第6章
加入书架 A- A+
点击下载App,搜索"Introduction to the Metaphysic of Morals",免费读到尾

  Anactioniscalledanact—ormoraldeed—insofarasitissubjecttolawsofobligation,andconsequentlyinsofarasthesubjectofitisregardedwithreferencetothefreedomofhischoiceintheexerciseofhiswill。Theagent—astheactorordoerofthedeed—isregardedas,throughtheact,theauthorofitseffect;

  andthiseffect,alongwiththeactionitself,maybeimputedtohim,ifbepreviouslyknewthelawinvirtueofwhichanobligationresteduponhim。

  Apersonisasubjectwhoiscapableofhavinghisactionsimputedtohim。Moralpersonalityis,therefore,nothingbutthefreedomofarationalbeingundermorallaws;anditistobedistinguishedfrompsychologicalfreedomasthemerefacultybywhichwebecomeconsciousofourselvesindifferentstatesoftheidentityofourexistence。Henceitfollowsthatapersonisproperlysubjecttonootherlawsthanthosehelaysdownforhimself,eitheraloneorinconjunctionwithothers。

  Athingiswhatisincapableofbeingthesubjectofimputation。

  Everyobjectofthefreeactivityofthewill,whichisitselfvoidoffreedom,isthereforecalledathing(rescorporealis)。

  Rightorwrongapplies,asageneralquality,toanact(rectumautminusrectum),insofarasitisinaccordancewithdutyorcontrarytoduty(factumlicitumautillicitum),nomatterwhatmaybethesubjectororiginofthedutyitself。Anactthatiscontrarytodutyiscalledatransgression(reatus)。

  Anunintentionaltransgressionofaduty,whichis,nevertheless,imputabletoaperson,iscalledamerefault(culpa)。Anintentionaltransgression—thatis,anactaccompaniedwiththeconsciousnessthatitisatransgression—constitutesacrime(dolus)。

  Whateverisjuridicallyinaccordancewithexternallawsissaidtobejust(jus,instum);andwhateverisnotjuridicallyinaccordancewithexternallawsisunjust(unjustum)。

  Acollisionofdutiesorobligations(collisioofficiorums。

  obligationum)wouldbetheresultofsucharelationbetweenthemthattheonewouldannultheother,inwholeorinpart。Dutyandobligation,however,areconceptionswhichexpresstheobjectivepracticalnecessityofcertainactions,andtwooppositerulescannotbeobjectiveandnecessaryatthesametime;forifitisadutytoactaccordingtooneofthem,itisnotonlynodutytoactaccordingtoanoppositerule,buttodosowouldevenbecontrarytoduty。Henceacollisionofdutiesandobligationsisentirelyinconceivable(obligationesnoncolliduntur)。Theremay,however,betwogroundsofobligation(rationesobligandi),connectedwithanindividualunderaruleprescribedforhimself,andyetneithertheonenortheothermaybesufficienttoconstituteanactualobligation(rationesobligandinonobligantes);andinthatcasetheoneofthemisnotaduty。Iftwosuchgroundsofobligationareactuallyincollisionwitheachother,practicalphilosophydoesnotsaythatthestrongerobligationistokeeptheupperhand(fortiorobligatiovincit),butthatthestrongergroundofobligationistomaintainitsplace(fortiorobligandiratiovincit)。

  ObligatoryLawsforwhichanexternallegislationispossiblearecalledgenerallyexternallaws。Thoseexternallaws,theobligatorinessofwhichcanberecognisedbyreasonapriorievenwithoutanexternallegislation,arecallednaturallaws。Thoselaws,again,whicharenotobligatorywithoutactualexternallegislation,arecalledpositivelaws。Anexternallegislation,containingpurenaturallaws,isthereforeconceivable;butinthatcaseapreviousnaturallawmustbepresupposedtoestablishtheauthorityofthelawgiverbytherighttosubjectotherstoobligationthroughhisownactofwill。

