第5章
加入书架 A- A+
点击下载App,搜索"An Essay on the Distribution of Wealth",免费读到尾

  veryaccuratelycorresponded。Thosesubordinaterightsofthepeopletotemporarypossessionwhichhavegrownupin

  peacefultimes,haveeverremainedprecariousandimperfect:buttherightoftheruleristherightofthestrongest;and

  wheneitherintestinewarsorforeigninvasionhavebroughtanewmastertoadistrict,hisswordhasrestoredthesovereign\'sclaiminallitsprimitiveclearness。Theproportionoftheproducetakenbythesovereign,hasonsomegroundorotherperpetuallyvaried;thatis,whenhehas

  pretendedtoconfinehimselftoanydefiniteproportionatall。Thelawsseemtofixitatone-sixth,butinpractice,thislawor

  rulehasbeenutterlydisregarded。Strabomentions,thatinhistime,,?

  ,wherebystrainingtheGreekalittleeitherway,therentmayappeartohavebeen

  one-fourthorthree-fourthsoftheproduce。TheMogulconquerorsexactedtheirrentsinproportions,whichvaried

  considerablywiththequalityoftheland,moreparticularlywithitscommandofwater。Butnodefiniterateofrenthaseverprevailedlonginpractice。UndertheHindoogovernments,therehadbeenadispositiontoallowmanysubordinateclaimstothepossessionofthesoil,

  andtoofficesconnectedwiththecollectionoftherevenue,tobecomehereditary。Oftheoffices,themostimportantwas

  thatoftheZemindars。Thesewereentrustedwiththecollectionoftherevenueindistrictsofdifferentsizes,wereentitledto

  atenthofitsamount,hadsometimeslandsassignedtothem,andwereendowedwithveryconsiderableauthority。They

  weremuchinthehabitofmakingadvancesofseedandstocktoassistthecultivator,andofstipulatingforrepaymentinthe

  shapeofproduce。Whenthesonhadbeenallowedtosucceedthefatherforsomegenerationsinsuchanoffice,thetiesand

  interestswhichconnectedhimwiththepeopleunderhimweresomanyandstrong,thatthedisplacingaZemindar,unless

  forgrossmisconductorforfailureinpaymentofthesovereign\'srent,wasthoughtbyhimselfandtheryots,tobeanactof

  tyrannicaloppression。Theryotsverygenerallyoccupiedtheirlandsincommon,andwerecollectedintovillagesunder

  officersoftheirown,whodistributedtothecultivatorsandtradesmentheirrespectivesharesoftheproduce。Thevillage

  officesandvarioustradesbecamehereditary。Theryottoohimself,theactualcultivator,wasyetlesslikelythanthesuperior

  officerstobedisturbedinthepossessionofhislands。Providedthesovereign\'sshareoftheproducewaspaid,hehadno

  interestindisturbingthehumbleagentsofproduction,andaverygreatinterestinretainingthem。Fromsimilarreasons,aclaimtomortgageorsellhispossessoryinterest,wassufferedtoestablishitself。Butthenallthesesubordinateinterestswereonlyrespectedinpeacefultimes,andundermoderategovernors;andthese

  wererareinIndia。Ithasbeenhithertothemisfortuneofthatcountry,toseearapidsuccessionofshortlivedempires:the

  convulsionsamidstwhichtheywereestablished,havehardlysubsided,beforethepeoplehavebeguntobeharassedbythe

  consequencesoftheirweaknessanddecay。Whileanyreallyefficientgeneralgovernmenthasexisted,ithasbeentheobvious

  interest,andusuallytheaimofthechiefstoactuponsomedefinitesystem;toputsome

  limittotheirownexactions;to

  protecttheryots,andfostercultivationbygivingreasonablesecuritytoalltheinterestsconcernedinit。TheMogul

  emperorsactedinthisspirit,whileexercisingapoweroverthesoil,whichhadnorealbounds,butthosewhichthey

  prescribedtothemselves。Butastheempiregrewfeeble,andthesubordinatechieftains,Mahometan,orHindoo,beganto

  exerciseanuncontrolledpowerintheirdistricts,theirrapacityandviolenceseemusuallytohavebeenwhollyuncheckedby

  policyorprinciple。Therewasatonceanendtoallsystem,moderation,orprotection;ruinousrents,arbitrarilyimposed,

  werecollectedinfrequentmilitarycircuits,atthespear\'spoint;andtheresistanceoftenattemptedindespair,wasunsparinglypunishedbyfireandslaughter。Sceneslikethese,intheancienthistoryofIndia,havebeenfrequentlyrenewed,andsucceededrapidlyshortintervalsof

  repose。Theywereofcoursedisastrous。Halftherichterritoryofthatcountryhasneverbeencultivated,thoughswarming

  withapopulationtowhomthepermissiontomakeitfruitfulinmoderatesecurity,wouldhavebeenhappiness;andnothingcanwellexceedtheordinarypovertyoftheryots,andtheinefficiencyoftheirmeansofcultivation。TheEnglish,whentheybecametherepresentativesoftheMogulemperorinBengal,beganbypushingtoanextremetheir

  rightsasproprietorsofthesoil;andneglectedthesubordinateclaimsoftheZemindarsandryots,inamannerwhichwasfelt

  tobeoppressiveandtyrannical,althoughnotperhapsinstrictnessillegal。Agreatreactionhastakenplaceintheirviewsand

  feelings;perceivingthenecessityofrestoringconfidencetothecultivators,andanxioustoshakeofftheimputationof

