第1章
加入书架 A- A+
点击下载App,搜索"Literary Boston As I Knew It",免费读到尾

  byWilliamDeanHowells

  Amongmyfellow—passengersonthetrainfromNewYorktoBoston,whenI

  wenttobeginmyworktherein1866,astheassistanteditoroftheAtlanticMonthly,wasthelateSamuelBowles,oftheSpringfieldRepublican,whocreatedinasubordinatecityajournalofmetropolitanimportance。IhadmethiminVeniceseveralyearsearlier,whenhewassufferingfromthecruelinsomniawhichhadfollowedhisoverworkonthatnewspaper,andwhenhetoldmethathewassleepingscarcelymorethanonehouroutofthetwenty—four。Hiswornfaceattestedthemiserywhichthismusthavebeen,andwhichlastedinsomemeasurewhilehelived,thoughIbelievethatrestandtravelrelievedhiminhislateryears。

  Hewasalwaysamanofcordialfriendliness,andhenowexpressedamostgratifyinginterestwhenItoldhimwhatIwasgoingtodoinBoston。

  HegavehimselfthepleasureofdescantinguponthedramaticqualityofthefactthatayoungnewspapermanfromOhiowasabouttoshareinthedestiniesofthegreatliteraryperiodicalofNewEngland。

  I。

  Idonotthinkthatsuchafactwouldnowmovethefancyoftheliveliestnewspaperman,somuchhastheWestsincereturnedupontheEastinarefluentwaveofauthorship。ButthentheWestwasalmostanunknownqualityinourliteraryproblem;andinfacttherewasscarcelyanyliteratureoutsideofNewEngland。EventhiswasofNewEnglandorigin,foritwasalmostwhollytheworkofNewEnglandmenandwomeninthe\"splendidexile\"ofNewYork。TheAtlanticMonthly,whichwasdistinctivelyliterary,wasdistinctivelyaNewEnglandmagazine,thoughfromthefirstithadbeencharacterizedbywhatwasmorenational,whatwasmoreuniversal,intheNewEnglandtemperament。ItschiefcontributorsfornearlytwentyyearswereLongfellow,Lowell,Holmes,Whittier,Emerson,DoctorHale,ColonelHigginson,Mrs。Stowe,Whipple,RoseTerryCooke,Mrs。JuliaWardHowe,Mrs。PrescottSpofford,Mrs。

  PhelpsWard,andotherNewEnglandwriterswhostilllivedinNewEngland,andlargelyintheregionofBoston。OccasionallytherecameapoemfromBryant,atNewYork,fromMr。Stedman,fromMr。StoddardandMrs。Stoddard,fromMr。Aldrich,andfromBayardTaylor。Butallthese,exceptthelast,werenotonlyofNewEnglandrace,butofNewEnglandbirth。IthinktherewasnocontributorfromtheSouthbutMr。M。D。

  Conway,andasyettheWestscarcelycounted,thoughfouryoungpoetsfromOhio,whowerenotimmediatelyorremotelyofPuritanorigin,hadappearedinearlynumbers;AliceCary,livingwithhersisterinNewYork,hadwrittennowandthenfromthebeginning。Mr。JohnHaysolelyrepresentedIllinoisbyasinglepaper,andhewasofRhodeIslandstock。

  ItwasaftermysettlementatBostonthatMarkTwain,ofMissouri,becameafigureofworld—widefameatHartford;andlongerafter,thatMr。BretHartemadethatprogressEastwardfromCaliforniawhichwastelegraphedalmostfromhourtohour,asifitweretheprogressofaprince。

  MissConstanceF。Woolsonhadnotyetbeguntowrite。Mr。JamesWhitcombRiley,Mr。MauriceThompson,MissEdithThomas,OctaveThanet,Mr。CharlesWarrenStoddard,Mr。H。B。Fuller,Mrs。Catherwood,Mr。HamlinGarland,allwhomInameatrandomamongotherWesternwriters,werethenasunknownasMr。Cable,MissMurfree,Mrs。RivesChanler,MissGraceKing,Mr。JoelChandlerHarris,Mr。ThomasNelsonPage,intheSouth,whichtheybynomeansfullyrepresent。

