第67章
加入书架 A- A+
点击下载App,搜索"The Varieties of Religious Experience",免费读到尾

  Inthecourseofalltheseyearsheneverraisedhishood,nomatterwhattheardorofthesunortherain’sstrength。Heneverputonashoe。Heworeagarmentofcoarsesackcloth,withnothingelseuponhisskin。Thisgarmentwasasscantaspossible,andoveritalittlecloakofthesamestuff。Whenthecoldwasgreathetookoffthecloakandopenedforawhilethedoorandlittlewindowofhiscell。Thenheclosedthemandresumedthemantle——hisway,ashetoldus,ofwarminghimself,andmakinghisbodyfeelabettertemperature。Itwasafrequentthingwithhimtoeatonceonlyinthreedays;andwhenI

  expressedmysurprise,hesaidthatitwasveryeasyifoneoncehadacquiredthehabit。Oneofhiscompanionshasassuredmethathehasgonesometimeseightdayswithoutfood……Hispovertywasextreme;andhismortification,eveninhisyouth,wassuchthathetoldmehehadpassedthreeyearsinahouseofhisorderwithoutknowinganyofthemonksotherwisethanbythesoundoftheirvoice,forheneverraisedhiseyes,andonlyfoundhiswayaboutbyfollowingtheothers。Heshowedthissamemodestyonpublichighways。Hespentmanyyearswithouteverlayingeyesuponawoman;butheconfessedtomethatattheagehehadreacheditwasindifferenttohimwhetherhelaideyesonthemornot。HewasveryoldwhenIfirstcametoknowhim,andhisbodysoattenuatedthatitseemedformedofnothingsomuchasofsomanyrootsoftrees。Withallthissanctityhewasveryaffable。Heneverspokeunlesshewasquestioned,buthisintellectualright-mindednessandgracegavetoallhiswordsanirresistiblecharm。”

  F。MaxMuller:Ramakrishna,hisLifeandsayings,1899,p。

  Oldenberg:Buddha;translatedbyW。Hoey,London,1882,p。

  Wefindaccordinglythatasasceticsaintshavegrownolder,anddirectorsofconsciencemoreexperienced,theyusuallyhaveshownatendencytolaylessstressonspecialbodilymortifications。

  Catholicteachershavealwaysprofessedtherulethat,sincehealthisneededforefficiencyinGod’sservice,healthmustnotbesacrificedtomortification。Thegeneraloptimismandhealthy-mindednessofliberalProtestantcirclesto-daymakesmortificationformortification’ssakerepugnanttous。Wecannolongersympathizewithcrueldeities,andthenotionthatGodcantakedelightinthespectacleofsufferingsself-inflictedinhishonorisabhorrent。Inconsequenceofallthesemotivesyouprobablyaredisposed,unlesssomespecialutilitycanbeshowninsomeindividual’sdiscipline,totreatthegeneraltendencytoasceticismaspathological。

  YetIbelievethatamorecarefulconsiderationofthewholematter,distinguishingbetweenthegeneralgoodintentionofasceticismandtheuselessnessofsomeoftheparticularactsofwhichitmaybeguilty,oughttorehabilitateitinouresteem。

  Forinitsspiritualmeaningasceticismstandsfornothinglessthanfortheessenceofthetwice-bornphilosophy。Itsymbolizes,lamelyenoughnodoubt,butsincerely,thebeliefthatthereisanelementofrealwrongnessinthisworld,whichisneithertobeignorednorevaded,butwhichmustbesquarelymetandovercomebyanappealtothesoul’sheroicresources,andneutralizedandcleansedawaybysuffering。Asagainstthisview,theultra-optimisticformoftheonce-bornphilosophythinkswemaytreatevilbythemethodofignoring。Letamanwho,byfortunatehealthandcircumstances,escapesthesufferingofanygreatamountofevilinhisownperson,alsoclosehiseyestoitasitexistsinthewideruniverseoutsidehisprivateexperience,andhewillbequitofitaltogether,andcansailthroughlifehappilyonahealthy-mindedbasis。Butwesawinourlecturesonmelancholyhowprecariousthisattemptnecessarilyis。Moreoveritisbutfortheindividual;andleavestheeviloutsideofhim,unredeemedandunprovidedforinhisphilosophy。

  NosuchattemptcanbeaGENERALsolutionoftheproblem;andtomindsofsombretinge,whonaturallyfeellifeasatragicmystery,suchoptimismisashallowdodgeormeanevasion。Itaccepts,inlieuofarealdeliverance,whatisaluckypersonalaccidentmerely,acrannytoescapeby。ItleavesthegeneralworldunhelpedandstillintheclutchofSatan。Therealdeliverance,thetwice-bornfolkinsist,mustbeofuniversalapplication。Painandwronganddeathmustbefairlymetandovercomeinhigherexcitement,orelsetheirstingremainsessentiallyunbroken。Ifonehasevertakenthefactoftheprevalenceoftragicdeathinthisworld’shistoryfairlyintohismind——freezing,drowningentombmentalive,wildbeasts,worsemen,andhideousdiseases——hecanwithdifficulty,itseemstome,continuehisowncareerofworldlyprosperitywithoutsuspectingthathemayallthewhilenotbereallyinsidethegame,thathemaylackthegreatinitiation。