  injusticeandtyranny,theyshowedthemselvesquitewillingtopartwiththeircharacterofownersofthesoil,andtoretain

  simplythatofitssovereign。Anagreementwasinconsequenceenteredinto,bywhichtheZemindarsassumedacharacter,

  whichcertainlyneverbeforebelongedtothem,thatofthedirectlandlordsofthoseryots,betweenwhomandthesupreme

  governmenttheyhadbeforebeenonlyagents;agents,however,possessedofmanyimperfectbutprescriptiverightstoan

  hereditaryinterestintheiroffice。Thegovernment,insteadofexactingrents,wascontenttoreceiveafixedandpermanenttax;forwhichthenewlandlordsweretoberesponsible。Therecanbenodoubtofthefairandevenbenevolentspirit,inwhichthisarrangementwasmade。Itseemshowevertobe

  nowgenerallyadmitted,thattheclaimsoftheZemindarswereoverrated,andthatifsomethinglesshadbeendoneforthem,

  andsomethingmoreforthesecurityandindependenceoftheryots,thesettlement,withoutbeinglessjustorgenerous,

  wouldhavebeenmuchmoreexpedient。

  SECTIONIII。

  OnRyotRentsinPersia。Ofallthedespoticgovernmentsoftheeast,thatofPersiaisperhapsthemostgreedy,andthemostwantonlyunprincipled;

  yetthepeculiarsoilofthatcountryhasintroducedsomevaluablemodificationsofthegeneralAsiaticsystemofryotrents,

  andforcedthegovernment,unscrupulousasitis,totreatthevariousinterestsinthelandsubordinatetothoseofthecrown,withconsiderableforbearance。Oneofthemostremarkablegeologicalfeaturesoftheoldworld,isthatgreattractofsandydesert,whichextendsacrossits

  wholebreadth,andimposesapeculiarcharacteronthetribeswhichroamoveritssurface,orinhabititsborders。Itformsthe

  shoresoftheAtlanticonthewesterncoastofAfrica,andconstitutestheZaharaorgreatsandydesert,whichhas

  contributedtoconcealsolongthecentralregionsofthatquarteroftheglobefromEuropeancuriosity。Itformsnextthe

  surfaceofEgyptwiththeexceptionofthevalleyoftheNile;stretchesacrosstheArabianwastes,toSyria,Persia,andupper

  India;andturningfromPersianorthwards,threadsbetweenMushedandHerat4theElburz

  andParapomisanmountains,

  partsoftheCaucasianorHimalayanchain;runsnorth-eastwardthroughTartary,androundingthenorthernextremityof

  China,sinksfinally,itissupposed,beneaththewavesofthePacific。ThegreaterpartoftheterritoriesofPersiaeither

  consistofthisdesert,orborderonit;andpartakesomuchofitsparchedandsterilecharacter,thattheeyeatashort

  distancecanhardlytracetheboundary。5Thissoilcanbemadefruitfulonlybyirrigation。Butwater,saysFrazer,isthemost

  scantyboonofnatureinPersia;itsriversaresmallandfew,andrivulets,bynomeanscommon,canonlybeappliedtoa

  verylimitedquantityofcultivation。Inthebestdistricts,thesmallproportionofcultivatedlandresemblesanOasisinthedesert,servingbycontrasttomakeallarounditmoredreary。6Asthenaturalspringsandstreamsareinsufficienttosupportthecultivationbywhichthepeoplemustexist,thePersians

  establishwithgreatlaborandexpenseartificialsources,calledcannauts。Theysinkonthesidesofhillslongchainsofwells,

  ofdifferentdepths,andcommunicatingbyachannel,whichconductstothelowestthewatercollectedinthem:thencethe

  streamisdistributedoverthefieldswhichitistofertilize。Theseworks,alwayscostlyandimportant,areofvarioussizes;

  thechainofwellsissaidtobeoccasionallythirty-sixmilesinlength,andacannautisspokenofinChorassan,intowhichahorsemanmayridewithhislanceuponhisshoulder;7moreordinarily,thechannelsaresmall,andthechainofwellsdoesnotexceedtwomilesinlength。Whenever,bytheseorothermeans,waterisbroughttothesurface,scenesoforiental

  vegetationspringuprapidlyandluxuriantly。Iffromwar,oroppression,oraccident,ortime,theworksofmanare

  destroyedorneglected,thesceneoffertilityvanishes,andthedesertresumesitsdomain。

  TheplainofYezid-Khaustinthe

  routefromShiraztoTeheran,wasoncecelebratedforitsbeautyandfertility:Mr。Frazerpassedoveritin1821,andthus

  describesit。\"TheplainofYezid-Khaust,whichextendsinthelineofourrouteallthewaytoKomaishah,presented,

  towardsthelatterplace,atrulylamentablepictureofthegeneraldeclineofprosperityinPersia。Ruinsoflargevillages

  thicklyscatteredabout,withtheskeleton-likewallsofcaravanseraisandgardens,alltellingofbettertimes,stoodlike

  mementomoristokingdomsandgovernments;andthewholeplainwasdottedoverwithsmallmounds,whichindicatethe

  courseofcannauts,oncethesourceofrichesandfertility,nowallchokedupanddry,forthereisneithermannbrcultivation

  torequiretheiraid。\"8ThedistrictofNishaporewasanothercelebratedseatofPersiancultivation。\"Itwasadded,\"saysMr。