  TheeditorsoftheAtlantichadbeeneagerfromthebeginningtodiscoveranyoutlyingliterature;but,asIhavesaid,therewasinthosedaysverylittlegoodwritingdonebeyondthebordersofNewEngland。Ifthecaseisnowdifferent,andthebestknownamonglivingAmericanwritersarenolongerNew—Englanders,stillIdonotthinktheSouthandWesthaveyettrimmedthebalance;andthoughperhapsthenewswritersnowmorecommonlyappearinthosequarters,IshouldnotbesoverysurethattheyarenotstillcharacterizedbyNewEnglandidealsandexamples。

  Ontheotherhand,Iamverysurethatinmyearlydaywewerecharacterizedbythem,andwishedtobeso;weevenfeltthatwefailedinsofarasweexpressedsomethingnativequiteinourownway。

  TheliterarytheoriesweacceptedwereNewEnglandtheories,thecriticismwevaluedwasNewEnglandcriticism,or,morestrictlyspeaking,Bostontheories,Bostoncriticism。

  OfthosemoreconstantcontributorstotheAtlanticwhomIhavementioned,itisofcourseknownthatLongfellowandLowelllivedinCambridge,EmersonatConcord,andWhittieratAmesbury。ColonelHigginsonwasstillandformanyyearsafterwardsatNewport;Mrs。StowewasthenatAndover;MissPrescottofNewburyporthadbecomeMrs。

  Spofford,andwaspresentlyinBoston,whereherhusbandwasamemberoftheGeneralCourt;Mrs。PhelpsWard,asMissElizabethStuartPhelps,dweltinherfather’shouseatAndover。ThechiefoftheBostonianswereMrs。JuliaWardHowe,DoctorHolmes,andDoctorHale。YetBostonstoodforthewholeMassachusettsgroup,andMassachusetts,intheliteraryimpulse,meantNewEngland。Isupposewemustallallow,whetherweliketodosoornot,thattheimpulseseemsnowtohaveprettywellspentitself。CertainlythecityofBostonhasdistinctlywanedinliterature,thoughithaswaxedinwealthandpopulation。IdonotthinkthereareinBostonto—dayevensomanytalentswithaliterarycoloringinlaw,science,theology,andjournalismastherewereformerly;thoughIhavenobeliefthattheBostontalentsarefewerorfeeblerthanbefore。

  IarrivedinBoston,however,whenalltalentshadmoreorlessaliterarycoloring,andwhenthegreatesttalentswereliterary。Theseexpressedwithripenedfulnessacivilizationconceivedinfaithandbroughtforthingoodworks;butthatmomentofmaturitywasthebeginningofadecadencewhichcouldonlyshowitselfmuchlater。NewEnglandhasceasedtobeanationinitself,anditwillperhapsneveragainhaveanythinglikeanationalliterature;butthatwassomethinglikeanationalliterature;anditwillprobablybecenturiesyetbeforethelifeofthewholecountry,theAmericanlifeasdistinguishedfromtheNewEnglandlife,shallhaveanythingsolikeanationalliterature。

  ItwillbelongbeforeourlargerlifeinterpretsitselfinsuchimaginationasHawthorne’s,suchwisdomasEmerson’s,suchpoetryasLongfellow’s,suchprophecyasWhittier’s,suchwitandgraceasHolmes’s,suchhumorandhumanityasLowell’s。

  Theliteratureofthosegreatmenwas,ifImaysuffermyselfthefigure,theSociniangraftofaCalviniststock。Theirfaith,initsvariedshades,wasUnitarian,buttheirartwasPuritan。Sofarasitwasimperfect——andgreatandbeautifulasitwas,Ithinkithaditsimperfections——itwasmarredbytheintenseethicismthatpervadedtheNewEnglandmindfortwohundredyears,andthatstillcharacterizesit。

