirhiddenmotives,theirwaistcoats,theirwives,theirboots,theirbusinesses,theirincomes.Mostofyourprattlewillinevitablybelies.Butgoon!nobodywillkickyou,Ideeplyregrettosay.Youwillearnmoney.Youwillbewelcomedinsociety.Youwillliveanddiecontent,andwithoutremorse.Idonotsupposethatanyparticularinfernowillawaityouinthefuturelife.Whoeverwatchesthisworld\"withlargerothereyesthanours\"

  willdoubtlessmakeallowanceforyou,asforusall.Iamnotpretendingtobeawhitbetterthanyou;probablyIamworseinmanyways,butnotinyourway.Puttingitmerelyasamatteroftaste,Idon’tliketheway.Itmakesmesick——thatisall.ItisasinwhichIcancomfortablydamn,asIamnotinclinedtoit.Youmayputitinthatlight;andIhavenowayofconvertingyou,nor,ifI

  havenotdissuadedyou,ofdissuadingyou,fromcontinuing,onalargerscale,yourpracticesinTheBull—dog.

  MR.KIPLING’SSTORIES

  Thewindblowethwhereitlisteth.ButthewindofliteraryinspirationhasrarelyshakenthebungalowsofIndia,as,inthetalesoftheoldJesuitmissionaries,themagicalairshookthefrail\"medicinetents,\"whereHuronconjurorspractisedtheirmysteries.Withaworldofromanceandofcharacterattheirdoors,EnglishmeninIndiahaveseenasiftheysawitnot.Theyhavebeenbusyingoverning,inmakingwar,makingpeace,buildingbridges,layingdownroads,andwritingofficialreports.Ourliteraturefromthatcontinentofourconquesthasbeensparseindeed,exceptinthewayofbiographies,ofhistories,andofratherlocalandunintelligiblefacetiae.Exceptthenovelsbytheauthorof\"Tara,\"

  andSirHenryCunningham’sbrilliantsketches,suchas\"Dustypore,\"

  andSirAlfredLyall’spoems,wemightalmostsaythatIndiahascontributednothingtoourfinerliterature.Thatoldhauntofhistory,thewealthofcharacterbroughtoutinthatconfusionofraces,ofreligions,andtheoldandnew,hasbeenwealthuntouched,atreasure—housesealed:thosepagodatreeshaveneverbeenshaken.

  AtlasttherecomesanEnglishmanwitheyes,withapenextraordinarilydeft,anobservationmarvellouslyrapidandkeen;

  and,bygoodluck,thisEnglishmanhasnoofficialduties:heisneitherasoldier,norajudge;heismerelyamanofletters.Hehasleisuretolookaroundhim,hehasthepowerofmakingusseewhathesees;and,whenwehavelostIndia,whensomenewpowerisrulingwhereweruled,whenourempirehasfollowedthatoftheMoguls,futuregenerationswilllearnfromMr.Kipling’sworkswhatIndiawasunderEnglishsway.

  Itisoneofthesurprisesofliteraturethatthesetinymasterpiecesinproseandversewerepoured,\"asrichmengivethatcarenotfortheirgifts,\"intothecolumnsofAnglo—Indianjournals.Theretheywerethoughtcleverandephemeral——partofthechatteroftheweek.Thesubjects,nodoubt,seemedsofamiliar,thatthestrengthofthehandling,thebrillianceofthecolour,werescarcelyrecognised.ButMr.Kipling’svolumesnosoonerreachedEnglandthanthepeopleintowhosehandstheyfellwerecertainthatherewerethebeginningsofanewliteraryforce.Thebookshadthestrangeness,thecolour,thevariety,theperfumeoftheEast.ThusitisnowonderthatMr.Kipling’sreputegrewupasrapidlyasthemysteriousmangotreeoftheconjurors.Therewerecritics,ofcourse,readytosaythatthethingwasmerelyatrick,andhadnothingofthesupernatural.Thatopinionisnotlikelytoholditsground.PerhapsthemostsevereofthecriticshasbeenayoungScotchgentleman,writingFrench,andwritingitwonderfullywell,inaParisianreview.HechosetoregardMr.KiplingaslittlebutanimitatorofBretHarte,derivinghispopularitymainlyfromthenovelandexoticcharacterofhissubjects.Nodoubt,ifMr.Kiplinghasaliteraryprogenitor,itisMr.BretHarte.AmonghisearlierversesafewarewhatanimitatoroftheAmericanmighthavewritteninIndia.ButitisawildjudgmentwhichtracesMr.

