ThestatusoftheChiefhasthusleftusonebequestintheruleofPrimogeniture,which,however,haslonglostitsmostancientform;anotherintherighttoreceivecertainduesandtoenforcecertainmonopolies;andathirdinaspeciallyabsoluteformofpropertywhichwasonceexclusivelyenjoyedbytheChief,andafterhimbytheLord,intheportionofthetribalterritorywhichformedhisowndomain。Ontheotherhand,severalsystemsofsuccessionafterdeath,andamongthemtheequaldivisionofthelandbetweenthechildren,havesprungoutoftribalownershipinvariousstagesofdecay;andithasleftanothersetoftracesnotquitesowidelyextended,inanumberofminutecustomaryruleswhichgoverntillageandoccasionallyregulatethedistributionoftheproduce。
ThefateofthisdoublesetofinstitutionsinEnglandandinFranceappearstomemostinstructive。IhavefrequentlydweltinthisplaceontheerroneousnessofthevulgaropinionwhichdatestheextremesubdivisionofthesoilofFrancefromthefirstFrenchRevolution,andfromthesaleoftheChurchlandsandoftheestatesoftheemigrantnobility。Awriter——IwasgoingtosayascommonlyreadasArthurYoung,butcertainlyasoftenmentionedasifhewerecommonlyread——noticesthismorcellement,ontheveryeveoftheFrenchRevolution,andimmediatelyafterit,asthegreatfeaturewhichdistinguishedFrancefromEngland。’FromwhatweseeinEngland,’hesays,’Travelsin1787,’88,and,’89’p。407’wecannotformanideaoftheabundanceinFranceofsmallproperties,thatis,littlefarmsbelongingtothosewhocultivatethem。’Heestimatesthatmorethanathirdofthekingdomwasoccupiedbythem——averylargeproportion,whentheextentofChurchlandinFranceistakenintoaccount;butrecentFrenchinvestigationshaveshownreasonsforthinkingthatthetrueproportionwasstilllarger,andthatitwasrathergrowingthandiminishing,throughthatextravaganceofthenobleswhichCourtlifefostered,andwhichcompelledthemtoselltheirdomainstopeasantsinsmallparcels。Youngclearlysawthatthissubdivisionofthesoilwastheresultofsomelegalrule;andstronglydissentingfromtheRevolutionaryleaderswhowishedtocarryitfarther,hedeclaredthat’alawoughttobepassedtorenderalldivisionbelowacertainnumberofarpentsillegal。’
ItseemstohaveverygenerallyescapednoticethatthelawofequalornearlyequaldivisionafterdeathwasthegenerallawofFrance。Theruleofprimogeniturewasofexceptionalapplication,andwasforthemostpartconfinedtolandsheldbyknightlytenure;indeed,intheSouthofFrance,wherethecustomofequaldivisionwasstrengthenedbytheidenticalruleoftheRomanjurisprudence,theprivilegesoftheeldestsonwereonlysecuredbycallingintheexceptionalrulesofwhichtheRomanLawgivesthebenefittomilitesorsoldiersonservicewhenmakingtheirwillsorregulatingtheirsuccessions,andbylayingdownthateverychevalier,andeverynobleofhigherdegree,wasamileswithinthemeaningoftheRomanjuridicalwriters。Thetwosystemsofsuccessionandthetwoformsofpropertylaysidebyside,andthereweremenalivequiterecentlywhocouldrememberthebitteranimositiescausedbytheirco-existenceandantagonism。Averygreatpartofthelandheldbylaymenbelongedtothepeasantry,anddescendedaccordingtotheruleofequaldivision,buteldestsonaftereldestsonsucceededtothesignory。Yetitwasnottheruleofprimogeniturefollowedinnobledescentswhichwasthetruegrievance;atmostitbecameagrievanceundertheinfluenceofthepeculiarveinofsentimentintroducedbyRousseau。Thelegacyfromtribalsovereigntytosignorialprivilege,whichwasreallyresented,wasthatwhichI
placedsecondinorder。Therighttoreceivefeudalduesandtoenforcepettymonopolies,nowalmostextinguishedinEnglandbythemeasurestowhichtheCopyholdCommissionhasgiveneffect,hadceasedlongbeforetheendofthelastcenturytobeofanyconsiderableimportancetotheclasswhichwasinvestedwithit;
butM。deTocquevillehasexplained,inhis’AncienR間ime’i。
......购买会员看全站小说,或者下载APP免费观看所有作品 点击立即下载,搜索"Lectures on the Early History of Institutions",免费读到尾