  Theyortheirfathershadbrokenawayfromorthodoxyinthegreatschismatthebeginningofthecentury,but,asiftheirheterodoxywereconscience—stricken,theystillhelplesslypointedthemoralinalltheydid;somepointeditmoredirectly,somelessdirectly;buttheyallpointedit。Ishouldbefarfromblamingthemfortheirethicalintention,thoughIthinktheyfelttheirvocationasprophetstoomuchfortheirgoodaspoets。Sometimestheysacrificedthesongtothesermon,thoughnotalways,nornearlyalways。Itwasinpoetryandinromancethattheyexcelled;inthenovel,sofarastheyattemptedit,theyfailed。IsaythiswiththenamesofalltheBostoniangroup,andthosetheyinfluenced,inmind,andwithafullsenseoftheirgreatness。

  Itmaybeungracioustosaythattheyhaveleftnoheirstotheirpeculiargreatness;butitwouldbefoolishtosaythattheyleftanestatewheretheyhadnonetobequeath。OnecannottakeaccountofsuchafantasyasJudd’sMargaret。TheonlyNew—EnglanderwhohasattemptedthenovelonascaleproportionedtotheworkoftheNew—Englandersinphilosophy,inpoetry,inromance,isMr。DeForest,whoisofNewHaven,andnotofBoston。IdonotforgetthefictionsofDoctorHolmes,orthevividinventionsofDoctorHale,butIdonotcallthemnovels;andIdonotforgettheexquisitelyrealisticartofMissJewettorMissWilkins,whichisfreefromtheethicismofthegreatNewEnglandgroup,butwhichhashardlythenovelists’sscope。NewEngland,inHawthorne’swork,achievedsupremacyinromance;buttheromanceisalwaysanallegory,andthenovelisapictureinwhichthetruthtolifeissufferedtodoitsunsermonizedofficeforconduct;andNewEnglandyetlackshernovelist,becauseitwasherinstinctandherconscienceinfictiontobetruetoanidealofliferatherthantolifeitself。

  Evenwhenwecometotheexceptionthatprovestherule,eventosuchasignalexceptionas’UncleTom’sCabin’,IthinkthatwhatIsayholdstrue。Thatisalmostthegreatestworkofimaginationthatwehaveproducedinprose,anditistheworkofaNewEnglandwoman,writingfromalltheinspirationsandtraditionsofNewEngland。ItislikebeggingthequestiontosaythatIdonotcallitanovel,however;butreally,isitanovel,inthesensethat’WarandPeace’isanovel,or’MadameFlaubert’,or’L’Assommoir’,or’PhineasFinn’,or’DonaPerfecta’,or’EstherWaters’,or’MartayMaria’,or’TheReturnoftheNative’,or’VirginSoil’,or’DavidGrieve’?Inacertainwayitisgreaterthananyoftheseexceptthefirst;butitschiefvirtue,oritsprimevirtue,isinitsaddresstotheconscience,andnotitsaddresstothetaste;totheethicalsense,nottheaestheticalsense。

  Thisdoesnotquitesaythething,butitsuggestsit,andIshouldbesorryifitconveyedtoanyreaderasenseofslight;forIbelievenoonehasfeltmoredeeplythanmyselfthevalueofNewEnglandinliterature。ThecomparisonoftheliterarysituationatBostontotheliterarysituationatEdinburghinthetimesofthereviewershasneverseemedtomeaccurateoradequate,anditholdschieflyinthefactthatbothseemtobeofthepast。CertainlyNewYorkisyetnoLondoninliterature,andIthinkBostonwasoncevastlymorethanEdinburgheverwas,atleastinquality。TheScotchliteratureofthepalmydayswasnotwhollyScotch,andevenwhenitwasrootedinScotchsoilitfloweredintheairofanalienspeech。ButtheNewEnglandliteratureofthegreatdaywastheblossomofaNewEnglandroot;andthelanguagewhichtheBostonianswrotewasthenativeEnglishofscholarsfitlytheheirsofthosewhohadbroughtthelearningoftheuniversitiestoMassachusettsBaytwohundredyearsbefore,andwasofaspurealineageastheEnglishofthemother—country。