  Theprinciplewhichmakesacertainactionadutyisapracticallaw。Theruleoftheagentoractor,whichheformsasaprincipleforhimselfonsubjectivegrounds,iscalledhismaxim。Hence,evenwhenthelawisoneandinvariable,themaximsoftheagentmayyetbeverydifferent。

  Thecategoricalimperativeonlyexpressesgenerallywhatconstitutesobligation。Itmayberenderedbythefollowingformula:\"Actaccordingtoamaximwhichcanbeadoptedatthesametimeasauniversallaw。\"Actionsmustthereforebeconsidered,inthefirstplace,accordingtotheirsubjectiveprinciple;butwhetherthisprincipleisalsovalidobjectivelycanonlybeknownbythecriterionofthecategoricalimperative。Forreasonbringstheprincipleormaximofanyactiontothetest,bycallingupontheagenttothinkofhimselfinconnectionwithitasatthesametimelayingdownauniversallaw,andtoconsiderwhetherhisactionissoqualifiedastobefitforenteringintosuchauniversallegislation。

  Thesimplicityofthislaw,incomparisonwiththegreatandmanifoldconsequenceswhichmaybedrawnfromit,aswellasitscommandingauthorityandsupremacywithouttheaccompanimentofanyvisiblemotiveorsanction,mustcertainlyatfirstappearverysurprising。Andwemaywellwonderatthepowerofourreasontodeterminetheactivityofthewillbythemereideaofthequalificationofamaximfortheuniversalityofapracticallaw,especiallywhenwearetaughttherebythatthispracticalmorallawfirstrevealsapropertyofthewillwhichthespeculativereasonwouldneverhavecomeuponeitherbyprinciplesapriori,orfromanyexperiencewhatever;andevenifithadascertainedthefact,itcouldneverhavetheoreticallyestablisheditspossibility。Thispracticallaw,however,notonlydiscoversthefactofthatpropertyofthewill,whichisfreedom,butirrefutablyestablishesit。Henceitwillbelesssurprisingtofindthatthemorallawsareundemonstrable,andyetapodeictic,likethemathematicalpostulates;andthatthey,atthesametime,openupbeforeusawholefieldofpracticalknowledge,fromwhichreason,onitstheoreticalside,mustfinditselfentirelyexcludedwithitsspeculativeideaoffreedomandallsuchideasofthesupersensiblegenerally。

  Theconformityofanactiontothelawofdutyconstitutesitslegality;theconformityofthemaximoftheactionwiththelawconstitutesitsmorality。Amaximisthusasubjectiveprincipleofaction,whichtheindividualmakesaruleforhimselfastohowinfacthewillact。

  Ontheotherhand,theprincipleofdutyiswhatreasonabsolutely,andthereforeobjectivelyanduniversally,laysdownintheformofacommandtotheindividual,astohowheoughttoact。

  Thesupremeprincipleofthescienceofmoralsaccordinglyisthis:\"Actaccordingtoamaximwhichcanlikewisebevalidasauniversallaw。\"EverymaximwhichisnotqualifiedaccordingtothisconditioniscontrarytoMorality。

  Lawsarisefromthewill,viewedgenerallyaspracticalreason;

  maximsspringfromtheactivityofthewillintheprocessofchoice。Thelatterinmaniswhatconstitutesfree—will。Thewillwhichreferstonothingelsethanmerelawcanneitherbecalledfreenornotfree,becauseitdoesnotrelatetoactionsimmediately,buttothegivingofalawforthemaximofactions;itisthereforethepracticalreasonitself。Henceasafaculty,itisabsolutelynecessaryinitself,andisnotsubjecttoanyexternalnecessitation。Itis,therefore,onlytheactofchoiceinthevoluntaryprocessthatcanbecalledfree。

点击下载App,搜索"Introduction to the Metaphysic of Morals",免费读到尾