  Well,thisisexactlywhatasceticismthinks;anditvoluntarilytakestheinitiation。Lifeisneitherfarcenorgenteelcomedy,itsays,butsomethingwemustsitatinmourninggarments,hopingitsbittertastewillpurgeusofourfolly。Thewildandtheheroicareindeedsuchrootedpartsofitthathealthy-mindednesspureandsimple,withitssentimentaloptimism,canhardlyberegardedbyanythinkingmanasaserioussolution。Phrasesofneatness,cosiness,andcomfortcanneverbeananswertothesphinx’sriddle。

  IntheseremarksIamleaningonlyuponmankind’scommoninstinctforreality,whichinpointoffacthasalwaysheldtheworldtobeessentiallyatheatreforheroism。Inheroism,wefeel,life’ssuprememysteryishidden。Wetoleratenoonewhohasnocapacitywhateverforitinanydirection。Ontheotherhand,nomatterwhataman’sfrailtiesotherwisemaybe,ifhebewillingtoriskdeath,andstillmoreifhesufferitheroically,intheservicehehaschosen,thefactconsecrateshimforever。

  Inferiortoourselvesinthisorthatway,ifyetweclingtolife,andheisable“toflingitawaylikeaflower“ascaringnothingforit,weaccounthiminthedeepestwayourbornsuperior。Eachofusinhisownpersonfeelsthatahigh-heartedindifferencetolifewouldexpiateallhisshortcomings。

  Themetaphysicalmystery,thusrecognizedbycommonsense,thathewhofeedsondeaththatfeedsonmenpossesseslifesupereminentlyandexcellently,andmeetsbestthesecretdemandsoftheuniverse,isthetruthofwhichasceticismhasbeenthefaithfulchampion。Thefollyofthecross,soinexplicablebytheintellect,hasyetitsindestructiblevitalmeaning。

  Representatively,then,andsymbolically,andapartfromthevagariesintowhichtheunenlightenedintellectofformertimesmayhaveletitwander,asceticismmust,Ibelieve,beacknowledgedtogowiththeprofounderwayofhandlingthegiftofexistence。Naturalisticoptimismismeresyllabubandflatteryandsponge-cakeincomparison。Thepracticalcourseofactionforus,asreligiousmen,wouldtherefore,itseemstome,notbesimplytoturnourbacksupontheasceticimpulse,asmostofusto-dayturnthem,butrathertodiscoversomeoutletforitofwhichthefruitsinthewayofprivationandhardshipmightbeobjectivelyuseful。Theoldermonasticasceticismoccupieditselfwithpatheticfutilities,orterminatedinthemereegotismoftheindividual,increasinghisownperfection。[219]

  Butisitnotpossibleforustodiscardmostoftheseolderformsofmortification,andyetfindsanerchannelsfortheheroismwhichinspiredthem?

  “Thevanitiesofallothersmaydieout,butthevanityofasaintasregardshissainthoodishardindeedtowearaway。”

  RamakrishnahisLifeandSayings,1899,p。172。

  Doesnot,forexample,theworshipofmaterialluxuryandwealth,whichconstitutessolargeaportionofthe“spirit“ofourage,makesomewhatforeffeminacyandunmanliness?Isnottheexclusivelysympatheticandfacetiouswayinwhichmostchildrenarebroughtupto-day——sodifferentfromtheeducationofahundredyearsago,especiallyinevangelicalcircles——indanger,inspiteofitsmanyadvantages,ofdevelopingacertaintrashinessoffibre?Aretherenothereaboutssomepointsofapplicationforarenovatedandrevisedasceticdiscipline?

  Manyofyouwouldrecognizesuchdangers,butwouldpointtoathletics,militarism,andindividualandnationalenterpriseandadventureastheremedies。Thesecontemporaryidealsarequiteasremarkablefortheenergywithwhichtheymakeforheroicstandardsoflife,ascontemporaryreligionisremarkableforthewayinwhichitneglectsthem。[220]Warandadventureassuredlykeepallwhoengageinthemfromtreatingthemselvestootenderly。Theydemandsuchincredibleefforts,depthbeyonddepthofexertion,bothindegreeandinduration,thatthewholescaleofmotivationalters。Discomfortandannoyance,hungerandwet,painandcold,squalorandfilth,ceasetohaveanydeterrentoperationwhatever。Deathturnsintoacommonplacematter,anditsusualpowertocheckouractionvanishes。Withtheannullingofthesecustomaryinhibitions,rangesofnewenergyaresetfree,andlifeseemscastuponahigherplaneofpower。