  III。

  TheliterarysituationwhichconfrontedmewhenIcametoBostonwas,then,asnativeascouldwellbe;andwhatevervalueImaybeabletogiveapersonalstudyofitwillbefromtheeffectitmadeuponmeasonestrangeineverythingbutsympathy。IwillnotpretendthatIsawitinitsentirety,andIhavenohopeofpresentinganythinglikeakinetoscopicimpressionofit。WhatIcandoistogivehereandthereaglimpseofit;andIshallwishthereadertokeepinmindthefactthatitwasina\"stateoftransition,\"aseverythingisalwaysandeverywhere。Itwasnosoonerrecognizablynativethanitceasedtobefullyso;andIbecameawitnessofitafterthechangehadbegun。ThepublishinghousewhichsolongembodiedNewEnglandliteraturewasalreadyattemptingenterprisesoutofthelineofitstraditions,andoneofthesehadbroughtMr。T。B。AldrichfromNewYork,afewweeksbeforeIarriveduponthesceneinthatdramaticqualitywhichIthinkneverimpressedanyonebutMr。Bowles。Mr。Aldrichwastheeditorof’EverySaturday’whenIcametobeassistanteditoroftheAtlanticMonthly。

  Wewereofnearlythesameage,buthehadadistinctanddistinguishedpriorityofreputation,insomuchthatinmyWesternremotenessIhadalwaysrangedhimwithsucheldersandbettersofmineasHolmesandLowell,andneverimaginedhimtheblond,slightyouthIfoundhim,witheveryimaginablecharmofcontemporaneity。ItisnopartoftheofficewhichIhaveintendedfortheseslightandsufficientlywanderingglimpsesofthepasttoshowanywriterinhisfinalplace;andaboveallIdonotpresumetoassignanylivingmanhisrankorstation。ButI

  shouldbefalsetomyowngratefulsenseofbeautyintheworkofthispoetifIdidnotatalltimesrecognizehisconstancytoanidealwhichhisnamestandsfor。Heisknowninseveralkinds,buttomythinkingheisbestinacertainnoblerkindofpoetry;aserioussortinwhichthethoughtholdshimabovethescrupulositiesofthearthelovesandhonorssomuch。Sometimesthefileslipsinhishold,asthefilemustandwill;itisbutaninstrumentatthebest;butthereisnomistouchinthehandthatlaysitselfuponthereader’sheartwiththepulseofthepoet’sheartquickandtrueinit。Therearesonnetsofhis,grave,andsimple,andlofty,whichIthinkofwiththeglowandthrillpossibleonlyfromverybeautifulpoetry,andwhichimpartsuchanemotionaswecanfeelonly\"WhenagreatthoughtstrikesalongthebrainAndflushesallthecheek。\"

  WhenIhadthefortunetomeethimfirst,Isupposethatintheemployofthekindlyhousewewerebothsoeagertoserve,ourdignitieswereaboutthesame;forifthe’AtlanticMonthly’wasasomewhatprouderaffairthananeclecticweeklylike’EverySaturday’,hewassupremeinhisplace,andIwassubordinateinmine。Thehousewascareful,intheattitudeofitsseniorpartner,nottodistinguishbetweenus,andwewerenotslowtoperceivethetactusedinmanagingus;wehadourownjokeofit;wecomparednotestofindwhetherwewereequallyusedinthisthingorthat;andwepromptlysharedthefunofourdiscoverywithFieldshimself。

  Wehadanotherimpartialfriend(nolessafriendofjoyinthelifewhichseemstohavebeenprettynearlyalljoy,asIlookbackuponit)