  Frazer,speakingoftheinformationhereceivedconcerningthisplace;\"thatinthedifferentdepartmentsofNishaporethey

  reckon14000distinctvillages,allinhabited,andirrigatedby12000cannautsand18smallriversfromthemountains。This

  magnificentdetailisnodoubtgreatlyexaggerated,beingbutareiterationofthetraditionalaccountofthisplaceinitsdays

  ofhighprosperity:nosuchvastpopulationorcultivationnowexists;mostofthevillagesareruinous;thecannauts,the

  remainsofwhich,coveringtheplain,mayservealmosttoattestthetruthoftheabovestatement,arenowchokedupanddry。\"9NowtheprincipalrevenueofthemonarchsofPersiaisderivedfromtheproduceoftheearth,ofwhichtheyarethesupreme

  owners。Itcouldnotescapeeventheireyes,blinded。astheyarebygreedinessandhabitsofrapine,thatthecostofthus

  wrestingcultivatedspotsfromthedesert,andmaintainingtheminfruitfulness,wouldneverbeincurred,unlessthe

  undertakersfeltreallysecurethattheirpropertyinthemwouldbesubsequentlyrespected。BythelawsofPersia,therefore,

  hewhobringswatertothesurface,whereitneverwasbefore,isguaranteedbythesovereigninthehereditarypossessionof

  thelandfertilizedbyhim,andwhileareservedrentofone-fifthoftheproduceispaidtotheShah,thepossessordisposesof

  itashepleases,andiseffectuallyitsproprietor,subjecttoarentcharge。Ifhechoosestoletoutthewater,atmoneyrents,

  tootherpersonswhohavelands,whichalreadypaytheroyalrentinproduce,thentherentofthewaterishisown:the

  crownprofitsonlybyadditionalfertilitythusbestoweduponspots,intheproduceofwhichitshares。AmongthePersiansof

  property,mostusuallythoseinoffice,makingcannautsisafavoritespeculation;thevillagers,too,oftenjoinandconstructthem,andthesearethebestproofsthatthisguaranteeofthesovereignisfaithfullyobserved。Makingproperallowances,however,forthemoresteadyrespectforsubordinateinterests,whichtheoutlayforartificial

  irrigationmakesnecessaryonthepartofthePersiansovereigns,theirmanagementoftheterritorytheyownisverysimilar

  towhatwehaveseenprevailsinIndia。Theryotsinhabitingvillagescultivatethesoilincommon,orinallotments

  determinedamongthemselves;theirinterestinthelandishereditary。\"Theoriginalcustomarylawconcerningproperty,\"

  saysMr。Frazer,\"clearlyprovidedwithmuchconsiderationforthesecurityoftheryot。Therightsofthevillagerwere

  guardedatleastascarefullyastheseofhislord:histitletocultivatehisportionoflanddescendstohimfromtheoriginal

  commencementofthevillagetowhichhebelongs,andcanneitherbedisputedorrefusedhim,norcanheforfeitit,norcanthelordofthevillageejectanyryotwhileheconductshimselfwellandpayshisportionoftherent。\"10Therentatpresentexactedfromtheryotisone-fifthpertoftheproduce;ithasvariedandbeendifferentlyamusedatthe

  discretionofdifferentPrinces,moreparticularlyNushirvanandThour。ThePersian。nowstatethatbyancientcustomonly

  one-tenthwasdue:thattheothertenthwasagreedtobepaidonapromisethatthesaadurautorirregulartaxesshouldcease;butthatthoughtheadditionaltenthhasbeenexacted,thetaxesremainatleastasoppressiveasbefore。11Abovethesehereditarycultivatorsisasubordinateproprietor,oftencalledbyFraserthelordofthevillage,whoisentitled

  toone-tenthofthecrop。InthismantheIndianZemindarisimmediatelyrecognised:butthoughthewordZemindarwas

  originallyPersian,itdoesnotappeartobeinfamiliaruseinPersiaatpresent。Therightofhereditarysuccessiontothis

  intermediateinterestcannothavebeenfullyrecognisedforanyverylongperiod。Chardinstatesthatinhistimethepractice

  oftakingleasesfor99yearsfromthecrownwasonlybeginningtoestablishitself。Bernierdistinctlydeniesthatsuchathing

  asprivatepropertyinlandwasknowninPersia。Theinterestsofthisclassofmenhavenaturallygatheredstrengthand

  permanenceinPersia。evenmorerapidlythaninIndia,fromthenecessityofadvancesforthepurposesofirrigation,which

  wereusuallymadebythem。Theirrighttothetenthoftheproduceseemstobenowsocompletelyseveredfromtheduties

  ofcollection,thatthejealousyofthePersianmonarchsforbidsthemsometimeseventoresideintheirvillages,toprevent,it

  issaid,theirtyrannizingovertheryots,12moreprobablytogetridoftheirinterferenceinresistingtheexactionsofthegovernmentofficers,whichitisfoundtheycandomoreeffectuallythantheryotsthemselves。13TherearepersonsinPersiawhoboast,perhapswithtruth,thattheseestates,astheycallthem,havebeeninthehandsof

  theirfamilyforalongsuccessionofyears。DidthereexistarealbodyoflandedproprietorsinPersia,assecureinthe

  possessionoftheirheritageasthesemenareintheirlimitedinterests,thedespotismoftheShahwouldatoncebeshackled。