  Kipling’ssuccesstohisuse,forexample,ofAnglo—Indianphrasesandscrapsofnativedialects.ThepresenceoftheseelementsisamongthecauseswhichhavemadeEnglishmenthinkAnglo—Indianliteraturetediouslyprovincial,andIndiaabore.Mr.Kipling,ontheotherhand,makesusregardthecontinentwhichwasaboreanenchantedland,fullofmarvelsandmagicwhicharereal.Therehas,indeed,arisenatasteforexoticliterature:peoplehavebecomealivetothestrangenessandfascinationoftheworldbeyondtheboundsofEuropeandtheUnitedStates.Butthatisonlybecausemenofimaginationandliteraryskillhavebeenthenewconquerors——theCortesesandBalboasofIndia,Africa,Australia,Japan,andtheislesofthesouthernseas.Allsuchconquerors,whethertheywritewiththepolishofM.PierreLoti,orwiththecarelessnessofMr.Boldrewood,have,atleast,seennewworldsforthemselves;havegoneoutofthestreetsoftheover—populatedlandsintotheopenair;havesailedandridden,walkedandhunted;haveescapedfromthefogandsmokeoftowns.Newstrengthhascomefromfresherairintotheirbrainsandblood;hencethenoveltyandbuoyancyofthestorieswhichtheytell.Hence,too,theyarerathertobecountedamongromanticiststhanrealists,howeverrealistheessentialtruthoftheirbooks.Theyhavefoundsomuchtoseeandtorecord,thattheyarenottemptedtousethemicroscope,andporeforeverontheminuteincharacter.Agreatdealofrealism,especiallyinFrance,attractsbecauseitisnovel,becauseM.Zolaandothershavealsofoundnewworldstoconquer.Butcertainprovincesinthoseworldswerenotunknownto,butwerevoluntarilyneglectedby,earlierexplorers.Theywerethe\"BadLands\"oflifeandcharacter:surelyitiswisertoseekquitenewrealmsthantobuildmudhutsanddunghillsonthe\"BadLands.\"

  Mr.Kipling’swork,likeallgoodwork,isbothrealandromantic.

  Itisrealbecauseheseesandfeelsveryswiftlyandkeenly;itisromantic,again,becausehehasasharpeyefortherealityofromance,fortheattractionandpossibilityofadventure,andbecauseheisyoung.Ifareaderwantstoseepettycharactersdisplayedinalltheirmeannesses,ifthisberealism,surelycertainofMr.Kipling’spaintedandfriskymatronsarerealisticenough.TheseamysideofAnglo—Indianlife:theintrigues,amorousorsemi—political——theslangofpeoplewhodescribediningas\"manglinggarbage\"the\"gamesoftenniswiththeseventhcommandment\"——hehasnotneglectedanyofthese.Probablythesketchesaretrueenough,andpity’tistrue:forexample,thesketchesin\"UndertheDeodars\"andin\"TheGadsbys.\"Thatworthypair,withtheirfriends,aretomyselfasunsympathetic,almost,asthecharactersin\"LaConquetedePlassans.\"ButMr.Kiplingistoomuchatruerealisttomaketheirselfishnessandpettinessunbroken,unceasing.Weknowthat\"Gaddy\"isabrave,modest,andhard—workingsoldier;and,whenhislittlesillybride(whoprefersbeingkissedbyamanwithwaxedmoustaches)liesneartodeath,certainlyIamnearertotearsthanwhenIamobligedtoattendthebedofLittleDombeyorofLittleNell.ProbablythereisagreatdealofslangyandunrefinedAnglo—Indiansociety;and,nodoubt,tosketchitinitstruecoloursisnotbeyondtheprovinceofart.Atworstitisredeemed,inpart,byitsconstancyinthepresenceofvariousperils——fromdisease,andfrom\"thebulletflyingdownthepass.\"Mr.Kiplingmaynotbe,andveryprobablyisnot,areaderof\"Gyp\";but\"TheGadsbys,\"especially,readsliketheworkofanAnglo—Indiandisciple,trammelledbycertainEnglishconventions.