  inthepartnerwhobecameafterwardstheheadofthehouse,andwhoforecastinhisboldenterprisesthechangefromaNewEnglandtoanAmericanliterarysituation。IntheendJamesR。Osgoodfailed,thoughallhisenterprisessucceeded。Theanomalyissad,butitisnotinfrequent。Theyweregreaterthanhispowersandhismeans,andbeforetheycouldreachtheirfullfruition,theyhadtobeenlargedtomenoflongerpurseandlongerpatience。Hewassingularlyfittedbothbyinstinctandbyeducationtobecomeagreatpublisher;andheearlyperceivedthatifaleadingAmericanhouseweretocontinueatBoston,itmustbehospitabletothetalentsofthewholecountry。Hefoundedhisfutureuponthosegenerouslines;buthewantedthequalitiesaswellastheresourcesforrearingthesuperstructure。Changesbegantofolloweachotherrapidlyafterhecameintocontrolofthehouse。Misfortunereducedthesizeandnumberofitsperiodicals。’TheYoungFolks’wassoldoutright,andthe’NorthAmericanReview’(longbeforeMr。RiceboughtitandcarriedittoNewYork)wascutdownone—half,sothatAldrichsaid,itlookedasifDestinyhadsatuponit。Hisownperiodical,’EverySaturday’,wasfirstenlargedtoastatelyquartoandillustrated;andthen,understressofthecalamitiesfollowingthegreatBostonfire,Itcollapsedtoitsformersize。Thenboththe’AtlanticMonthly’and’EverySaturday’weresoldawayfromtheiroldownership,and’EverySaturday’wassuppressedaltogether,andwetwoceasedtobeofthesameemploy。Therewassomesortofeveningrite(morefunerealthanfestive)thedayaftertheyweresold,andwefollowedOsgoodawayfromit,underthelamps。Weallknewthatitwashisnecessitythathadcausedhimtopartwiththeperiodicals;butheprofessedthatitwashispleasure,andhesaidhehadnotfeltsolight—heartedsincehewasaboy。Weaskedhim,Howcouldhefeelgaywhenhewasnolongerpayingusoursalaries,andhowcouldhejustifyittohisconscience?Helikedourmocking,andlimpedawayfromuswitharheumaticeasingofhisweightfromonefoottoanother:afigurepatheticnowthatithasgonethewaytodustydeath,anddeartomemorythroughbenefactionsunalloyedbyoneunkindness。

  IV。

  ButwhenIcametoBostonearlyin1866,the’AtlanticMonthly’and’Harper’s’thendividedourmagazineworldbetweenthem;the’NorthAmericanReview’,inthecontrolofLowellandProfessorNorton,hadentereduponanewlife;’EverySaturday’wasaninstantsuccessinthechargeofMr。Aldrich,whowasbytasteandtrainingoneofthebesteditors;and’OurYoungFolks’hadthefieldofjuvenileperiodicalliteraturetoitself。

  ItwasunderthedirectionofMissLucyLarcomandofMr。J。T。

  Trowbridge,whohadcomefromwesternNewYork,wherehewasborn,andmustbenotedasoneofthefirstreturnersfromthesettingtotherisingsun。HenaturalizedhimselfinBostoninhislaterboyhood,andhestillbreathesBostonair,wherehedwellsinthestreetcalledPleasant,ontheshoreofSpyPond,atArlington,andstillweavesthemagicwebofhissatisfyingstoriesforboys。HemergesintheirpopularitythefameofapoetwhichIdonotthinkwillalwayssufferthateclipse,forhispoemsshowhimtohavelookeddeeplyintotheheartofcommonhumanity,withatrueandtendersenseofit。

  MissLarcomscarcelyseemedtochangefromdatetodateinthegenerationthatelapsedbetweenthetimeIfirstsawherandthetimeIsawherlast,ayearortwobeforeherdeath。Agoodnesslookedoutofhercomelyface,whichmademethinkoftheMadonna’sinTitian’s\"Assumption,\"andherwholeaspectexpressedamildandfriendlyspiritwhichIfindithardtoputinwords。Shewasneverofthefineworldofliterature;shedweltwhereshewasborn,inthatunfashionableBeverlywhichisnotBeverlyFarms,andwasofasimple,sea—faring,God—fearingrace,asshehastoldinoneoftheloveliestautobiographiesIknow,\"ANewEnglandGirlhood。\"Shewastheauthorofmanypoems,whosenumbersheconstantlyenlarged,butshewaschiefly,andwillbemostlastingly,famedfortheonepoem,’HannahBindingShoes’,whichyearsbeforemydaysinBostonhadmadehersowidelyknown。Sheneveragainstrucksodeeporsotrueanote;butifonehaslodgedsuchanoteintheearoftime,itisenough;andifwearetospeakofeternity,onemightverywellholdupone’sheadinthefieldsofasphodel,ifonecouldsaytothegreatothersthere,\"IwroteHannahBindingShoes。\"Herpoemisvery,verysad,asallwhohavereaditwillremember;butMissLarcomherselfwasaboveeverythingcheerful,andshehadalaughofmellowrichnesswhichwillinglymadeitselfheard。ShewasnotonlyoftrueNewEnglandstock,andaBostonauthorbyrightofrace,butshecameuptothatcityeverywinterfromhernativetown。