  Butmenentitledtocollectone-tenthoftheproducefromtenantshereditarylikethemselves,whilethegreatsovereign

  proprietoriscollectingafifthatthesametime,arelittlelikelytoacquireaninfluenceinthecountry,sufficienttoprotect

  eitherthesubordinateryotsorthemselves;andaccordinglythechiefweightofwhatisprobablyoneoftheworst

  governmentsintheworld,restsuponthenecksofthecultivators。\"ThereisnoclassofmensaysFraserwhosesituation

  presentsamoremelancholypictureofoppressionandtyrannythanthefarmersandcultivatorsofthegroundinPersia。They

  livecontinuallyunderasystemofextortionandinjustice,fromwhichtheyhavenomeansofescape,andwhichisthemore

  distressing,becauseitisindefinitebothinformandextent,fornomancantellwhen,

  how,ortowhatamountdemandsupon

  himmaywithoutwarningbemade。Itisuponthefarmersandpeasantrythatthewholeextortionpractisedinthecountry

  finallyalights。Thekingwringsfromhisministersandgovernors;theymustprocurethesumsrequiredfromtheheadsof

  districts,whointheirturndemanditfromthezabutsorketkhodahsofvillages,andthesemustatlastsqueezeitfromthe

  ryots;eachoftheseintermediateagentsmustalsohavetheirprofits,sothatthesumreceivedbythekingbearssmall

  proportiontothatwhichispaidbytheryots。Everytax,everypresent,everyfine,fromwhomsoeverreceivedordemanded

  inthefirstinstance,ultimatelyfallsonthem,andsuchisthecharacteroftheirrulers,thattheonlymeasureofthesedemands

  isthepowertoextortontheonehand,andtheabilitytogiveorretainontheother。\"14

  SECTIONIV。

  OnRyotRentsinTurkey。WhentheTurks,aftersubduingtheprovincesoftheGreekEmpire,finallyquarteredthemselvesuponitsruins,the

  foundationoftheirsystemofrevenueandgovernment,likethatofotherTartartribes,resteduponanassumptionthattheirleaderhadbecomethelegitimateproprietoroftheconqueredsoil。Therentimposeduponthecultivatorsappearstohavebeenoriginallycalculatedatone-tenthofthegrossproduce;andthe

  estimatedvalueofeachdistrict,atthatrate,wasataveryearlydateregisteredinthetreasury。Theregistersarestillused,in

  accountingwiththePachasofthedifferentprovinces。Butastherentpaidbyeachdistrictnevervaries,whateverchanges

  takeplaceinitscultivation,thedecayofagricultureandpopulationhasloadedmanyofthepeasantswithmuchheavier

  burthensthantheyatfirstbore。One-seventhoftheproducewherethecultivatorisaTurk,onefifthwhereheisaChristian,

  haveappearedtolatertravellersinGreecetobeabouttheaverageactualpaymenttothecrown。

  TheviolencewithwhichtheTurksexemplifiedinpracticetheirAsiaticnotionsofthesupremerightoftheirleadertothesoil,willbebestjudgedofbytheirnextmeasure。TheSultangrantedaconsiderableportionofhisproprietaryrightstoothers,forthepurposeofformingasortoffeudal

  militia。Theofficersofrankreceivedallotmentsoflandcalledziametsandtimars,inwhichtheirrightsrepresentthoseofthe

  sovereign,andthenumbercreatedoftheseexceeded50,000。Theziametdifferedfromthetimarsonlyinbeinglarger。For

  thesegrantstheywereboundtoperformmilitaryservices,withaspecifiednumberofmen。Theirforcesconstituted,tillthe

  riseoftheJanissaries,themainforceoftheEmpire,andamounteditissaidto150,000men。Similargrantsareknownin

  IndiabythenameofIaghires,inPersiabythatofTeecools,buttheywereestablishedlesssystematicallyinthosecountries

  thaninTurkey。Theretheselandshaveneverbecomehereditary。Theyarestillstrictlylifehold。Intheearlydaysoftheir

  institution,usewasmadeofthemtoexcitemilitaryemulation。Onthedeathofthepossessor,oneofthebravestofhis

  comradeswasimmediatelyappointedtohisestate,andonetimarhasbeenknowntobethusgrantedeighttimesinasingle

  campaign。15Thedisposalofthem,however,haslongbecomewhollyvenal。AnAganotunfrequentlypurchasesduringhis

  lifethegrantofthereversiontohisfamily;butifheneglectstodothis,hisrelativesaredispossessedathisdeath,unless

  theyoutbidallotherapplicants。16Withtheexceptionoftheseinterestsforlife,andoftheestatesvestedintheUlemaor

  expoundersofMohammedanlaw,therearenodistinctlyrecognizedproprietaryrightsinTurkey。Althoughthere,asamong

  theryotsofIndiaandPersia,andelsewherethroughouttheeast,thereexistclaimstothehereditarypossessionofland。

  WhilethepeasantpaystotheSultan,ortotheAgatowhoseZaimorTimarhebelongs,thelegalportionofhisproduce,his

  righttooccupyandtransmithislandsisnotcontested,andissecure,asfarasanythingissecurethere。InGreecethelands

  were,beforethepresentconvulsion,verygenerallycultivatedbytheancientmortitaeormetayertenants,whopaidtothe

  Agashalfoftheirproduce。WhetherthelandsthuscultivatedconsistexclusivelyofthedomainlandsattachedtotheAga\'s