  ThemorePharisaicrealists——thoseofthestrictestsect——wouldprobablywelcomeMr.Kiplingasayoungerbrother,sofaras\"UndertheDeodars\"and\"TheGadsbys\"areconcerned,ifhewerenotoccasionallywittyandevenflippant,aswellasrealistic.But,veryfortunately,hehasnotconfinedhisobservationtotheleisuresandpleasuresofSimla;hehaslookedoutalsoonwarandonsport,onthelifeofallnativetribesandcastes;andhasevenglancedacrossthebordersof\"TheUndiscoveredCountry.\"

  AmongMr.Kipling’sdiscoveriesofnewkindsofcharacters,probablythemostpopularishisinventionoftheBritishsoldierinIndia.

  Heaversthathe\"lovesthatverystrongman,ThomasAtkins\";buthisaffectionhasnotblindedhimtothefaultsofthebeloved.Mr.

  Atkinsdrinkstoomuch,istoocarelessagallantinlove,hasbeeneducatedeithertoomuchortoolittle,andhasotherfaults,partlydue,apparently,torecentmilitaryorganisation,partlytothefeverishandunsettledstateofthecivilisedworld.Butheisstillbrave,whenheiswellled;stillloyal,aboveall,tohis\"trustychum.\"EveryEnglishmanmusthopethat,ifTerenceMulvaneydidnottakethecityofLungtungPenasdescribed,yetheisready,andwillingsototakeit.Mr.MulvaneyisashumorousasMickyFree,butmoremelancholyandmoretruculent.Hehas,perhaps,\"wonhiswaytothemythical\"already,andisnotsomuchasoldier,asanincarnation,notofKrishna,butofmanysoldierlyqualities.Ontheotherhand,PrivateOrtheris,especiallyinhisfrenzy,seemstoshewallthetruth,andmuchmorethanthelifeof,aphotograph.

  Such,wepresume,isthesoldier,andsucharehisexperiencesandtemptationsandrepentance.Butnobodyeverdreamedoftellingusallthis,tillMr.Kiplingcame.Asforthesoldierinaction,the\"TakingofLungtungPen,\"andthe\"DrumsoftheForeandAft,\"andthatothertaleofthebattlewiththePathansinthegorge,areamongthegoodfightsoffiction.Theystirthespirit,andtheyshouldbedistributed(inaddition,ofcourse,tothe\"Soldier’sPocketBook\")intheranksoftheBritisharmy.Mr.Kiplingisaswellinformedaboutthesoldier’swomen—kindasaboutthesoldier:

  aboutDinahShaddasaboutTerenceMulvaney.Leverneverinstructedusonthesematters:MickyFree,ifheloves,ridesaway;butTerenceMulvaneyistruetohisoldwoman.Gallant,loyal,reckless,vain,swaggering,andtender—hearted,TerenceMulvaney,iftherewereenoughofhim,\"wouldtakeSt.Petersburginhisdrawers.\"Canwebetoogratefultoanauthorwhohasextended,asMr.Kiplinginhismilitarysketcheshasextended,thefrontiersofourknowledgeandsympathy?

  Itisamerequestionofindividualtaste;but,formyownpart,hadItomakeasmallselectionfromMr.Kipling’stales,IwouldincludemoreofhisstudiesinBlackthaninWhite,andmanyofhisexcursionsbeyondtheprobableandnatural.Itisdifficulttohaveonespecialfavouriteinthiskind;butperhapsthestoryofthetwoEnglishadventurersamongthefreemasonsofunknownKafiristan(inthe\"PhantomRickshaw\")wouldtakeaveryhighplace.Thegas—

  heatedairoftheIndiannewspaperofficeissoreal,andintoitcomesawandererwhohasseennewfacesofdeath,andwhocarrieswithhimaheadthathaswornaroyalcrown.Thecontrastsareofbrutalforce;thelegendisamongthebestofsuchstrangefancies.