  Bythesamerightandonthesameterms,anotherNewEnglandpoetess,whomImetthosefirstdaysinBoston,wasaBostonauthor。WhenIsawCeliaThaxtershewasjustbeginningtomakehereffectwiththosepoemsandsketcheswhichtheseasingsandflashesthroughasitsingsandflashesaroundtheIslesofShoals,hersummerhome,wherehergirlhoodhadbeenpassedinafreedomaswildasthecurlew’s。Shewasamostbeautifulcreature,stillveryyoung,withaslenderfigure,andanexquisiteperfectionoffeature;shewasinpresencewhatherworkwas:

  fine,frank,finished。Idonotknowwhetherotherwitnessesofourliteraryhistoryfeelthatthepublichasfailedtokeepherasfullyinmindasherworkmerited;butIdonotthinktherecanbeanydoubtbutourliteraturewouldbesensiblythepoorerwithoutherwork。Itisinterestingtorememberhowcloselyshekepttohernativefield,anditiswonderfultoconsiderhowrichlyshemadethosesea—beatenrockstoblossom。Somethingstrangelyfullandbrightcametoherversefromthemysticalenvironmentoftheocean,liketheluxuryofleafandtintthatitgavethenarrowerflower—plotsofhernativeisles。Hergift,indeed,couldnotsatisfyitselfwiththetermsofoneartalone,howevervaried,andshelearnedtoexpressincolorthethoughtsandfeelingsimpatientofthepallorofwords。

  SheremainsinmymemoriesofthatfarBostonadistinctandvividpersonality;astheauthoressof’AmberGods’,and’InaCellar’,and’Circumstance’,andthoseotherwildromantictales,remainsthegentleandsomewhatevanescentpresenceIfoundher。MissPrescottwasnowMrs。

  Spofford,andherhusbandwasarisingyoungpoliticianoftheday。ItwashisdutiesasmemberoftheGeneralCourtthathadbroughtthemupfromNewburyporttoBostonforthatfirstwinter;andIrememberthattheeveningwhenwemethewastalkingoftheirsometimegoingtoItalythatshemightstudyforimaginativeliteraturecertainItaliancitieshenamed。Ihavelongsinceceasedtoownthosecities,butatthemomentI

  feltapangofexpropriationwhichIconcealedaswellasIcould;andnowIheartilywishshecouldhavefulfilledthatpurposeifitwasapurpose,orrealizedthatdreamifitwasonlyadream。Perhaps,however,thatsumptuousandglowingfancyofhers,whichhadtakenthefancyoftheyoungreadersofthatday,neededthecoldNewEnglandbackgroundtobringoutallitsintensitiesoftint,allitssplendorsoflight。Itseffectsweresuchascouldnotlast,orcouldnotbefartherevolved;theyweretheexpressionofyouthmusingawayfromitsenvironmentandsmittenwiththegloriesofaworldafarandbeyond,thegreatworld,thefineworld,theimpurpledworldofromanticmotivesandpassions。Butforwhattheywere,Icanneverthinkthemotherthanwhattheyappeared:theemanationsofararelygiftedandsingularlypoeticmind。IfeelbetterthanIcansayhownecessarilytheyweretheemanationsofaNewEnglandmind,andhowtothesubtlersensetheymustimpartthepathosofrevoltfromthecolorlessrigiditieswhicharethelongresultofpuritanisminthephysiognomyofNewEnglandlife。

  Theirauthorafterwardsgaveherselftothestricterstudyofthislifeinmanytalesandsketcheswhichshowedanincreasingmastery;buttheycouldnothavetheflush,thesurprise,thedelightofayoungtalenttryingitselfinakindnativeand,sofarasIknow,peculiartoit。