  Timar,orwhetherthisrentispaidinconsiderationofstockadvancedtotherayah。toenablehimtocultivatebetterthelands

  ofwhichbeishimselfthehereditarytenant,Ihavenomaterialsforjudging。Itisprobablethatmortitaearefoundofbothdescriptions。ThereareevidentlysomeadvantagesintheTurkishsystemcomparedwiththoseofIndiaorPersia。Thepermanenceand

  moderationofthemiriorlandrent,isaverygreatone。Ifcollectedonanequitablesystem,thatrentwouldbenomorethan

  areasonablelandtax,andtheuniversalproprietorshipoftheSultanwouldbereducedtoamerenominalorhonorary

  superiority,likethatclaimedbymanyoftheChristianmonarchsofEurope。Wemayadd,thattheTurkishgovernmenthas

  neverbeensowhollyunequaltothetaskofcontrollingitsofficers,asthefeebledynastiesofDelhiintheirdecline:norso

  rapaciousandcapriciousinitsownexactionsastheShahsofPersia:butitscomparativemoderationandstrengthhave

  remaineduselesstoitsunhappysubjects,fromadegreeofsupinenessandindifferenceas

  tothemalversationsofitsdistant

  officers,whichmaybetraced,partlyperhapstothebigotrywhichhasmadethecommanderofthefaithfulcarelessaboutthe

  treatmenthisChristiansubjectsreceivedfromMahometanofficers:andpartlytoanobstinateignoranceoftheordinaryarts

  ofcivilizedgovernments,whichthevanityoftheOttomanshascherishedasifitwereamerit,andwhichtheirbigotryhas

  alsohelpedtorecommendtotheirgoodopinion。Nearthecapital,andinthecountrieswheretheTurksthemselvesare

  numerous,therearesomeboundstotheoppressionofthePachasandAgas。TheTurks,secureofjusticeiftheycancontrive

  tobeheardbythesuperiorauthorities,havefoundthemeansofprotectingtheirpersonsandproperties,bybelongingto

  societies,whichareboundasbodies,toseekjusticeforthewrongsofindividualmembers。

  Butinthedistantprovincesno

  sectissafe。Thecryoftheoppressediseasilystifled,andiffaintlyheard,seemshabituallydisregarded。TheSultanindeed

  abstains,withsingularforbearance,fromanyattemptstoraisetherevenuepaidtohimself;butprovideditisregularly

  transmittedbythePachasoftheprovinces,hecareslittlebywhatmeans,orwithwhatadditionalextortions,itiswrung

  fromthepeople。Theconsequencesaresuchasmightbeexpected。ThejealousyofthegovernmentallowsthePachasto

  remaininofficebutashorttime,theknowledgeofthisinflamestheircupidity,andthewretchedcultivatorsareallowedto

  existinpeaceuponthesoil,onlywhiletheysubmittoexactionswhichhavenootherlimitthanthephysicalimpossibilityofgettingmorefromthem。VolneyhasaccuratelydescribedtheeffectofthisstateofthingsinSyriaandEgypt。\"TheabsolutetitleoftheSultantothe

  soilappearstoaggravatetheoppressionofhisofficers。Thesonisnevercertainofsucceedingtothefather,andthe

  peasantryoftenflyindesperationfromasoilwhichhasceasedtoyieldthemthecertaintyofevenabaresubsistence。

  Exactions,undiminishedinamount,aredemanded,andasfaraspossibleextorted,fromthosewhoremain;depopulation

  goeson,thewasteextendsitself,anddesolationbecomespermanent。\"Itisthusthatascantyandmostmiserableremnantof

  thepeoplearefoundoccupyingtracts,whichwerethegloryofancientcivilization;andofwhichtheclimateandthesoilare

  such,thatmenwouldmultiplyandwouldenrich,almostwithouteffort,themselvesandtheirmasters;didthegeneral

  governmentthinkfittoprotectitssubjectswithhalftheenergyitsometimesexerts,toforcethespoilerstodisgorgea

  miserablepittanceofplunderintotheimperialtreasury。

  SECTIONV。

  OfRyotRentsinChina。WeknowenoughofChinatobeaware,thatthesovereignisthere,aselsewhereinAsia,thesoleproprietorofthesoil:but

  wehardlyknowenoughtojudgeaccuratelyofthepeculiarmodificationswhichthissystemofimperialownershiphas

  receivedinthatcountry。ThemannerinwhichtheChinesegovernmentassumespossessionoftheland,andimposesarent

  uponitinthecaseofnewconquests,iscuriouslyillustratedbyaletterofavictoriousChinesecommandertotheEmperor,

  publishedbyMr。Patton。17Althoughone-tenthoftheproduceisthenominalrentinChina,itisnotunlikelythatavery

  differentportionisactuallycollected。Itwouldbeveryinterestingtohavemoremultipliedanddetailedobservationsonthe

  practicaleffectsofthesystemamongtheChinese,thanthejealousyofthegovernmentislikelysoontogiveopportunityforobtaining。TheprogressandeffectsofryotrentsinChina,mustalmostnecessarilyhavebeenverydifferentfromthoseexhibitedby