  “Whenachurchhastoberunbyoysters,ice-cream,andfun。”IreadinanAmericanreligiouspaper,“youmaybesurethatitisrunningawayfromChrist。”Such,ifonemayjudgebyappearances,isthepresentplightofmanyofourchurches。

  Thebeautyofwarinthisrespectisthatitissocongruouswithordinaryhumannature。Ancestralevolutionhasmadeusallpotentialwarriors;sothemostinsignificantindividual,whenthrownintoanarmyinthefield,isweanedfromwhateverexcessoftendernesstowardhispreciouspersonhemaybringwithhim,andmayeasilydevelopintoamonsterofinsensibility。

  Butwhenwecomparethemilitarytypeofself-severitywiththatoftheasceticsaint,wefindaworld-widedifferenceinalltheirspiritualconcomitants。

  “’Liveandletlive,’“writesaclear-headedAustrianofficer,“isnodeviceforanarmy。Contemptforone’sowncomrades,forthetroopsoftheenemy,and,aboveall,fiercecontemptforone’sownperson,arewhatwardemandsofeveryone。Farbetterisitforanarmytobetoosavage,toocruel,toobarbarous,thantopossesstoomuchsentimentalityandhumanreasonableness。

  Ifthesoldieristobegoodforanythingasasoldier,hemustbeexactlytheoppositeofareasoningandthinkingman。Themeasureofgoodnessinhimishispossibleuseinwar。War,andevenpeace,requireofthesoldierabsolutelypeculiarstandardsofmorality。Therecruitbringswithhimcommonmoralnotions,ofwhichhemustseekimmediatelytogetrid。Forhimvictory,success,mustbeEVERYTHING。Themostbarbarictendenciesinmencometolifeagaininwar,andforwar’susestheyareincommensurablygood。”Friedens-undKriegs-moralderHeere。QuotedbyHamon:PsychologieduMilitaireprofessional,1895,p。xli。

  Thesewordsareofcourseliterallytrue。Theimmediateaimofthesoldier’slifeis,asMoltkesaid,destruction,andnothingbutdestruction;andwhateverconstructionswarsresultinareremoteandnon-military。Consequentlythesoldiercannottrainhimselftobetoofeelinglesstoallthoseusualsympathiesandrespects,whetherforpersonsorforthings,thatmakeforconservation。Yetthefactremainsthatwarisaschoolofstrenuouslifeandheroism;and,beinginthelineofaboriginalinstinct,istheonlyschoolthatasyetisuniversallyavailable。Butwhenwegravelyaskourselveswhetherthiswholesaleorganizationofirrationalityandcrimebeouronlybulwarkagainsteffeminacy,westandaghastatthethought,andthinkmorekindlyofasceticreligion。Onehearsofthemechanicalequivalentofheat。Whatwenowneedtodiscoverinthesocialrealmisthemoralequivalentofwar:somethingheroicthatwillspeaktomenasuniversallyaswardoes,andyetwillbeascompatiblewiththeirspiritualselvesaswarhasproveditselftobeincompatible。Ihaveoftenthoughtthatintheoldmonkishpoverty-worship,inspiteofthepedantrywhichinfestedit,theremightbesomethinglikethatmoralequivalentofwarwhichweareseeking。Maynotvoluntarilyacceptedpovertybe“thestrenuouslife。”withouttheneedofcrushingweakerpeoples?

  PovertyindeedISthestrenuouslife——withoutbrassbandsoruniformsorhystericpopularapplauseorliesorcircumlocutions;

  andwhenoneseesthewayinwhichwealth-gettingentersasanidealintotheveryboneandmarrowofourgeneration,onewonderswhetherarevivalofthebeliefthatpovertyisaworthyreligiousvocationmaynotbe“thetransformationofmilitarycourage。”andthespiritualreformwhichourtimestandsmostinneedof。

  AmongusEnglish-speakingpeoplesespeciallydothepraisesofpovertyneedoncemoretobeboldlysung。Wehavegrownliterallyafraidtobepoor。Wedespiseanyonewhoelectstobepoorinordertosimplifyandsavehisinnerlife。Ifhedoesnotjointhegeneralscrambleandpantwiththemoney-makingstreet,wedeemhimspiritlessandlackinginambition。Wehavelostthepowerevenofimaginingwhattheancientidealizationofpovertycouldhavemeant:theliberationfrommaterialattachments,theunbribedsoul,themanlierindifference,thepayingourwaybywhatweareordoandnotbywhatwehave,therighttoflingawayourlifeatanymomentirresponsibly——themoreathletictrim,inshort,themoralfightingshape。Whenweoftheso-calledbetterclassesarescaredasmenwereneverscaredinhistoryatmaterialuglinessandhardship;whenweputoffmarriageuntilourhousecanbeartistic,andquakeatthethoughtofhavingachildwithoutabank-accountanddoomedtomanuallabor,itistimeforthinkingmentoprotestagainstsounmanlyandirreligiousastateofopinion。

点击下载App,搜索"The Varieties of Religious Experience",免费读到尾