  FromtimetotimeIstillcomeuponapoemofherswhichrecallsthatearlierstrainofmusic,ofcolor,andIamcontenttotrustitformyabidingfaithinthecharmofthingsIhavenotreadforthirtyyears。

  V。

  Ispeakofthisoneandthat,asithappens,andwithnothoughtofgivingacompleteprospectofliteraryBostonthirtyyearsago。IamawarethatitwillseemsparselypeopledintheeffectIimpart,andI

  wouldhavethereaderalwayskeepinmindthegreatfamesatCambridgeandatConcord,whichformedsolargeapartofthecelebrityofBoston。

  Iwouldalsolikehimtothinkofitasstillagreattown,merely,whereeveryonekneweveryoneelse,andwhosemetropolitanliberationfromneighborhoodwasjustbegun。

  MostdistinctlyofthatyetuncitifiedBostonwasthecriticEdwinP。

  Whipple,whosesympathieswereindefinitelywiderthanhistraditions。

  Hewasamostgenerousloverofallthatwasexcellentinliterature;andthoughIsupposeweshouldcallhimanold—fashionedcriticnow,I

  suspectitwouldbewithnodistinctsenseofwhatisnewerfashioned。

  Hewascertainlyasfriendlytowhatpromisedwellintheyoungermenashewastowhatwasdonewellintheirelders;andtherewasnoonewritinginhisdaywhosevirtuesfailedofhisrecognition,thoughitmighthappenthathisfoibleswouldescapeWhipple’scensure。Hewrotestrenuouslyandofcourseconscientiously;hispointofviewwassolelyandalwaysthatwhichenabledhimbesttodiscernqualities。Idoubtifhehadanytheoryofcriticismexcepttofindoutwhatwasgoodinanauthorandpraiseit;andheratherblamedwhatwasethicallybadthanwhatwasaestheticallybad。InthishewasstrictlyofNewEngland,andhewasofNewEnglandinacertaingeneralintelligence,whichconstantlygrewwithaninterrogativehabitofmind。

  Helikedtotalktoyouofwhathehadfoundcharacteristicinyourwork,toanalyzeyoutoyourself;andtheverymodestyoftheman,whichmadesuchastudyimpersonalasfarashewasconcerned,sometimesrenderedhiminsensibletothesufferingsofhissubject。Hehadakeenperceptionofhumorinothers,buthehadverylittlehumor;hehadaloveofthebeautifulinliteraturewhichwasperhapssometimesgreaterthanhissenseofit。

  Iwritefromacursoryacquaintancewithhiswork,notrecentlyrenewed。

  OfthepresenceofthemanIhaveavividerremembrance:aslight,short,ecclesiasticizedfigureinblack;withawhiteneckclothandasilkhatofstrictdecorum,andbetweenthetwoasquarefacewithsquarefeatures,intensifiedintheirregardbyapairofverylargeglasses,andtheprominent,myopiceyesstaringthroughthem。Hewasatypeofout—datedNewEnglandscholarshipintheseaspects,butinthehospitablequalitiesofhismindandheart,thesortofmantobekeptfondlyinthememoryofallwhoeverknewhim。

  Outofthevagueofthatfar—offtimeanotherfaceandfigure,asessentiallyNewEn&landasthis,andyetsodifferent,relievethemselves。CharlesF。Browne,whosedrollerywaftedhispseudonymasfarastheEnglishspeechcouldcarrylaughter,wasaWesternizedYankee。

  HeaddedanOhiowayoftalkingtotheMainewayofthinking,andhesobecamealiteraryproductofararerandstrangersortthanourliteraturehadotherwiseknown。HehadgonefromClevelandtoLondon,withintervalsofNewYorkandthelectureplatform,fourorfiveyearsbeforeIsawhiminBoston,shortlyafterIwentthere。WehadmetinOhio,andhehadpersonallyexplainedtometheducatlesswell—meaningofVanityFairinNewYork;butmanymenhadsinceshakenthewearyhandofArtemusWardwhenIgraspeditonedayinfrontoftheTremontTemple。