  India,Persia,orTurkey。Intheselastcountries,thevicesofthegovernment,andtheoppressionanddegradationresulting

  fromthem,haveleftuslittlemeansofjudgingwhatmightbetheresultsofthesystemitself,ifconductedforany

  considerableperiodbyanadministrationmoremildandforbearing,andcapableofgivingsecuritytothepersonsand

  propertyofthecultivators。InChinathisexperimentseemstohavebeenfairlytried。Theartsofgovernmentare,toacertain

  extent,understoodbythelaboriouslyeducatedcivilians,bywhosehandstheaffairsoftheEmpirearecarriedon;thecountry

  has,tillverylately,beenremarkablyfreefromintestineconvulsionorseriousforeignwars,andtheadministrationhasbeen

  wellorganized,pacificandefficient。ThewholeconductindeedoftheEmpire,presentsastrikingcontrasttothatofthe

  neighbouringAsiaticmonarchies,thepeopleofwhich,accustomedtoseeviolenceandbloodshed

  thecommoninstruments

  ofgovernment,expressgreatwonderatthespectacleoftheChinesestatesmenupholdingtheauthorityofthestateratherby

  thepenthanthesword。18Oneeffectweknowtohavefollowedfromthepublictranquillity:thespreadofagriculture,and

  anincreaseofpeoplemuchbeyondthatoftheneighbouringcountries。WhilenotonehalfofIndiahaseverbeenreclaimed,andlessstillofPersia,Chinaisasfullycultivated,andmorefullypeopledthanmostEuropeanmonarchies。Whetheranyclassofsubordinateproprietorsexistsbetweenthecrownandthepersonspayingproducerentsliketothe

  Zemindars,ofIndia;whetherthepersonsactuallyliableforthepro。ducerents,arethecultivatingpeasantsthemselves,ora

  classabovethem,wehavenosufficientdatatodetermine。Insomecases,atleast,theactualcultivatorsarepersonshiringthegroundfromthoseliableforthecrown,andpayingthemhalftheproduce。ThereareabundantindicationsthattheChinesepopulationhas,insomepartsoftheEmpire,increasedbeyondthenumber

  forwhichtheterritorycanproduceaplentifulsubsistence,andthattheyareinastateofthemostwretchedpenury。Thevery

  facilitiesforincreasewhichgoodgovernmentgivestoaryotpopulation,willusuallybefollowedbysuchaconsequence,if

  intheprogressoftheirmultiplicationacertainadvancehasnottakenplaceinthehabitsandcivilizationofthemassofthe

  people。Theabsenceofthatimprovementmayflowfromvariouscauses,whichinunfoldingthesubjectofpopulation,itwill

  bepartofourbusinesstodistinguish。WeknowenoughofChinatobesure,thatobstaclestothe

  ameliorationofthehabits

  andcharacterofthemassofthepeople,existinabundancethere,andthereforetherapidspreadofpopulation,uptoa

  certainpoint,wouldcertainlybethefirsteffectofamildadministration。AccordingtoKiaproth,thenumberofryots

  paysanscontribuablesatthetimeoftheMantchouconquestin1644,wasregisteredastwenty-sixmillions,whileallother

  classeswereestimatedatelevenmillions。Andsincethattimehecalculatesthatthewholepopulationhasquadrupled。

  TherevenueofChinaamountstoabouteighty-fourmillionsofouncesofsilver。Ofthisrevenue,aboutthirty-threemillions

  ispaidinmoney,andaboutfifty-onemillionsingrains,rice,&c。,consumedforthemostpartbythelocaladministrationof

  theprovinces。Aportiononly,ofthevalueofaboutsixmillionsofounces,isannuallyremittedtoPekin。Thereceiptofthis

  hugerevenue,intheprimitiveshapeofagriculturalproduce,isastrikingproofthatthepowerandmeansoftheEmperorof

  China,likethoseofothereasternsovereigns,areintimatelyconnectedwith,orratherfoundedon,hisrightsasuniversalproprietorofthesoil。19ThereareotherconsiderablecountriesinAsiainwhichwehavegoodreasontoconclude,thatryotrentsprevail;consisting,

  first,ofthecountriesbetweenHindostanandChina,theBirmanEmpire,anditsdependencies,CochinChina,&c。;and,

  secondly,ofthestatesinhabitedbyagriculturalTartars,northoftheHimalayamountainsandeastofPersia,Samarcan,

  Bokhara,andthestatesofLittleBucharia:butthepeculiarmodificationsthesystemmayreceiveinthesecountries,andthe

  detailsoftherelationstherebetweenlandlordandtenant,areatpresentevenmoreoutofourreachthaninthecaseof

  China。

  SECTIONVI。

  MixtureofotherRentswithRyot。Onexamining,whereweareabletodoitminutely,thestateofthecountriesinwhichryotrentsprevail,weareimmediately

  struckwiththefact,thattheyaresometimesmixedupwithbothlaborrentsandmetayerrents。Thelandthenpresentsa

  strangecomplicationofinterests。Thereisanhereditarytenant,liabletoaproducerenttothecrown,andbycustomand

  prescriptionirremoveablewhilehepaysit。Thissametenant,receivingsomeassistanceinseedandimplements,paysa

  secondproducerenttoanotherperson,whosecharacterfluctuatesbetweenthatofanhereditaryofficerofthecrown,and

  thatofasubordinateproprietor;andsometimesathirdrentispaidtothissubordinateproprietor,inlabor,exertedonlandcultivatedforhisexclusivebenefit。Tobeginwiththelaborrents,thusengraftedonryotrents。TheRyotofBengaloftengrantsaplotofhisgroundtoa

  ploughmanwhoassistshim。Thisisapurelaborrent,paidbytheunder-tenant。TheZemindarsoftendemandfromtheryots

  themselves,acertainquantityoflabor,tobeperformedontheirdomainlands。Thisdemandisoftenexcessive,andisthe

