Democracy In America

第24章

试读中

第24章

Democracy In America Alexis de Toqueville

后面的故事,去 App 接着看,下载后搜索书名即可继续阅读。

Democracy In America
阅读主题
字体大小

  WhatIhavehithertosaidappliestoallnations,buttheremarkIamnowabouttomakeispeculiartotheAmericansandtodemocraticpeoples。Ihavealreadyobservedthatindemocraciesthemembersofthelegalprofessionandthemagistratesconstitutetheonlyaristocraticbodywhichcanchecktheirregularitiesofthepeople。Thisaristocracyisinvestedwithnophysicalpower,butitexercisesitsconservativeinfluenceuponthemindsofmen,andthemostabundantsourceofitsauthorityistheinstitutionoftheciviljury。Incriminalcauses,whensocietyisarmedagainstasingleindividual,thejuryisapttolookuponthejudgeasthepassiveinstrumentofsocialpower,andtomistrusthisadvice。Moreover,criminalcausesareentirelyfoundedupontheevidenceoffactswhichcommonsensecanreadilyappreciate;uponthisgroundthejudgeandthejuryareequal。Such,however,isnotthecaseincivilcauses;thenthejudgeappearsasadisinterestedarbiterbetweentheconflictingpassionsoftheparties。Thejurorslookuptohimwithconfidenceandlistentohimwithrespect,forinthisinstancetheirintelligenceiscompletelyunderthecontrolofhislearning。Itisthejudgewhosumsupthevariousargumentswithwhichtheirmemoryhasbeenweariedout,andwhoguidesthemthroughthedeviouscourseoftheproceedings;hepointstheirattentiontotheexactquestionoffactwhichtheyarecalledupontosolve,andheputstheanswertothequestionoflawintotheirmouths。Hisinfluenceupontheirverdictisalmostunlimited。

  IfIamcalledupontoexplainwhyIambutlittlemovedbytheargumentsderivedfromtheignoranceofjurorsincivilcauses,Ireply,thatintheseproceedings,wheneverthequestiontobesolvedisnotamerequestionoffact,thejuryhasonlythesemblanceofajudicialbody。Thejurysanctionsthedecisionofthejudge,theybytheauthorityofsocietywhichtheyrepresent,andhebythatofreasonandoflaw。*h[Footnoteh:SeeAppendix,R。]

  InEnglandandinAmericathejudgesexerciseaninfluenceuponcriminaltrialswhichtheFrenchjudgeshaveneverpossessed。Thereasonofthisdifferencemayeasilybediscovered;theEnglishandAmericanmagistratesestablishtheirauthorityincivilcauses,andonlytransferitafterwardstotribunalsofanotherkind,wherethatauthoritywasnotacquired。

  Insomecases(andtheyarefrequentlythemostimportantones)

  theAmericanjudgeshavetherightofdecidingcausesalone。*iUpontheseoccasionstheyareaccidentallyplacedinthepositionwhichtheFrenchjudgeshabituallyoccupy,buttheyareinvestedwithfarmorepowerthanthelatter;theyarestillsurroundedbythereminiscenceofthejury,andtheirjudgmenthasalmostasmuchauthorityasthevoiceofthecommunityatlarge,representedbythatinstitution。Theirinfluenceextendsbeyondthelimitsofthecourts;intherecreationsofprivatelifeaswellasintheturmoilofpublicbusiness,abroadandinthelegislativeassemblies,theAmericanjudgeisconstantlysurroundedbymenwhoareaccustomedtoregardhisintelligenceassuperiortotheirown,andafterhavingexercisedhispowerinthedecisionofcauses,hecontinuestoinfluencethehabitsofthoughtandthecharactersoftheindividualswhotookapartinhisjudgment。

后续内容在 App 继续看

精彩内容未完,打开 App 继续阅读

后面的故事已为你准备好,下载 App 后搜索“Democracy In America”即可继续阅读这一章。