  Hedidnotrecognizeme,buthegavemeatonceagreetingofgreatimpersonalcordiality,with\"Howdoyoudo?Whendidyoucome?\"andotherquestionsthathadnoconcerninthem,tillIbegantodawnuponhimthroughacloudofotherhalfrememberedfaces。Thenheseizedmyhandandwrungitalloveragain,andrepeatedhisfriendlydemandswithanintonationthatwasnow\"Why,howareyou;howareyou?\"formealone。

  Itwasabitofcomedy,whichhadthefitpatheticreliefofhisimpendingdoom:thiswasalreadystampeduponhiswastedface,andhisgayeyeshadthedeath—look。Hislarge,loosemouthwasdrawn,forallitslaughteratthefactwhichheowned;hisprofile,whichburlesqued。

  aneagle’s,wastheprofileofadroopingeagle;hislanklengthoflimbtrembledawaywithhimwhenweparted。Ididnotseehimagain;

  IscarcelyheardofhimtillIheardofhisdeath,andthissadimageremainswithmeofthehumoristwhofirstgavetheworldatasteofthehumorwhichcharacterizesthewholeAmericanpeople。

  Iwasmeetingallkindsofdistinguishedpersons,inmyrelationtothemagazine,andearlythatwinterImetonewhoremainsinmymindaboveallothersapersonofdistinction。Hewasscarcelyacelebrity,butheembodiedcertainsocialtraitswhichweresocharacteristicofliteraryBostonthatitcouldnotbeapproachedwithouttheirrecognition。

  TheMuseshaveoftenbeenacknowledgedtobeveryniceyoungpersons,butinBostontheywerereallyladies;inBostonliteraturewasofgoodfamilyandgoodsocietyinameasureithasneverbeenelsewhere。

  ItmightbesaideventhatreformwasofgoodfamilyinBoston;

  andliteratureandreformequallysharedtheregardofEdmundQuincy,whoseracewasoneofthemostaristocraticinNewEngland。Ihadknownhimbyhisnovelof’Wensley’(itcamesonearbeingafirst—ratenovel),andbyhisLifeofJosiahQuincy,thenanewbook,butstillbetterbyhisBostonletterstotheNewYorkTribune。Thesedealtfrankly,intheoldanti—slaverydaysbetween1850and1860,withotherpersonsofdistinctioninBoston,whodidnotseetherightsoclearlyasQuincydid,orwhoatleastlettheirinterestsdarkenthemtotheuglinessofslavery。Theirfaultwasallthemorecomicalbecauseitwastheerrorofmenotherwisesocorrect,ofcharacterssostainless,ofnaturessoupright;andtheQuincylettersgotoutofitallthefuntherewasinit。QuincyhimselfaffectedmeasthefinestpatriciantypeIhadevermet。Hewascharminglyhandsome,withanoseofmostfitaquilinity,smooth—shavenlips,\"educatedwhiskers,\"andperfectglasses;hismannerwasbeautiful,hisvoicedelightful,whenatourfirstmeetinghemademehisreproachesintermsoflovelykindnessforhavingusedinmy’VenetianLife’theBriticism’directly’for’assoonas。’

  LowelloncetoldmethatQuincyhadneverhadanycallingorprofession,becausewhenhefoundhimselfintheenjoymentofamoderateincomeonleavingcollege,hedecidedtobesimplyagentleman。Hewastoomuchofamantobemerelythat,andhewasanabolitionist,ajournalist,andforconscience’sakeasatirist。OfthatpoliticalmoodofsocietywhichhesatirizedwasaneminentmanwhomitwasalsomygoodfortunetomeetinmyearlydaysinBoston;andifhisgreatsweetnessandkindnesshadnotinstantlywonmyliking,IshouldstillhavebeengladoftheglimpseoftheolderandstatelierBostonwhichmyslightacquaintancewithGeorgeTicknorgaveme。ThehistorianofSpanishliterature,thefriendandbiographerofPrescott,andaleadingfigureoftheintellectualsocietyofanepochalreadyclosed,dweltinthefineoldsquarebrickmansionwhichyetstandsatthecornerofParkStreetandBeacon,thoughsunknowtoavarietyofbusinessuses,andlamentablychangedinaspect。

点击下载App,搜索"Literary Boston As I Knew It",免费读到尾