  sourceofgrievousoppressionandfrequentcomplaint,bothinIndiaandPersia。Whenmoderatehowever,itisconsidered

  legal,andthenformsanotherlaborrent,paidbytheryothimself。TheAgasofTurkeyoftenforcetherayahsoftheirZaims

  orTimars,toperformacertainnumberofdays\'workontheirownprivatefarms。Thisisunquestionablyaltogetheranillegalexaction;butissocustomarythatitmustbecountedinpracticeasanadditionalrent。MetayerrentstoohaveaconstanttendencytospringupandengraftthemselvesonryotrentsthroughoutAsia,whereverthe

  moderationandefficiencyofthegovernmentissuchastoensureprotectiontothepropertyadvancedtothecultivator,or

  wherevertherelationofthepartyadvancingstocktothecultivator,issuchastogiveapeculiarpowerofenforcing

  payment,andapeculiarinterestinassistingcultivation。BoththegovernmentandtheZemindarsinIndiaoccasionally

  advanceseedandstocktotheryot。Thegovernmentreluctantly,andonlywhenitcannotavoidit:thelandsthuscultivated

  onthepartofgovernment,arecalledcossandcomar;andtogetthemintothehandsofryots,whocancultivatethemselves,

  seemstohavebeenalwaysanobjectofpolicy。TheZemindarsmorereadilyandhabituallymakesuchadvances,andastheir

  shareoftheproduceisthenregulatedwhollybytheirprivatebargainwiththeryot,henodoubtisoccasionallymuch

  oppressed:butthisisnotalwaysthecase。InPersiaparticularly,thisarrangementisconsideredthebestforthetenant;

  becauseinthatcountry,itisonlyinthiscase,thattheZemindarorsubordinateproprietorundertakestowardoffthe

  extortionoftheofficersofthecrown,andtosettlewiththemhimself。

  SECTIONVII。

  SummaryofRyotRents。Thereisnothingmischievousinthedirecteffectofryotrents。Theyareusuallymoderate;andwhenrestrictedtoatenth,or

  evenasixth,fifth,orfourthoftheproduce,ifcollectedpeacefullyandfairly,theybecomeaspeciesoflandtax,andleave

  thetenantabeneficialhereditaryestate。Itisfromtheirindirecteffects,therefore,andfromtheformofgovernmentinwhich

  theyoriginate,andwhichtheyservetoperpetuate,thattheyarefullofevil,andarefoundinpracticemorehopelesslydestructiveofthepropertyandprogressofthepeople,thananyformoftherelationoflandlordandtenantknowntous。Theproprietaryrightsofthesovereign,andhislargeandpracticallyindefiniteinterestintheproduce,preventtheformation

  ofanyreallyindependentbodyontheland。Bythedistributionoftherentswhichhisterritoryproduces,themonarch

  maintainsthemostinfluentialportionoftheremainingpopulationinthecharacterofcivilormilitaryofficers。Thereremain

  onlytheinhabitantsofthetownstointerposeachecktohispower:butthemajorityofthesearefedbytheexpenditureof

  thesovereignorhisservants。Weshallhaveafitteropportunitytopointout,howcompletelytheprosperity,orratherthe

  existence,ofthetownsofAsia,proceedsfromthelocalexpenditureofthegovernment。Asthecitizensarethusdestitute

  fromtheirpositionofrealstrength,sotheAsiaticsovereigns,havingnobodyofpowerfulprivilegedlandedproprietorsto

  contendwith,havenothadthemotiveswhichtheEuropeanmonarchshad,tonurseandfosterthetownsintoenginesof

  politicalinfluence,andthecitizensareproverbiallythemosthelplessandprostrateoftheslavesofAsia。Thereexistsnothing

  thereforeinthesocietybeneathhim,whichcanmodifythepowerofasovereign,whoisthesupremeproprietorofa

  territorycultivatedbyapopulationofryotpeasants。Allthatthereisofrealstrengthinsuchapopulation,lookstohimas

  thesolesourcenotmerelyofprotectionbutofsubsistence:heisbyhispositionandnecessarilyadespot。Buttheresultsof

  Asiaticdespotismhaveeverbeenthesame:whileitisstrongitisdelegated,anditspowerabusedbyitsagents;whenfeeble

  anddeclining,thatpowerisviolentlysharedbyitsinferiors,anditsstolenauthorityyetmoreabused。Initsstrengthandin

  itsweaknessitisalikedestructiveoftheindustryandwealthofitssubjects,andalltheartsofpeace;anditisthiswhich

  makesthatpeculiarsystemofrents,onwhichitspowerrests,particularlyobjectionableandcalamitoustothecountriesinwhichitprevails。Incountriescultivatedbyryots,thewagesofthemainbodyofthepeoplearedeterminedbytherenttheypay,asisthecase

  itwillberememberedunderallvarietiesofpeasantrents。Thequantityofproducebeingdeterminedbythefertilityofthe

  soil,theextentofhisallotmentsofland,andtheskill,industry,andefficiencyoftheryot:thedivitionofthatproduceonwhichhiswagesdepend,isdeterminedbyhiscontractwiththelandlord,thatis,bytherenthepays。Inlikemannertheamountofrentinsuchcountriesisdeterminedbytheamountofwages。Theamountoftheproducebeing

  decidedasbefore,thelandlord\'sshare,therent,dependsuponthecontracthemakeswiththelaborer,thatis,upontheamountdeductedaswages。Theexistenceandprogressofrentsundertheryotsystemisinnodegreedependentupontheexistenceofdifferentqualities