  Thenthereis,inthesamevolume,\"TheStrangeRideofMorrowbieJukes,\"themostdreadfulnightmareofthemostawfulBunkerintherealmsoffancy.Thisisaveryearlywork;ifnothingelseofMr.

  Kipling’sexisted,hismemorymightlivebyit,asdoesthememoryoftheAmericanIrishmanbythe\"DiamondLens.\"Theshammagicof\"IntheHouseofSuddhu\"isasterribleastruenecromancycouldbe,andIhaveafaiblesseforthe\"BisaraofPooree.\"\"TheGateoftheHundredSorrows\"isarealisticversionof\"TheEnglishOpiumEater,\"andmorepowerfulbydintoflessrhetoric.Asforthesketchesofnativelife——forexample,\"OntheCityWall\"——toEnglishreaderstheyarenolessthanrevelations.Theytestify,moreeventhanthemilitarystories,totheauthor’sswiftandcertainvision,hiscertaintyinhiseffects.Inbrief,Mr.Kiplinghasconqueredworlds,ofwhich,asitwere,weknewnottheexistence.

  Hisfaultsaresoconspicuous,somuchonthesurface,thattheyhardlyneedtobenamed.Theyarecuriouslyvisibletosomereaderswhoareblindtohismerits.Thereisafalseairofhardness(quiteincontradictiontothesentimentinhistalesofchildishlife);thereisaknowingair;therearemannerisms,suchas\"Butthatisanotherstory\";thereisadisplayofslang;thereisthetooobtrusiveknockingofthenailonthehead.Everybodycanmarktheseerrors;afewcannotovercometheirantipathy,andsoloseagreatdealofpleasure.

  ItisimpossibletoguesshowMr.Kiplingwillfareifheventuresononeoftheusualnovels,oftheorthodoxlength.Fewmenhavesucceededbothintheconteandthenovel.Mr.BretHarteislimitedtotheconte;M.GuydeMaupassantisprobablyathisbestinit.Scottwrotebutthreeorfourshorttales,andonlyoneoftheseisamasterpiece.Poeneverattemptedanovel.Hawthorneisalmostaloneinhiscommandofbothkinds.WecanliveonlyinthehopethatMr.Kipling,soskilledinsomanyspeciesoftheconte,sovigorousinsomanykindsofverse,willalsobetriumphantinthenovel:thoughitseemsunlikelythatitsscenecanbeinEngland,andthoughitiscertainthatawriterwhosocutstothequickwillnotbehappywiththenovel’salmostinevitable\"padding.\"Mr.Kipling’slongesteffort,\"TheLightwhichFailed,\"

  can,perhaps,hardlybeconsideredatestortouchstoneofhispowersasanovelist.Thecentralinterestisnotpowerfulenough;

  thecharactersarenotsosympathetic,asaretheinterestandthecharactersofhisshortpieces.Manyofthesepersonswehavemetsooftenthattheyarenotmerepassingacquaintances,butalreadyfindinustheloyaltyduetooldfriends.

  Footnotes:

  {1}ThesubjecthasbeenmuchmoregravelytreatedinMr.RobertBridges’s\"AchillesinScyros.\"

  {2}Conjecturemaycease,asMr.MorrishastranslatedtheOdyssey.

  {3}ForHelenPendennis,seethe\"Letters,\"p.97.

  {4}Mr.Henleyhaslately,asaloyalDickensite,beendefendingtheplotsofDickens,andhistragedy.Procaptulectoris;ifthereaderlikesthem,thentheyaregoodforthereader:\"goodabsolute,notformethough,\"perhaps.Theplotof\"MartinChuzzlewit\"maybegood,buttheconductofoldMartinwouldstrikemeasimprobableifImetitinthe\"ArabianNights.\"ThatthecreatorofPecksniffshouldhavetakenhismisdeedsseriously,asifMr.PecksniffhadbeenaTartuffe,notadelight,seemscurious.

点击下载App,搜索"Essays in Little",免费读到尾