  ofsoil,ordifferentreturnstothestockandlaboremployedoneach。Thesovereignproprietorhasthemeansofenablinga

  bodyoflaborerstomaintainthemselves,whowithoutthemachineryoftheearthwithwhichhesuppliesthem,muststarve。Thiswouldsecurehimashareintheproduceoftheirlabor,thoughallthelandswereperfectlyequalinquality。Ryotrentsmayincreasefromtwocauses,fromanincreaseofthewholeproduce,effectedbythegreaterskill,industry,and

  efficiencyofthetenant:orfromanincreaseofthesovereign\'sproportionoftheproduce;theproduceitselfremainingthesame,andthetenant\'ssharebecomingless。Whentherentincreasesandtheproduceremainsstationary,theincreaseindicatesnoaugmentationofpublicwealth。There

  hasbeenatransferofwealth,butnoincreaseofit;andonepartyisimpoverishedbythepreciseamountthatanotheris

  enriched。Butwhenryotrentsincreasebecausetheproducehasbecomelarger,thecountryisenrichedbyanadditionof

  wealthtothefullamountoftheincrease。Itspowerofmaintainingfleetsandarmies,andalltheelementsofpublicstrength,

  havebeenaugmentedtothatextent;therehasbeenarealincreaseofwealth,notameretransferofwhatbeforeexisted,

  fromonehandtoanother。Suchanincreasetooindicatesanaugmentationoftherevenuesoftheryotsthemselves。Ifthetenthorsixthofthesovereignhasdoubled,thenine-tenthsorfive-sixthsoftheryothavedoubledalso。Theincreaseofrentswhichisthusseentogohandinhandwiththe,improvementofthegeneralwealthandstrength,isthat

  whichaloneinthelongruncanreallybenefitthelandlord。Whileanincreaseofproducerentshasitssourceingreatercrops,

  itmaygoontilltheskillofmanandthefertilityoftheearthhavereachedtheirmaximum,thatis,indefinitely。Asiatic

  tenants,cultivatingwiththeirownsoilandclimate,andtheskillandenergyofthebestEuropeanfarmers,mightcreate

  producemuchgreaterthananyyetknowninthatquarteroftheglobe,andbegreatlyimprovingtheirownrevenuewhile

  theywerepayingincreasedrentstothesovereign。Andwhiletheprosperityoftheryotsthuskeptpacewiththeincreaseof

  rents,theresultwouldbe,notmerelyanincreaseofthecropsonthelandsalreadycultivated,buttherapidspreadof

  cultivationtootherlands。Aprotectedandthrivingandincreasingpopulationwouldspeedily

  reclaimtherichwastesof

  TurkeyandIndia,andcallbacktheirvanishedfertilitytothedesertedplainsofPersia,multiplyingateverystepboththe

  directrevenueofthesovereignlandlord,andhisresourcesinthegeneralwealthofhispeople。TakingAsiaasawhole,such

  aprogressseemsvisionary,butitisoccasionallyexhibited,onasmallerscale,inamannerwhichverydistinctlyprovesit

  possible,andindeedeasyonthegreatest。20Anincreaseofrentsderivedfromastationaryproduce,andadiminutionofthe

  ryot\'sshare,areunfortunatelymorecommoninAsia,andleadtonosuchresults。Inthestateinwhichtheryotsusually

  exist,todecreasetheirrevenueistoinjureifnottodestroytheirefficiencyasagentsofcultivation。Aseriousinvasionofitis

  veryusuallyfollowed,andcarriedtoacertainextentitmustbefollowed,bythedesertionofthecultivatorsandthe

  abandonmentofcultivation,andatotalcessationofrent。Thegreedinessofeasternrulersordinarilysnatchesatthebaitof

  presentgain,andoverlooksordisregardstheverydifferentultimateconsequenceswhichfollowtheaugmentingtheirlanded

  revenues,fromtheone,orfromtheother,ofthesesourcesofincrease。HenceinagreatmeasuretheactualstateofAsia,the

  miseryofthepeople,thepovertyandfeeblenessofthegovernments。Anexaminationintothenatureandeffectsofryot

  rents,receivesarealmostmournfulinterestfromtheconviction,thatthepoliticalandsocialinstitutionsofthepeopleofthis

  largedivisionoftheearth,arelikelyformanylongagesyettocome,torestuponthem。Wecannotunveilthefuture,but

  thereislittleinthecharacteroftheAsiaticpopulation,whichcantemptuseventospeculateuponatime,whenthatfuture,withrespecttothem,willessentiallydifferfromthepastandthepresent。1。TheyhavebeenintroducedbyAsiaticsintoTurkeyinEurope。TheyexistinEgypt;andmayperhapshereafterbetracedinAfrica。2。Elphinstone\'sCaubul,Vol。II。p。215。Whenthepeoplearecollectedintocamps,theyaregovernedbytheirown

  Mooshirs,withoutanyreferencetotheKhaun,andwhentheyarescatteredoverthecountry,theysubsistwithoutany

  governmentatall:butwhenamarchiscontemplated,theyimmediatelysubmittotheKhaun,andwheretheyhavetopassan

  enemy\'scountry,heisappointedheadoftheChelwashtees,assumesanabsoluteauthority,andbecomesanobjectofrespect

点击下载App,搜索"An Essay on the Distribution of Wealth",免费读到尾